-
Something wrong with this record ?
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Predicting Upper Urinary Tract Recurrence After Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Bladder Cancer
M. Kardoust Parizi, V. Margulis, Y. Lotan, A. Aydh, SF. Shariat
Language English Country United States
Document type Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article, Review
- MeSH
- Cystectomy methods MeSH
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * surgery pathology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local epidemiology surgery MeSH
- Urinary Tract * pathology MeSH
- Urinary Bladder pathology MeSH
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * surgery pathology MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Models, Statistical MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
To identify risk factors for upper urinary tract recurrence (UUTR) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC). The PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched on March 2022 to identify relevant studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that provided multivariate logistic regression analyses. The pooled UUTR rate was calculated using a fixed effect model. We identified 235 papers, of which seven and 6 articles, comprising a total of 8981 and 8404 UBC patients, were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. Overall, 418 (4.65%) patients were diagnosed with UUTR within a median time of 1.4 to 3.1 years after RC. Risk factors for UUTR were surgical margin (hazard ratio [HR] 3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-4.49, P < .00001), preoperative hydronephrosis (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.25-2.43, P = .001), ureteral margin (HR: 4.34, 95% CI: 2.75-6.85, P < .00001), and pT stage (HR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.37-5.27, P < .004). Incorporation of established risk factors into a clinical prediction model might aid in the decision-making process regarding the intensity and type of surveillance protocols after RC as well as help determine the pretest probability of UUTR.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prag Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology King Faisal Medical City Abha Saudi Arabia
Department of Urology Shariati Hospital Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX
Departments of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23011319
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801132947.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.002 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36513557
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kardoust Parizi, Mehdi $u Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 245 12
- $a A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Predicting Upper Urinary Tract Recurrence After Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Bladder Cancer / $c M. Kardoust Parizi, V. Margulis, Y. Lotan, A. Aydh, SF. Shariat
- 520 9_
- $a To identify risk factors for upper urinary tract recurrence (UUTR) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC). The PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched on March 2022 to identify relevant studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that provided multivariate logistic regression analyses. The pooled UUTR rate was calculated using a fixed effect model. We identified 235 papers, of which seven and 6 articles, comprising a total of 8981 and 8404 UBC patients, were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. Overall, 418 (4.65%) patients were diagnosed with UUTR within a median time of 1.4 to 3.1 years after RC. Risk factors for UUTR were surgical margin (hazard ratio [HR] 3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-4.49, P < .00001), preoperative hydronephrosis (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.25-2.43, P = .001), ureteral margin (HR: 4.34, 95% CI: 2.75-6.85, P < .00001), and pT stage (HR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.37-5.27, P < .004). Incorporation of established risk factors into a clinical prediction model might aid in the decision-making process regarding the intensity and type of surveillance protocols after RC as well as help determine the pretest probability of UUTR.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a močový měchýř $x patologie $7 D001743
- 650 _2
- $a cystektomie $x metody $7 D015653
- 650 _2
- $a statistické modely $7 D015233
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D001749
- 650 12
- $a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D002295
- 650 12
- $a močové ústrojí $x patologie $7 D014551
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D009364
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Margulis, Vitaly $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- 700 1_
- $a Lotan, Yair $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- 700 1_
- $a Aydh, Abdulmajeed $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan. Electronic address: sfshariat@gmail.com
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188741 $t Clinical genitourinary cancer $x 1938-0682 $g Roč. 21, č. 3 (2023), s. 317-323
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36513557 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801132944 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963618 $s 1197584
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 21 $c 3 $d 317-323 $e 20221113 $i 1938-0682 $m Clinical genitourinary cancer $n Clin Genitourin Cancer $x MED00188741
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718