Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Short-Term Beat-to-Beat QT Variability Appears Influenced More Strongly by Recording Quality Than by Beat-to-Beat RR Variability

O. Toman, K. Hnatkova, M. Šišáková, P. Smetana, KM. Huster, P. Barthel, T. Novotný, I. Andršová, G. Schmidt, M. Malik

. 2022 ; 13 (-) : 863873. [pub] 20220401

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Increases in beat-to-beat variability of electrocardiographic QT interval duration have repeatedly been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and complications. The measurements of QT variability are frequently normalized for the underlying RR interval variability. Such normalization supports the concept of the so-called immediate RR effect which relates each QT interval to the preceding RR interval. The validity of this concept was investigated in the present study together with the analysis of the influence of electrocardiographic morphological stability on QT variability measurements. The analyses involved QT and RR measurements in 6,114,562 individual beats of 642,708 separate 10-s ECG samples recorded in 523 healthy volunteers (259 females). Only beats with high morphology correlation (r > 0.99) with representative waveforms of the 10-s ECG samples were analyzed, assuring that only good quality recordings were included. In addition to these high correlations, SDs of the ECG signal difference between representative waveforms and individual beats expressed morphological instability and ECG noise. In the intra-subject analyses of both individual beats and of 10-s averages, QT interval variability was substantially more strongly related to the ECG noise than to the underlying RR variability. In approximately one-third of the analyzed ECG beats, the prolongation or shortening of the preceding RR interval was followed by the opposite change of the QT interval. In linear regression analyses, underlying RR variability within each 10-s ECG sample explained only 5.7 and 11.1% of QT interval variability in females and males, respectively. On the contrary, the underlying ECG noise contents of the 10-s samples explained 56.5 and 60.1% of the QT interval variability in females and males, respectively. The study concludes that the concept of stable and uniform immediate RR interval effect on the duration of subsequent QT interval duration is highly questionable. Even if only stable beat-to-beat measurements of QT interval are used, the QT interval variability is still substantially influenced by morphological variability and noise pollution of the source ECG recordings. Even when good quality recordings are used, noise contents of the electrocardiograms should be objectively examined in future studies of QT interval variability.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22017456
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220720100231.0
007      
ta
008      
220718s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fphys.2022.863873 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35431991
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Toman, Ondřej $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
245    10
$a Short-Term Beat-to-Beat QT Variability Appears Influenced More Strongly by Recording Quality Than by Beat-to-Beat RR Variability / $c O. Toman, K. Hnatkova, M. Šišáková, P. Smetana, KM. Huster, P. Barthel, T. Novotný, I. Andršová, G. Schmidt, M. Malik
520    9_
$a Increases in beat-to-beat variability of electrocardiographic QT interval duration have repeatedly been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and complications. The measurements of QT variability are frequently normalized for the underlying RR interval variability. Such normalization supports the concept of the so-called immediate RR effect which relates each QT interval to the preceding RR interval. The validity of this concept was investigated in the present study together with the analysis of the influence of electrocardiographic morphological stability on QT variability measurements. The analyses involved QT and RR measurements in 6,114,562 individual beats of 642,708 separate 10-s ECG samples recorded in 523 healthy volunteers (259 females). Only beats with high morphology correlation (r > 0.99) with representative waveforms of the 10-s ECG samples were analyzed, assuring that only good quality recordings were included. In addition to these high correlations, SDs of the ECG signal difference between representative waveforms and individual beats expressed morphological instability and ECG noise. In the intra-subject analyses of both individual beats and of 10-s averages, QT interval variability was substantially more strongly related to the ECG noise than to the underlying RR variability. In approximately one-third of the analyzed ECG beats, the prolongation or shortening of the preceding RR interval was followed by the opposite change of the QT interval. In linear regression analyses, underlying RR variability within each 10-s ECG sample explained only 5.7 and 11.1% of QT interval variability in females and males, respectively. On the contrary, the underlying ECG noise contents of the 10-s samples explained 56.5 and 60.1% of the QT interval variability in females and males, respectively. The study concludes that the concept of stable and uniform immediate RR interval effect on the duration of subsequent QT interval duration is highly questionable. Even if only stable beat-to-beat measurements of QT interval are used, the QT interval variability is still substantially influenced by morphological variability and noise pollution of the source ECG recordings. Even when good quality recordings are used, noise contents of the electrocardiograms should be objectively examined in future studies of QT interval variability.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hnatkova, Katerina $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Šišáková, Martina $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Smetana, Peter $u Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Huster, Katharina M $u Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Barthel, Petra $u Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Novotný, Tomáš $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Andršová, Irena $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
700    1_
$a Schmidt, Georg $u Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Malik, Marek $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
773    0_
$w MED00174601 $t Frontiers in physiology $x 1664-042X $g Roč. 13, č. - (2022), s. 863873
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35431991 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220720100227 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1816595 $s 1168698
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 13 $c - $d 863873 $e 20220401 $i 1664-042X $m Frontiers in physiology $n Front. physiol. $x MED00174601
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220718

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...