• Something wrong with this record ?

The oxidation status of three types of duck meat (conventional, organic, wild) during refrigerated storage under air and vacuum-packaged atmospheres

FAA. Abdullah, H. Buchtová, F. Ježek

. 2022 ; 63 (4) : 528-534. [pub] 20220216

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

1. This study evaluated and compared the oxidation status of meat from conventionally-farmed, organic and wild ducks during chilled storage in air or vacuum packaging. In total, 48 carcases from each group of ducks were investigated, and 24 carcases from each type of production were stored under vacuum or in air at 3°C ± 1°C. Sample analyses were conducted after 1, 3, 6 and 9 d of storage.2. The antioxidant capacity (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl: DPPH), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and free fatty acids in the breast, thigh and wing muscles were determined.3. The antioxidant capacity of meat from conventional ducks was higher than that from organic and wild ducks. The muscles of organic and wild ducks were more susceptible to secondary oxidation (particularly when stored in air) than conventionally-raised birds. The free fatty acid levels in samples of breast and thigh meat from wild ducks on the last day of storage were higher than in conventional and organic ducks.4. The results showed that the oxidation status of meat from conventional ducks was more stable during refrigerated storage than the meat of organic and wild ducks.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024977
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100058.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/00071668.2022.2035674 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35107343
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Abdullah, F A A $u Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Origin Food & Gastronomic Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
245    14
$a The oxidation status of three types of duck meat (conventional, organic, wild) during refrigerated storage under air and vacuum-packaged atmospheres / $c FAA. Abdullah, H. Buchtová, F. Ježek
520    9_
$a 1. This study evaluated and compared the oxidation status of meat from conventionally-farmed, organic and wild ducks during chilled storage in air or vacuum packaging. In total, 48 carcases from each group of ducks were investigated, and 24 carcases from each type of production were stored under vacuum or in air at 3°C ± 1°C. Sample analyses were conducted after 1, 3, 6 and 9 d of storage.2. The antioxidant capacity (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl: DPPH), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and free fatty acids in the breast, thigh and wing muscles were determined.3. The antioxidant capacity of meat from conventional ducks was higher than that from organic and wild ducks. The muscles of organic and wild ducks were more susceptible to secondary oxidation (particularly when stored in air) than conventionally-raised birds. The free fatty acid levels in samples of breast and thigh meat from wild ducks on the last day of storage were higher than in conventional and organic ducks.4. The results showed that the oxidation status of meat from conventional ducks was more stable during refrigerated storage than the meat of organic and wild ducks.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a antioxidancia $x analýza $7 D000975
650    _2
$a atmosféra $x analýza $7 D001272
650    _2
$a kur domácí $7 D002645
650    12
$a kachny $7 D004372
650    12
$a obaly potravin $x metody $7 D018857
650    _2
$a maso $x analýza $7 D008460
650    _2
$a vakuum $7 D014618
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Buchtová, H $u Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Origin Food & Gastronomic Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ježek, F $u Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Origin Food & Gastronomic Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00181703 $t British poultry science $x 1466-1799 $g Roč. 63, č. 4 (2022), s. 528-534
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35107343 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100056 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854596 $s 1176267
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 63 $c 4 $d 528-534 $e 20220216 $i 1466-1799 $m British poultry science $n Br Poult Sci $x MED00181703
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...