-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparative assessment of immunochromatography and ELISA diagnostic tests for HBsAg detection in PCR-confirmed HBV infection
N. Navvabi, MH. Khadem Ansari, A. Navvabi, HR. Chalipa, F. Zitricky
Language English Country Mexico
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2013
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-10-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
- MeSH
- Chromatography, Affinity MeSH
- Diagnostic Tests, Routine MeSH
- Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay MeSH
- Hepatitis B Surface Antigens * MeSH
- Hepatitis B * diagnosis MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Polymerase Chain Reaction MeSH
- Hepatitis B virus genetics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Iran MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Viral hepatitis, which appears most frequently at birth or during childhood, is a disease whose transmission routes include tears, bile, sexual fluids, sweat, milk, urine, feces, and saliva. The aim of the present study was to analyze the specificity of the immunochromatographic and ELISA diagnostic tests for hepatitis B surface antigen and compare them with PCR testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample was made up of 140 men and 60 women referred to the Urmia Medical University hospital to undergo PCR testing for HBV diagnosis. The ELISA test was performed using the Pioneer Medicine Company kit (Tehran, Iran). RESULTS: The results of the HBs-Ag rapid test and the ELISA test were compared with the PCR test. The HBs-Ag rapid test had 97% sensitivity and 91% specificity, whereas the ELISA test had 78% sensitivity and 76% specificity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: According to our results, the immunochromatographic test was accurate for diagnosing HBs-Ag in blood and the ELISA test had acceptable sensitivity and specificity, compared with PCR testing.
Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica Escuela de Medicina de Urmia Urmia Iran
Departamento de Biotecnología Microbiana Universidad Islámica Azad Urmia Iran
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22019064
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220804135326.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220720s2022 mx f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2021.11.007 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34776394
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a mx
- 100 1_
- $a Navvabi, N $u Departamento de Biología de Tumor e Inmunoterapia, Facultad de Medicina de Pilsen, Universidad Charles, Praga, Czech Republic. Electronic address: navvabi.nn@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a Comparative assessment of immunochromatography and ELISA diagnostic tests for HBsAg detection in PCR-confirmed HBV infection / $c N. Navvabi, MH. Khadem Ansari, A. Navvabi, HR. Chalipa, F. Zitricky
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Viral hepatitis, which appears most frequently at birth or during childhood, is a disease whose transmission routes include tears, bile, sexual fluids, sweat, milk, urine, feces, and saliva. The aim of the present study was to analyze the specificity of the immunochromatographic and ELISA diagnostic tests for hepatitis B surface antigen and compare them with PCR testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample was made up of 140 men and 60 women referred to the Urmia Medical University hospital to undergo PCR testing for HBV diagnosis. The ELISA test was performed using the Pioneer Medicine Company kit (Tehran, Iran). RESULTS: The results of the HBs-Ag rapid test and the ELISA test were compared with the PCR test. The HBs-Ag rapid test had 97% sensitivity and 91% specificity, whereas the ELISA test had 78% sensitivity and 76% specificity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: According to our results, the immunochromatographic test was accurate for diagnosing HBs-Ag in blood and the ELISA test had acceptable sensitivity and specificity, compared with PCR testing.
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie afinitní $7 D002846
- 650 _2
- $a diagnostické testy rutinní $7 D003955
- 650 _2
- $a ELISA $7 D004797
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a hepatitida B $x diagnóza $7 D006509
- 650 12
- $a hepatitida B - antigeny povrchové $7 D006514
- 650 _2
- $a virus hepatitidy B $x genetika $7 D006515
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a novorozenec $7 D007231
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D016133
- 651 _2
- $a Írán $7 D007492
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Khadem Ansari, M H $u Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Escuela de Medicina de Urmia, Urmia, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a Navvabi, A $u Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Marinas y Tecnología, Universidad de Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a Chalipa, H R $u Departamento de Biotecnología Microbiana, Universidad Islámica Azad, Urmia, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a Zitricky, F $u Laboratorio de Neurofisiología Experimental, Centro Biomédico, Facultad de Medicina de Pilsen, Universidad Charles, Praga, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00209451 $t Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English) $x 2255-534X $g Roč. 87, č. 2 (2022), s. 176-180
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34776394 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220804135320 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1822602 $s 1170307
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 87 $c 2 $d 176-180 $e 20211111 $i 2255-534X $m Revista de Gastroenterología de México $n Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) $x MED00209451
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220720