Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Iatrogenic ureteric injury during abdominal or pelvic surgery: a meta-analysis

T. Yanagisawa, K. Mori, F. Quhal, T. Kawada, H. Mostafaei, E. Laukhtina, P. Rajwa, R. Sari Motlagh, A. Aydh, F. König, M. Pallauf, B. Pradere, J. Miki, T. Kimura, S. Egawa, SF. Shariat

. 2023 ; 131 (5) : 540-552. [pub] 20221018

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23011659

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of ureteric injuries, clinical value of prophylactic ureteric stenting and impact of intra- or postoperative detection of ureteric injuries in patients treated with gynaecological or colorectal surgery. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before September 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated the differences in the rate of ureteric injuries between laparoscopic and open surgery, prophylactic ureteric stenting or not, and those of final treatment success between intra- and postoperative detection in patients who underwent gynaecological or colorectal surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 46 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher incidence of ureteric injuries (pooled odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-2.62), but there was no statistically significant difference in colectomy (pooled OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03). Prophylactic ureteric stenting was associated with a lower incidence of ureteric injuries during gynaecological surgery (pooled OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). The number needed to perform ureteric stenting to prevent one ureteric injury was 224 in gynaecological surgery. On the other hand, prophylactic ureteric stenting did not reduce the risk of ureteric injuries during colorectal surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury was associated with a lower rate of complication management failure compared to postoperative detection (pooled OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy seems to be associated with a higher rate of ureteric injuries compared to an open approach. Prophylactic ureteric stenting seems to reduce this risk during gynaecological surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury during abdominal/pelvic surgery improves outcomes, suggesting the need for awareness and proactive problem identification. Further well-designed studies assessing the candidates who are more likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteric stenting including cost analysis are needed.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23011659
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230801133231.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/bju.15913 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36196670
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Yanagisawa, Takafumi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000274100712
245    10
$a Iatrogenic ureteric injury during abdominal or pelvic surgery: a meta-analysis / $c T. Yanagisawa, K. Mori, F. Quhal, T. Kawada, H. Mostafaei, E. Laukhtina, P. Rajwa, R. Sari Motlagh, A. Aydh, F. König, M. Pallauf, B. Pradere, J. Miki, T. Kimura, S. Egawa, SF. Shariat
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of ureteric injuries, clinical value of prophylactic ureteric stenting and impact of intra- or postoperative detection of ureteric injuries in patients treated with gynaecological or colorectal surgery. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before September 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated the differences in the rate of ureteric injuries between laparoscopic and open surgery, prophylactic ureteric stenting or not, and those of final treatment success between intra- and postoperative detection in patients who underwent gynaecological or colorectal surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 46 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher incidence of ureteric injuries (pooled odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-2.62), but there was no statistically significant difference in colectomy (pooled OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03). Prophylactic ureteric stenting was associated with a lower incidence of ureteric injuries during gynaecological surgery (pooled OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). The number needed to perform ureteric stenting to prevent one ureteric injury was 224 in gynaecological surgery. On the other hand, prophylactic ureteric stenting did not reduce the risk of ureteric injuries during colorectal surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury was associated with a lower rate of complication management failure compared to postoperative detection (pooled OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy seems to be associated with a higher rate of ureteric injuries compared to an open approach. Prophylactic ureteric stenting seems to reduce this risk during gynaecological surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury during abdominal/pelvic surgery improves outcomes, suggesting the need for awareness and proactive problem identification. Further well-designed studies assessing the candidates who are more likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteric stenting including cost analysis are needed.
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a ureter $x chirurgie $x zranění $7 D014513
650    12
$a urologické nemoci $x chirurgie $7 D014570
650    12
$a laparoskopie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D010535
650    _2
$a gynekologické chirurgické výkony $7 D013509
650    _2
$a iatrogenní nemoci $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D007049
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Mori, Keiichiro $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000261476569
700    1_
$a Quhal, Fahad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000281636953
700    1_
$a Kawada, Tatsushi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000283699712
700    1_
$a Mostafaei, Hadi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran $1 https://orcid.org/0000000155961771
700    1_
$a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000289530272
700    1_
$a Rajwa, Pawel $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000340736584
700    1_
$a Sari Motlagh, Reza $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran $1 https://orcid.org/0000000238199911
700    1_
$a Aydh, Abdulmajeed $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
700    1_
$a König, Frederik $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Pallauf, Maximilian $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000284964506
700    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Miki, Jun $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000246388640
700    1_
$a Kimura, Takahiro $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000256731553
700    1_
$a Egawa, Shin $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
773    0_
$w MED00011371 $t BJU international $x 1464-410X $g Roč. 131, č. 5 (2023), s. 540-552
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36196670 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230801133227 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963854 $s 1197924
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 131 $c 5 $d 540-552 $e 20221018 $i 1464-410X $m BJU international $n BJU Int $x MED00011371
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace