• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Exploring the acceptability of and adherence to prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A. Alsuwaylihi, P. Skořepa, CM. Prado, D. Gomez, DN. Lobo, D. O'Connor

. 2024 ; 63 (-) : 709-726. [pub] 20240813

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled, metaanalýza

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24018760

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prehabilitation combines exercise, nutritional, and psychological interventions administered before surgery to improve patient outcomes. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis examined the feasibility, adherence, and effectiveness of prehabilitation in frail, high-risk individuals undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases to identify relevant studies evaluating prehabilitation programs published between 2010 and 2023, either as observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RESULTS: The 23 articles (13 RCTs and 10 observational studies) included 1849 older male and female patients aged 68.7 ± 7.2 years. Nineteen of the included studies reported on adherence to prehabilitation programmes, which was generally good (>75%) over different models, settings, and durations. Factors such as patients' desire for expedited surgery, self-assessment of fitness, personal and professional obligations, health issues, holidays, and advancement of surgery dates negatively affected adherence to prehabilitation programmes. When compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care, prehabilitation was associated with a 25%, albeit not statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications, according to data from 14 studies reporting on postoperative complications (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.17, P = 0.43; I2 = 65%). Prehabilitation has been found to improve the 6-min walk test significantly by 29.4 m (MD +29.4 m, 95% CI 5.6 to 53.3, P = 0.02; I2 = 39%), compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation was acceptable to patients, with good adherence, and improved physical function.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24018760
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024111340.0
007      
ta
008      
241015e20240813enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.07.1060 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39142632
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Alsuwaylihi, Abdulaziz $u Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Division of Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; Department of Clinical Nutrition, King Saud Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/AbdulAz1z4_4
245    10
$a Exploring the acceptability of and adherence to prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis / $c A. Alsuwaylihi, P. Skořepa, CM. Prado, D. Gomez, DN. Lobo, D. O'Connor
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prehabilitation combines exercise, nutritional, and psychological interventions administered before surgery to improve patient outcomes. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis examined the feasibility, adherence, and effectiveness of prehabilitation in frail, high-risk individuals undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases to identify relevant studies evaluating prehabilitation programs published between 2010 and 2023, either as observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RESULTS: The 23 articles (13 RCTs and 10 observational studies) included 1849 older male and female patients aged 68.7 ± 7.2 years. Nineteen of the included studies reported on adherence to prehabilitation programmes, which was generally good (>75%) over different models, settings, and durations. Factors such as patients' desire for expedited surgery, self-assessment of fitness, personal and professional obligations, health issues, holidays, and advancement of surgery dates negatively affected adherence to prehabilitation programmes. When compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care, prehabilitation was associated with a 25%, albeit not statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications, according to data from 14 studies reporting on postoperative complications (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.17, P = 0.43; I2 = 65%). Prehabilitation has been found to improve the 6-min walk test significantly by 29.4 m (MD +29.4 m, 95% CI 5.6 to 53.3, P = 0.02; I2 = 39%), compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation was acceptable to patients, with good adherence, and improved physical function.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a fyzioterapie v předoperační přípravě $7 D000082622
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a adherence pacienta $7 D010349
650    _2
$a břicho $x chirurgie $7 D000005
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a předoperační péče $x metody $7 D011300
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011183
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
700    1_
$a Skořepa, Pavel $u Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Division of Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; University of Defence, Military Faculty of Medicine, Department of Military Internal Medicine and Military Hygiene, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; 3rd Department of Internal Medicine-Metabolic Care and Gerontology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Pavel_Skorepa_
700    1_
$a Prado, Carla M $u Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/DrCarlaPrado
700    1_
$a Gomez, Dhanny $u Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Division of Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
700    1_
$a Lobo, Dileep N $u Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Division of Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK; Divison of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: Dileep.Lobo@nottingham.ac.uk
700    1_
$a O'Connor, Dominic $u School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Dom_OConnor1
773    0_
$w MED00205669 $t Clinical nutrition ESPEN $x 2405-4577 $g Roč. 63 (20240813), s. 709-726
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39142632 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024111334 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2201556 $s 1230733
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 63 $c - $d 709-726 $e 20240813 $i 2405-4577 $m Clinical nutrition ESPEN $n Clin Nutr ESPEN $x MED00205669
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...