• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Evaluation of the short-term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation

CM. Diedrich, Z. Guler, L. Hympanova, E. Vodegel, M. Zündel, E. Mazza, J. Deprest, JP. Roovers

. 2022 ; 129 (7) : 1039-1049. [pub] 20211229

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22018106

Grantová podpora
Tepha, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the host- and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh. DESIGN: In vivo animal experiment. SETTING: KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies. POPULATION: Fourteen parous female Mule sheep. METHODS: P4HB scaffolds were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of sheep. The comparative PP mesh data were obtained from an identical study protocol performed previously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gross necropsy, host response and biomechanical evaluation of explants, and the in vivo P4HB scaffold degradation were evaluated at 60- and 180-days post-implantation. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM). RESULTS: Gross necropsy revealed no implant-related adverse events using P4HB scaffolds. The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants increased at 180-days (12.498 ± 2.66 N/mm SEM [p =0.019]) as compared to 60-days (4.585 ± 1.57 N/mm) post-implantation, while P4HB degraded gradually. P4HB scaffolds exhibited excellent tissue integration with dense connective tissue and a moderate initial host response. P4HB scaffolds induced a significantly higher M2/M1 ratio (1.70 ± 0.67 SD, score 0-4), as compared to PP mesh(0.99 ± 0.78 SD, score 0-4) at 180-days. CONCLUSIONS: P4HB scaffold facilitated a gradual load transfer to vaginal tissue over time. The fully absorbable P4HB scaffold, in comparison to PP mesh, has a favorable host response with comparable load-bearing capacity. If these results are also observed at longer follow-up in-vivo, a clinical study using P4HB for vaginal POP surgery may be warranted to demonstrate efficacy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22018106
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134547.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/1471-0528.17040 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34865300
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Diedrich, Chantal M $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine (AMC), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000205793535
245    10
$a Evaluation of the short-term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation / $c CM. Diedrich, Z. Guler, L. Hympanova, E. Vodegel, M. Zündel, E. Mazza, J. Deprest, JP. Roovers
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the host- and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh. DESIGN: In vivo animal experiment. SETTING: KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies. POPULATION: Fourteen parous female Mule sheep. METHODS: P4HB scaffolds were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of sheep. The comparative PP mesh data were obtained from an identical study protocol performed previously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gross necropsy, host response and biomechanical evaluation of explants, and the in vivo P4HB scaffold degradation were evaluated at 60- and 180-days post-implantation. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM). RESULTS: Gross necropsy revealed no implant-related adverse events using P4HB scaffolds. The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants increased at 180-days (12.498 ± 2.66 N/mm SEM [p =0.019]) as compared to 60-days (4.585 ± 1.57 N/mm) post-implantation, while P4HB degraded gradually. P4HB scaffolds exhibited excellent tissue integration with dense connective tissue and a moderate initial host response. P4HB scaffolds induced a significantly higher M2/M1 ratio (1.70 ± 0.67 SD, score 0-4), as compared to PP mesh(0.99 ± 0.78 SD, score 0-4) at 180-days. CONCLUSIONS: P4HB scaffold facilitated a gradual load transfer to vaginal tissue over time. The fully absorbable P4HB scaffold, in comparison to PP mesh, has a favorable host response with comparable load-bearing capacity. If these results are also observed at longer follow-up in-vivo, a clinical study using P4HB for vaginal POP surgery may be warranted to demonstrate efficacy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hydroxybutyráty $7 D006885
650    12
$a polypropyleny $7 D011126
650    _2
$a ovce $7 D012756
650    12
$a chirurgické síťky $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013526
650    _2
$a vagina $x chirurgie $7 D014621
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Guler, Zeliha $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine (AMC), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000172938151
700    1_
$a Hympanova, Lucie $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vodegel, Eva $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine (AMC), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000168979495
700    1_
$a Zündel, Manuel $u Institute of Mechanical Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland $u Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Mazza, Edoardo $u Institute of Mechanical Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland $u Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Deprest, Jan $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/000000024920945X
700    1_
$a Roovers, Jan Paul $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine (AMC), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
773    0_
$w MED00005444 $t BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology $x 1471-0528 $g Roč. 129, č. 7 (2022), s. 1039-1049
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34865300 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134541 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1821936 $s 1169349
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 129 $c 7 $d 1039-1049 $e 20211229 $i 1471-0528 $m BJOG $n BJOG $x MED00005444
GRA    __
$p Tepha, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace