Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of short-term and long-term neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S. Katayama, K. Mori, B. Pradere, H. Mostafaei, VM. Schuettfort, F. Quhal, RS. Motlagh, E. Laukhtina, NC. Grossmann, P. Rajwa, A. Aydh, F. König, R. Mathieu, P. Nyirady, PI. Karakiewicz, Y. Nasu, SF. Shariat

. 2022 ; 56 (2) : 85-93. [pub] 20220210

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of long-term neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) before radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We conducted meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, which included randomized controlled trials that assessed patients with prostate cancer (PC) who received either short-term (<6 months) or long-term (≥6 months) neoadjuvant ADT before RP. RESULTS: Thirteen articles with 2778 patients were eligible for analysis. Short-term neoadjuvant ADT was neither associated with biochemical recurrence (OR 1.19, 95% CI, 0.93-1.51, p = 0.17), metastasis (OR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.45-1.19, p = 0.21), nor overall mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.21, p = 0.22); no study investigated survival outcomes in patients on long-term neoadjuvant ADT. In terms of pathologic outcomes, long-term neoadjuvant ADT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of positive surgical margin (SM) and an increased rate of organ-confined disease (OCD) compared to short-term neoadjuvant ADT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80, p = 0.001, and OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-1.99, p = 0.009, respectively). These findings were confirmed in the network meta-analyses. Meanwhile, only a non-significant trend favoring long-term neoadjuvant ADT was observed for pathologic complete response (OR 1.98, 95% Crl 1.00-3.93). CONCLUSION: Long-term neoadjuvant ADT was associated with more favorable pathologic outcomes, but whether these findings translate into favorable survival outcomes still remains unproven due to very limited evidence. Since there are no reliable survival data, long-term neoadjuvant ADT before RP should not be used in clinical practice until more robust evidence arises from ongoing trials.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Canada

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia

Department of Urology King Faisal Medical City Abha Saudi Arabia

Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

Department of Urology Rennes University Hospital Rennes France

Department of Urology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery Jordan University Hospital Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22019066
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135327.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/21681805.2022.2034941 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35142251
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Katayama, Satoshi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000283772457
245    10
$a Comparison of short-term and long-term neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis / $c S. Katayama, K. Mori, B. Pradere, H. Mostafaei, VM. Schuettfort, F. Quhal, RS. Motlagh, E. Laukhtina, NC. Grossmann, P. Rajwa, A. Aydh, F. König, R. Mathieu, P. Nyirady, PI. Karakiewicz, Y. Nasu, SF. Shariat
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of long-term neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) before radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We conducted meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, which included randomized controlled trials that assessed patients with prostate cancer (PC) who received either short-term (<6 months) or long-term (≥6 months) neoadjuvant ADT before RP. RESULTS: Thirteen articles with 2778 patients were eligible for analysis. Short-term neoadjuvant ADT was neither associated with biochemical recurrence (OR 1.19, 95% CI, 0.93-1.51, p = 0.17), metastasis (OR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.45-1.19, p = 0.21), nor overall mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.21, p = 0.22); no study investigated survival outcomes in patients on long-term neoadjuvant ADT. In terms of pathologic outcomes, long-term neoadjuvant ADT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of positive surgical margin (SM) and an increased rate of organ-confined disease (OCD) compared to short-term neoadjuvant ADT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80, p = 0.001, and OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-1.99, p = 0.009, respectively). These findings were confirmed in the network meta-analyses. Meanwhile, only a non-significant trend favoring long-term neoadjuvant ADT was observed for pathologic complete response (OR 1.98, 95% Crl 1.00-3.93). CONCLUSION: Long-term neoadjuvant ADT was associated with more favorable pathologic outcomes, but whether these findings translate into favorable survival outcomes still remains unproven due to very limited evidence. Since there are no reliable survival data, long-term neoadjuvant ADT before RP should not be used in clinical practice until more robust evidence arises from ongoing trials.
650    12
$a antagonisté androgenů $x terapeutické užití $7 D000726
650    _2
$a hormony $x terapeutické užití $7 D006728
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a neoadjuvantní terapie $7 D020360
650    _2
$a prostatektomie $7 D011468
650    12
$a nádory prostaty $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D011471
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Mori, Keiichiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
700    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277688558
700    1_
$a Mostafaei, Hadi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
700    1_
$a Schuettfort, Victor M $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Quhal, Fahad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000281636953
700    1_
$a Motlagh, Reza Sari $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
700    1_
$a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000289530272
700    1_
$a Grossmann, Nico C $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Rajwa, Pawel $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
700    1_
$a Aydh, Abdulmajeed $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
700    1_
$a König, Frederik $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Mathieu, Romain $u Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France $1 https://orcid.org/0000000268667827
700    1_
$a Nyirady, Peter $u Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
700    1_
$a Karakiewicz, Pierre I $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
700    1_
$a Nasu, Yasutomo $u Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria $u Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000266276179
773    0_
$w MED00193240 $t Scandinavian journal of urology $x 2168-1813 $g Roč. 56, č. 2 (2022), s. 85-93
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35142251 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135321 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822604 $s 1170309
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 56 $c 2 $d 85-93 $e 20220210 $i 2168-1813 $m Scandinavian journal of urology $n Scand J Urol $x MED00193240
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...