Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children

S. Šikolová, M. Urík, D. Hošnová, V. Kruntorád, M. Bartoš, O. Motyka, P. Jabandžiev

. 2022 ; 279 (7) : 3387-3398. [pub] 20210908

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22017879

Grantová podpora
MUNI/A/1118/2020 Masarykova Univerzita
FNBr Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
65269705 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000753 Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate audiological benefits, quality of hearing and safety of two Bonebridge generation: BCI601 and BCI602 (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in children. METHODS: Twelve children were implanted: five BCI601 and seven BCI602 comprising of ten conductive hearing loss, and two single sided deaf SSD subjects. Audiological outcomes tested were sound field audiometry, functional gain, speech recognition threshold (SRT50), speech recognition in noise (SPRINT) and localisation abilities. Subjective measures were Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12). RESULTS: The mean FG with the BCI601 was 25.0 dB and with the BCI602 28.0 dB. The benefit in SRT50 was 23.2 dB and 33.8 dB, respectively. The mean benefit in SPRINT was 15% and 6.7% and the localisation ability improved from 33.3° to 16° and from 26.2° to 17.6°, respectively. The two SSD subjects reported a FG of 17 dB, a benefit in SRT50 of 22.5 and a benefit in SPRINT of 20%. Subjective outcomes improved significantly and even exceeded the values of their age-and sex matched normal hearing peers. One revision was reported: a retroauricular emphysema above the implant occurred 12 months post-OP, it was resolved operatively with the implant still being functional. CONCLUSION: The pediatric cohort reports significant audiological benefit, even exceeding that of the age- and sex matched control. The combination of the high safety and audiological benefit makes the Bonebridge a comfortable and effective option in hearing rehabilitation in children.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22017879
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134434.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34495351
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Šikolová, Soňa $u Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children / $c S. Šikolová, M. Urík, D. Hošnová, V. Kruntorád, M. Bartoš, O. Motyka, P. Jabandžiev
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate audiological benefits, quality of hearing and safety of two Bonebridge generation: BCI601 and BCI602 (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in children. METHODS: Twelve children were implanted: five BCI601 and seven BCI602 comprising of ten conductive hearing loss, and two single sided deaf SSD subjects. Audiological outcomes tested were sound field audiometry, functional gain, speech recognition threshold (SRT50), speech recognition in noise (SPRINT) and localisation abilities. Subjective measures were Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12). RESULTS: The mean FG with the BCI601 was 25.0 dB and with the BCI602 28.0 dB. The benefit in SRT50 was 23.2 dB and 33.8 dB, respectively. The mean benefit in SPRINT was 15% and 6.7% and the localisation ability improved from 33.3° to 16° and from 26.2° to 17.6°, respectively. The two SSD subjects reported a FG of 17 dB, a benefit in SRT50 of 22.5 and a benefit in SPRINT of 20%. Subjective outcomes improved significantly and even exceeded the values of their age-and sex matched normal hearing peers. One revision was reported: a retroauricular emphysema above the implant occurred 12 months post-OP, it was resolved operatively with the implant still being functional. CONCLUSION: The pediatric cohort reports significant audiological benefit, even exceeding that of the age- and sex matched control. The combination of the high safety and audiological benefit makes the Bonebridge a comfortable and effective option in hearing rehabilitation in children.
650    _2
$a kostní vedení zvuku $7 D001844
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a sluch $7 D006309
650    12
$a sluchové pomůcky $7 D006310
650    _2
$a převodní nedoslýchavost $x chirurgie $7 D006314
650    _2
$a sluchové testy $7 D006320
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a percepce řeči $7 D013067
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Urík, Milan $u Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic. urik.milan@fnbrno.cz $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic. urik.milan@fnbrno.cz $1 https://orcid.org/000000022872185X
700    1_
$a Hošnová, Dagmar $u Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kruntorád, Vít $u Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bartoš, Michal $u Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Brno, Černopolní 9, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Motyka, Oldřich $u Nanotechnology Centre, CEET, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic $u Centre ENET, CEET, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jabandžiev, Petr $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Kamenice 5, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Brno, 61300, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00009617 $t European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery $x 1434-4726 $g Roč. 279, č. 7 (2022), s. 3387-3398
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34495351 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134428 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1821800 $s 1169122
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 279 $c 7 $d 3387-3398 $e 20210908 $i 1434-4726 $m European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology $n Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol $x MED00009617
GRA    __
$a MUNI/A/1118/2020 $p Masarykova Univerzita
GRA    __
$a FNBr $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
GRA    __
$a 65269705 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000753 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace