Diabetic foot (DF) can develop in diabetic patients after organ transplantation (Tx) due to several factors including peripheral arterial disease (PAD), diabetic neuropathy and inappropriate DF prevention. Aim: To assess the occurrence of DF and associated risk factors in transplant patients. Methods: Fifty-seven diabetic patients were enrolled as part of this prospective study. All patients underwent organ Tx (01/2013-12/2015) and were followed up for minimum of 12 months up to a maximum of 50 months. Over the study period we evaluated DF incidence and identified a number of factors likely to influence DF development, including organ function, presence of late complications, PAD, history of DF, levels of physical activity before and after Tx, patient education and standards of DF prevention. Results: Active DF developed in 31.6% (18/57) of patients after organ Tx within 11 months on average (10.7 ± 8 months). The following factors significantly correlated with DF development: diabetes control (p = .0065), PAD (p<0.0001), transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2;p = .01), history of DF (p = .0031), deformities (p = .0021) and increased leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) before Tx (p = .037). However, based on logistic stepwise regression analysis, the only factors significantly associated with DF during the post-transplant period were: PAD, deformities and increased LTPA. Education was provided to patients periodically (2.6 ± 2.5 times) during the observation period. Although 94.7% of patients regularly inspected their feet (4.5 ± 2.9 times/week), only 26.3% of transplant patients used appropriate footwear. Conclusions: Incidence of DF was relatively high, affecting almost 1/3 of pancreas and kidney/pancreas recipients. The predominant risk factors were: presence of PAD, foot deformities and higher LTPA before Tx. Therefore, we recommend a programme involving more detailed vascular and physical examinations and more intensive education focusing on physical activity and DF prevention in at-risk patients before transplantation.
- MeSH
- cvičení fyziologie MeSH
- diabetická noha * epidemiologie prevence a kontrola etiologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hodnocení rizik metody MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační komplikace epidemiologie prevence a kontrola etiologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- transplantace ledvin * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- transplantace slinivky břišní * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Cíl: Cílem práce bylo zhodnotit výskyt stresové inkontinence moči po operaci prolapsu pánevního dna metodou laparoskopické sakrokolpopexe. Jedná se o retrospektivní multicentrickou studii. Metodika: Do studie bylo zařazeno 131 pacientek, které podstoupily laparoskopickou sakrokolpopexi a následně minimálně jednoletý follow-up v podobě klinického vyšetření. Výsledky: Soubor zahrnoval pacientky s průměrným věkem 63,4 let (38–80 let), BMI 26,6 kg/m2 (19,4–36 kg/m2) a paritou 2 (0–4). Před operací vykazovalo stresovou inkontinenci 30 (22,9 %) pacientek, pooperačně 50 (38,2 %), rozdíl byl statisticky signifikantní (p = 0,0007). Následnou antiinkontinenční operaci podstoupilo 30 (22,9 %) pacientek, u 10 (7,6 %) pacientek došlo k významnému zlepšení stresové inkontinence. Závěr: Rekonstrukce prolapsu orgánů pánevního dna laparoskopickou sakrokolpopexí je spojena s rizikem pooperační stresové inkontinence ve 38,2 %, z toho de novo ve 22,9 % případů.
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy method. This is a retrospective multicenter study. Methods: The study included 131 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and underwent at least a one-year follow-up in the form of a clinical examination. Results: The group included patients with an average age of 63.4 years (38–80 years), BMI 26.6 kg/m2 (19.4–36 kg/m2), and parity 2 (0–4). Before surgery, 30 (22.9%) patients showed stress incontinence, and after surgery there were 50 (38.2%); the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0007). Thirty (22.9%) patients underwent subsequent anti-incontinence surgery, while 10 (7.6%) patients experienced significant improvement of stress incontinence. Conclusion: Pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction surgery by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is associated with the risk of postoperative stress incontinence in 38.2%, of which de novo in 22.9% of cases.
- MeSH
- gynekologické chirurgické výkony metody škodlivé účinky MeSH
- laparoskopie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační komplikace etiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- prolaps pánevních orgánů chirurgie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- stresová inkontinence moči * chirurgie etiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ileocaecal resection (ICR) is frequent in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease (pCD). Despite rates of reoperation being low, the risk of clinical or endoscopic post-operative recurrence (POR) is high; effective medical strategies to prevent POR are thus needed. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to identify and evaluate the published literature on post-operative medical prevention of POR in pCD to draft a possible therapy guide for pCD patients undergoing ICR. METHODS: We performed an SR according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards and registered it in the PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42024533855). The population, intervention, control, outcome (PICO) model was focussed on post-surgical medical prevention of POR in pCD with clearly expressed definition of recurrence (endoscopically using a standardized scoring system (e.g. Rutgeerts score) or by laboratory markers, for example, faecal calprotectin (F-CPT), C-reactive protein (CRP) or by histological findings or by clinical activity indexes [e.g. weighted paediatric Crohn's disease activity index - (w)PCDAI]. From inception until 29 February 2024, the following databases were searched: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus/Embase, Web of Sciences, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (including Cochrane), Cochrane Central Registrar of controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT. Retrieved articles were evaluated for eligibility and finally selected publications for risk of bias using ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS: Out of 811 publications identified by the search, only 5 fulfilled inclusion criteria of the SR. None of the studies fully answered our PICO question. The studies were overall of poor quality and the heterogeneity of the data did not allow us to perform meta-analysis, detailed statistical analysis or formal synthesis of data. Adverse events of post-operative medication were not described in any of the included studies. Existing guidelines of European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN), North American Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) were reviewed and paediatric therapy guide for pCD undergoing ICR was drafted with respect to recent SRs and meta-analyses in adult population and including scarce paediatric data identified by our SR. As pCD patients undergoing ICR are a high-risk population, they should not be left untreated post-operatively. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs should be considered as first-line therapy in the majority of patients. Non-anti-TNF biologics should be considered in case of anti-TNF failure. Regular endoscopic monitoring starting at 6 months after the surgery and supported by regular F-CPT evaluation should be used to identify early endoscopic recurrence and to escalate the treatment. CONCLUSION: Our SR revealed that there is wide variability in treatment strategies in children, and high-quality data are generally lacking. At the moment, paediatric prophylaxis of POR should be guided by available adult evidence with respect to the high-risk nature of pCD. Extensive research in pCD should be encouraged.
- MeSH
- cékum chirurgie MeSH
- Crohnova nemoc * chirurgie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- ileum chirurgie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační komplikace prevence a kontrola MeSH
- recidiva * MeSH
- sekundární prevence metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prehabilitation combines exercise, nutritional, and psychological interventions administered before surgery to improve patient outcomes. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis examined the feasibility, adherence, and effectiveness of prehabilitation in frail, high-risk individuals undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases to identify relevant studies evaluating prehabilitation programs published between 2010 and 2023, either as observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RESULTS: The 23 articles (13 RCTs and 10 observational studies) included 1849 older male and female patients aged 68.7 ± 7.2 years. Nineteen of the included studies reported on adherence to prehabilitation programmes, which was generally good (>75%) over different models, settings, and durations. Factors such as patients' desire for expedited surgery, self-assessment of fitness, personal and professional obligations, health issues, holidays, and advancement of surgery dates negatively affected adherence to prehabilitation programmes. When compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care, prehabilitation was associated with a 25%, albeit not statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications, according to data from 14 studies reporting on postoperative complications (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.17, P = 0.43; I2 = 65%). Prehabilitation has been found to improve the 6-min walk test significantly by 29.4 m (MD +29.4 m, 95% CI 5.6 to 53.3, P = 0.02; I2 = 39%), compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation was acceptable to patients, with good adherence, and improved physical function.
- MeSH
- adherence pacienta * MeSH
- břicho chirurgie MeSH
- fyzioterapie v předoperační přípravě * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační komplikace prevence a kontrola MeSH
- předoperační péče metody MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
Kaválny filter umožňuje zabrániť pľúcnej embólii mechanickým zachytením embolu v dolnej dutej žile. Mal by byť prísne indikovaný a implantovaný len vo vybranej skupine pacientov s hlbokou žilovou trombózou. Avšak zavedenie plejády relatívnych indikácií významne zvýšilo mieru implantácie kaválneho filtra v poslednej dekáde, čo samozrejme viedlo aj k neúmernému nárastu komplikácií. Účelom tohto článku je zosumari- zovať možné komplikácie súvisiace s používaním kaválneho filtra, predstaviť čitateľovi ich klinickú manifestáciu, nakoľko sú často prehliadané, a zároveň ukázať možnosti riešenia a liečby jednotlivých komplikácií.
The inferior vena cava filter prevents pulmonary embolism by mechanically trapping the embolus in the inferior vena cava. It should be strictly indicated and implanted only in a selected group of patients with deep vein thrombosis. However, the introduction of a plenty relative indications significantly increased the rate of caval filter implantation in the last decade and it led consequently to dramatic increase of complications rate, too. The purpose of this article is to summarize the possible complications related to the use of the caval filter, to present the reader clinical manifestation of these complications, as they are often overlooked, and to show the possibilities of solving and treating individual complications.
- MeSH
- antikoagulancia terapeutické užití MeSH
- diagnostické zobrazování metody MeSH
- kavální filtry * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- krvácení etiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- migrace cizích těles etiologie MeSH
- plicní embolie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- pooperační komplikace prevence a kontrola MeSH
- ruptura etiologie MeSH
- žilní tromboembolie * komplikace terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
Bezpečnost operovaných pacientů je důležitou a velmi sledovanou oblastí jak ze strany provozovatelů zdravotnických zařízení, tak ze strany pacientů i široké veřejnosti. Jednou z hlavních priorit managementu operačních sálů je kvalita perioperační péče a bezpečnost pacienta i personálu při realizaci operačního výkonu
The safety of patients undergoing surgery is an important and highly monitored area, both by healthcareproviders, and by patients as well as general public. One of the main priorities of operating theatre management is the quality of perioperative care and the safety of patients and staff during surgery.
Úvod: Studie zkoumá účinnost profylaktické implantace síťky při otevřené radikální cystektomii s použitím ileálního konduitu pro prevenci parastomálních hernií (PH). Přestože PH jsou častou komplikací, profylaktické metody jsou málo prozkoumány. Metody: Realizována byla pilotní monocentrická prospektivní kohortová studie. Zahrnovala 5 pacientů podstupujících operaci s implantací síťky. Sledovány byly demografické a klinické charakteristiky včetně výskytu PH, doby operace, krevních ztrát a doby hospitalizace. Výsledky: V rámci studie nebyl během průměrného sledovacího období 9,1±3,2 měsíce po operaci zaznamenán žádný výskyt PH ve skupině pacientů. Navzdory riziku spojenému s implantací cizího materiálu do oblasti operace s otevřeným tenkým střevem nebyly pozorovány žádné infekční komplikace. Závěr: Implantace síťky při radikální cystektomii s použitím ileálního konduitu se jeví jako účinná prevence PH. Pro definitivní potvrzení účinnosti a bezpečnosti síťky v dané situaci je však zapotřebí dalších rozsáhlejších studií.
Introduction: This study examines the efficacy of prophylactic mesh implantation during open radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion in preventing parastomal hernias (PH). Despite PH being a common complication, prophylactic methods have been underexplored. Methods: A pilot, single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted involving five patients undergoing surgery with mesh implantation. Demographic and clinical characteristics were monitored, including the incidence of PH, operation time, blood loss, and hospitalization duration. Results: During the mean follow-up period of 9.1±3.2 months post-operation, no occurrences of PH were observed in the patient group. Despite the risks associated with implanting foreign material in an area of surgery involving open small intestine, no infectious complications were noted. Conclusion: Prophylactic mesh implantation in radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion appears to be an effective preventive measure against PH. Further extensive studies are required to definitively confirm the efficacy and safety of mesh use in this context.
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky * aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- antibiotická profylaxe MeSH
- bakteriální infekce prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- perioperační péče metody MeSH
- pooperační komplikace prevence a kontrola MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
- stomatochirurgické výkony ošetřování MeSH
- stomatologické nemoci * farmakoterapie MeSH
- úrazy zubů farmakoterapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is significant potential to streamline the clinical pathway for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing BENCHMARK best practices on the efficiency and safety of TAVI in 28 sites in 7 European countries. METHODS: This was a study of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves before and after implementation of BENCHMARK best practices. Principal objectives were to reduce hospital length of stay (LoS) and duration of intensive care stay. Secondary objective was to document patient safety. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and March 2023, 897 patients were documented prior to and 1491 patients after the implementation of BENCHMARK practices. Patient characteristics were consistent with a known older TAVI population and only minor differences. Mean LoS was reduced from 7.7 ± 7.0 to 5.8 ± 5.6 days (median 6 vs. 4 days; P < .001). Duration of intensive care was reduced from 1.8 to 1.3 days (median 1.1 vs. 0.9 days; P < .001). Adoption of peri-procedure best practices led to increased use of local anaesthesia (96.1% vs. 84.3%; P < .001) and decreased procedure (median 47 vs. 60 min; P < .001) and intervention times (85 vs. 95 min; P < .001). Thirty-day patient safety did not appear to be compromised with no differences in all-cause mortality (0.6% in both groups combined), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (1.4%), life-threatening bleeding (1.3%), stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (0.7%), and valve-related readmission (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Broad implementation of BENCHMARK practices contributes to improving efficiency of TAVI pathway reducing LoS and costs without compromising patient safety.
- MeSH
- aortální stenóza * chirurgie MeSH
- benchmarking * MeSH
- bezpečnost pacientů MeSH
- délka pobytu * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- kritické cesty MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační komplikace epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- transkatetrální implantace aortální chlopně * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Prehabilitation comprises multidisciplinary preoperative interventions including exercise, nutritional optimisation and psychological preparation aimed at improving surgical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Embase, Medline, CINAHAL and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating unimodal (exercise) or multimodal prehabilitation programmes. Meta-analysis was limited to length of stay (primary end point), severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ Grade 3) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The analysis was performed using RevMan v5.4 software. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 10 observational) reporting on 3339 patients (1468 prehabilitation group, 1871 control group) were included. The median (interquartile range) age was 74.0 (71.0-78.4) years. Multimodal prehabilitation was applied in fifteen studies and unimodal in one. Meta-analysis of nine studies showed a reduction in hospital length of stay (weighted mean difference -1.07 days, 95 % CI -1.60 to -0.53 days, P < 0.0001, I2 = 19 %). Ten studies addressed severe complications and a meta-analysis suggested a decline in occurrence by up to 44 % (odds ratio 0.56, 95 % CI 0.37 to 0.82, P < 0.004, I2 = 51 %). Four studies provided data on preoperative 6MWT. The pooled weighted mean difference was 40.1 m (95 % CI 32.7 to 47.6 m, P < 0.00001, I2 = 24 %), favouring prehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Given the significant impact on shortening length of stay and reducing severe complications, prehabilitation should be encouraged in frail, older and high-risk adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
