To identify risk factors for upper urinary tract recurrence (UUTR) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC). The PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched on March 2022 to identify relevant studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that provided multivariate logistic regression analyses. The pooled UUTR rate was calculated using a fixed effect model. We identified 235 papers, of which seven and 6 articles, comprising a total of 8981 and 8404 UBC patients, were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. Overall, 418 (4.65%) patients were diagnosed with UUTR within a median time of 1.4 to 3.1 years after RC. Risk factors for UUTR were surgical margin (hazard ratio [HR] 3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-4.49, P < .00001), preoperative hydronephrosis (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.25-2.43, P = .001), ureteral margin (HR: 4.34, 95% CI: 2.75-6.85, P < .00001), and pT stage (HR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.37-5.27, P < .004). Incorporation of established risk factors into a clinical prediction model might aid in the decision-making process regarding the intensity and type of surveillance protocols after RC as well as help determine the pretest probability of UUTR.
- MeSH
- cystektomie metody MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * chirurgie patologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru epidemiologie chirurgie MeSH
- močové ústrojí * patologie MeSH
- močový měchýř patologie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * chirurgie patologie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- statistické modely MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of ureteric injuries, clinical value of prophylactic ureteric stenting and impact of intra- or postoperative detection of ureteric injuries in patients treated with gynaecological or colorectal surgery. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before September 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated the differences in the rate of ureteric injuries between laparoscopic and open surgery, prophylactic ureteric stenting or not, and those of final treatment success between intra- and postoperative detection in patients who underwent gynaecological or colorectal surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 46 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher incidence of ureteric injuries (pooled odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-2.62), but there was no statistically significant difference in colectomy (pooled OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03). Prophylactic ureteric stenting was associated with a lower incidence of ureteric injuries during gynaecological surgery (pooled OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). The number needed to perform ureteric stenting to prevent one ureteric injury was 224 in gynaecological surgery. On the other hand, prophylactic ureteric stenting did not reduce the risk of ureteric injuries during colorectal surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury was associated with a lower rate of complication management failure compared to postoperative detection (pooled OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy seems to be associated with a higher rate of ureteric injuries compared to an open approach. Prophylactic ureteric stenting seems to reduce this risk during gynaecological surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury during abdominal/pelvic surgery improves outcomes, suggesting the need for awareness and proactive problem identification. Further well-designed studies assessing the candidates who are more likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteric stenting including cost analysis are needed.
- MeSH
- gynekologické chirurgické výkony MeSH
- iatrogenní nemoci epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- laparoskopie * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ureter * chirurgie zranění MeSH
- urologické nemoci * chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
PURPOSE: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the current different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimes for bladder cancer patients to rank them. METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in NMA of six different therapy regimens cisplatin, cisplatin/doxorubicin, (gemcitabine/cisplatin) GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine (MCV) and (MVAC) compared to locoregional treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprised 4276 patients who met the eligibility criteria. Six different regimes were not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of overall mortality rate compared to local treatment alone. In progression-free survival (PFS) rates, cisplatin, GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, MCV and MVAC were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of PFS rate compared to locoregional treatment alone. In local control outcome, MCV, MVAC, GC and cisplatin/methotrexate were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of local control rate versus locoregional treatment alone. Nevertheless, based on the analyses of the treatment ranking according to SUCRA, it was highly likely that MVAC with high certainty of results appeared as the most effective approach in terms of mortality, PFS and local control rates. GC and cisplatin/doxorubicin with low certainty of results was found to be the best second options. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in mortality, progression-free survival and local control rates before and after adjusting the type of definitive treatment in any of the six study arms. However, MVAC was found to be the most effective regimen with high certainty, while cisplatin alone and cisplatin/methotrexate should not be recommended as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regime.
- MeSH
- Bayesova věta MeSH
- cisplatina * terapeutické užití MeSH
- cystektomie MeSH
- doxorubicin terapeutické užití MeSH
- gemcitabin MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- methotrexát terapeutické užití MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie MeSH
- neoadjuvantní terapie metody MeSH
- protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie MeSH
- síťová metaanalýza MeSH
- vinblastin terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: While family history (FHx) of prostate cancer (PCa) increases the risk of PCa, comparably less is known regarding the impact of FHx on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our multicenter database comprising 6,041 nonmetastatic PCa patients treated with RP. Patients with a FHx of PCa in one or more first-degree relatives were considered as FHx positive. We examined the association of FHx with pathologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) using logistic and Cox regression models, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 1,677 (28%) patients reported a FHx of PCa. Compared to patients without FHx, those with, were younger at RP (median age of 59 vs. 62 years, p < 0.01), and had significantlymore favorable biopsy and RP histopathologic findings. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, positive FHx was associated with extracapsular extension (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.90, p < 0.01; model AUC 0.73) and upgrading (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.80, p < 0.01; model AUC 0.68). Incorporating FHx significantly improved the AUC of the base model for upgrading (p < 0.01). Positive FHx was not associated with BCR in pre- and postoperative multivariable models (p = 0.1 and p = 0.7); c-indexes of Cox multivariable models were: 0.73 and 0.82, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with clinically nonmetastatic PCa who have positive FHx of PCa undergo RP at a younger age and have more favorable pathologic outcomes. Nevertheless, FHx of PCa did not confer better BCR rates, suggesting that FHx leads to potentially early detection and treatment without impact on BCR.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Intraoperative physiologic changes related to the steep Trendelenburg position have been investigated with the widespread adoption of robot-assisted pelvic surgery (RAPS). However, the impact of the steep Trendelenburg position on postoperative complications remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare RAPS to laparoscopic/open pelvic surgery with regards to the rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE), cardiac, and cerebrovascular complications. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the influence of confounding risk factors. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 47 non-randomized controlled studies (NRSs), with a total of 380,125 patients, were included. Although RAPS was associated with a decreased risk of VTE and cardiac complications compared to laparoscopic/open pelvic surgery in NRSs [risk ratio (RR), 0.59; 95% CI 0.51-0.72, p < 0.001 and RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.58-1.50, p = 0.78, respectively], these differences were not confirmed in RCTs (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.52-1.62, p = 0.77 and RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.58-1.50, p = 0.78, respectively). In subgroup analyses of laparoscopic surgery, there was no significant difference in the risk of VTE and cardiac complications in both RCTs and NRSs. In the meta-regression, none of the risk factors were found to be associated with heterogeneity. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in cerebrovascular complications between RAPS and laparoscopic/open pelvic surgery. Our meta-analysis suggests that the steep Trendelenburg position does not seem to affect postoperative complications and, therefore, can be considered safe with regard to the risk of VTE, cardiac, and cerebrovascular complications. However, proper individualized preventive measures should still be implemented during all surgeries including RAPS to warrant patient safety.
- MeSH
- antikoagulancia MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační komplikace epidemiologie etiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- roboticky asistované výkony * metody MeSH
- Trendelenburgova poloha škodlivé účinky MeSH
- žilní tromboembolie * epidemiologie etiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To determine the oncologic and toxicity outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients treated with radical surgery for urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in the network meta-analysis of different therapy regimens compared to observation or placebo. RESULTS: Nine studies comprised of 2,444 patients met the eligibility criteria. In bladder UC, chemotherapy, atezolizumab, and nivolumab did not improve disease progression compared to observation/placebo. In upper tract UC (UTUC), chemotherapy was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of disease progression compared to observation/placebo, while atezolizumab and nivolumab were not. Based on the analysis of the treatment ranking, adjuvant chemotherapy appeared as the best treatment approach in both bladder UC and UTUC. The risk of adverse events with ICIs was comparable to that of observation/placebo. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests a superior oncologic benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy over ICIs in patients treated with radical surgery for both bladder UC and UTUC.
- MeSH
- Bayesova věta MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * farmakoterapie chirurgie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie chirurgie MeSH
- protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- síťová metaanalýza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
Introduction: It has been hypothesized that transurethral en bloc (TUEB) of bladder tumor offers benefits over conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT). This study aimed to compare disease outcomes of TUEB and cTURBT with focus on the different energy sources. Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases in June 2021. Studies that compared the pathological (detrusor muscle presence), oncological (recurrence rates) efficacy, and safety (serious adverse events [SAEs]) of TUEB and cTURBT were included. Random- and fixed-effects meta-analytic models and Bayesian approach in the network meta-analysis was used. Results: Seven randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and seven non-RCTs (NRCT), with a total of 2092 patients. The pooled 3- and 12-month recurrence risk ratios (RR) of five and four NRCTs were 0.46 (95% CI 0.29-0.73) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.33-0.96), respectively. The pooled 3- and 12-month recurrence RRs of four and seven RCTs were 0.57 (95% CI 0.25-1.27) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.69-1.15), respectively. The pooled RR for SAEs such as prolonged hematuria and bladder perforation of seven RCTs was 0.16 (95% CI 0.06-0.41) in benefit of TUEB. Seven RCTs (n = 1077) met our eligibility criteria for network meta-analysis. There was no difference in 12-month recurrence rates between hybridknife, laser, and bipolar TUEB compared with cTURBT. Contrary, laser TUEB was significantly associated with lower SAEs compared with cTURBT. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranking analyses showed with high certainty that laser TUEB was the best treatment option to access all endpoints. Conclusion: While NRCTs suggested a recurrence-free benefit to TUEB compared with cTURBT, RCTs failed to confirm this. Conversely, SAEs were consistently and clinically significantly better for TUEB. Network meta-analyses suggested laser TUEB has the best performance compared with other energy sources. These early findings need to be confirmed and expanded upon.
Pembrolizumab is the standard for the first and second lines in treating metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the value of pretreatment clinical characteristics and hematologic biomarkers for prognosticating response to pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic UC. PUBMED®, Web of ScienceTM, and Scopus® databases were searched for articles published before May 2021 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab and pretreatment clinical characteristics or laboratory examination. Overall, 13 studies comprising 1311 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Several pretreatment patients' demographics and hematologic biomarkers were significantly associated with worse OS as follows: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) ≥ 2 (Pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 3.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.57-4.09), presence of visceral metastasis (Pooled HR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.42-2.38), presence of liver metastasis (Pooled HR: 4.23, 95% CI 2.18-8.20), higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (Pooled HR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.07-1.55) and, higher c-reactive protein (CRP) (Pooled HR: 2.49, 95% CI 1.52-4.07). Metastatic UC patients with poor PS, liver metastasis, higher pretreatment NLR and/or CRP have a worse survival despite pembrolizumab treatment. These findings might help to guide the prognostic tools for clinical decision-making; however, they should be interpreted carefully, owing to limitations regarding the retrospective nature of primary data.
- MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
PURPOSE: To test discontinuation rates during Active Surveillance (AS) in patients diagnosed with incidental prostate cancers (IPCa) vs. tumors diagnosed at prostate biopsies (BxPCa). METHODS: Retrospective single center analysis of 961 vs. 121 BxPCa vs. IPCa patients (2008-2020). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested four different outcomes: (1) any-cause discontinuation; (2) discontinuation due to ISUP GG upgrading; (3) biopsy discontinuation due to ISUP GG upgrading or > 3 positive cores; (4) biopsy discontinuation or suspicious extraprostatic extension at surveillance mpMRI. Then, multivariable logistic regression models tested rates of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (ISUP GG ≥ 3 or pT ≥ 3a or pN1) after radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: Median time follow-up was 35 (19-64) months. IPCa patients were at lower risk of any-cause (3-year survival: 79.3 vs. 66%; HR: 0.5, p = 0.001) and biopsy/MRI AS discontinuation (3-year survival: 82.3 vs. 72.7%; HR: 0.5, p = 0.001), compared to BxPCa patients. Conversely, IPCa patients exhibited same rates of biopsy discontinuation and ISUP GG upgrading over time, relative to BxPCa. In multivariable logistic regression models, IPCa patients were associated with higher rates of csPCa at RP (OR: 1.4, p = 0.03), relative to their BxPCa counterparts. CONCLUSION: AS represents a safe management strategy for IPCa. Compared to BxPCa, IPCa patients are less prone to experience any-cause and biopsy/MRI AS discontinuation. However, the two mentioned groups present similar rates of biopsy discontinuation and ISUP GG upgrading over time. In consequence, tailored AS protocols with scheduled repeated surveillance biopsies should be offered to all newly diagnosed IPCa patients.
- MeSH
- biopsie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prostaty * patologie MeSH
- pozorné vyčkávání MeSH
- prostata * diagnostické zobrazování patologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Elevated preoperative plasma levels of the angiogenesis-related marker VEGF have been associated with worse oncological outcomes in various malignancies. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive/prognostic role of VEGF in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) treated with radical cystectomy (RC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: VEGF plasma levels were measured preoperatively in 1036 patients with UCB who underwent RC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The correlation between plasma VEGF levels and pathological and survival outcomes was assessed using logistic regression and Cox regression analyses. Discrimination was assessed using the concordance index (C index). The clinical net benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients with higher pretreatment plasma VEGF levels had poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) according to log-rank tests (all p < 0.001). Higher VEGF levels were not independently associated with higher risk of lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease, or non-organ-confined disease (all p > 0.05). Preoperative plasma VEGF levels were independently associated with RFS, CSS, and OS in preoperative and postoperative multivariable models. However, in all cases the C index increased by <0.02 and there was no improvement in net benefit on DCA. A limitation is that none of the patients received current elements of standard of care such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma VEGF levels were associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive disease such as worse survival outcomes among patients with UCB treated with RC. However, VEGF appears to have relatively limited incremental additive value in clinical use. Further study of VEGF for UCB prognostication is warranted before routine use in clinical algorithms. PATIENT SUMMARY: Currently available models for predicting outcomes in bladder cancer are less than optimal. A protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is a marker of the formation of blood vessels (angiogenesis), may have a role in predicting survival outcomes in bladder cancer.
