-
Something wrong with this record ?
The oxidation status of three types of duck meat (conventional, organic, wild) during refrigerated storage under air and vacuum-packaged atmospheres
FAA. Abdullah, H. Buchtová, F. Ježek
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Antioxidants analysis MeSH
- Atmosphere analysis MeSH
- Ducks * MeSH
- Chickens MeSH
- Meat analysis MeSH
- Food Packaging * methods MeSH
- Vacuum MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
1. This study evaluated and compared the oxidation status of meat from conventionally-farmed, organic and wild ducks during chilled storage in air or vacuum packaging. In total, 48 carcases from each group of ducks were investigated, and 24 carcases from each type of production were stored under vacuum or in air at 3°C ± 1°C. Sample analyses were conducted after 1, 3, 6 and 9 d of storage.2. The antioxidant capacity (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl: DPPH), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and free fatty acids in the breast, thigh and wing muscles were determined.3. The antioxidant capacity of meat from conventional ducks was higher than that from organic and wild ducks. The muscles of organic and wild ducks were more susceptible to secondary oxidation (particularly when stored in air) than conventionally-raised birds. The free fatty acid levels in samples of breast and thigh meat from wild ducks on the last day of storage were higher than in conventional and organic ducks.4. The results showed that the oxidation status of meat from conventional ducks was more stable during refrigerated storage than the meat of organic and wild ducks.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22024977
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100058.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/00071668.2022.2035674 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35107343
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Abdullah, F A A $u Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Origin Food & Gastronomic Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The oxidation status of three types of duck meat (conventional, organic, wild) during refrigerated storage under air and vacuum-packaged atmospheres / $c FAA. Abdullah, H. Buchtová, F. Ježek
- 520 9_
- $a 1. This study evaluated and compared the oxidation status of meat from conventionally-farmed, organic and wild ducks during chilled storage in air or vacuum packaging. In total, 48 carcases from each group of ducks were investigated, and 24 carcases from each type of production were stored under vacuum or in air at 3°C ± 1°C. Sample analyses were conducted after 1, 3, 6 and 9 d of storage.2. The antioxidant capacity (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl: DPPH), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and free fatty acids in the breast, thigh and wing muscles were determined.3. The antioxidant capacity of meat from conventional ducks was higher than that from organic and wild ducks. The muscles of organic and wild ducks were more susceptible to secondary oxidation (particularly when stored in air) than conventionally-raised birds. The free fatty acid levels in samples of breast and thigh meat from wild ducks on the last day of storage were higher than in conventional and organic ducks.4. The results showed that the oxidation status of meat from conventional ducks was more stable during refrigerated storage than the meat of organic and wild ducks.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a antioxidancia $x analýza $7 D000975
- 650 _2
- $a atmosféra $x analýza $7 D001272
- 650 _2
- $a kur domácí $7 D002645
- 650 12
- $a kachny $7 D004372
- 650 12
- $a obaly potravin $x metody $7 D018857
- 650 _2
- $a maso $x analýza $7 D008460
- 650 _2
- $a vakuum $7 D014618
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Buchtová, H $u Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Origin Food & Gastronomic Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ježek, F $u Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Origin Food & Gastronomic Sciences, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181703 $t British poultry science $x 1466-1799 $g Roč. 63, č. 4 (2022), s. 528-534
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35107343 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100056 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854596 $s 1176267
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 63 $c 4 $d 528-534 $e 20220216 $i 1466-1799 $m British poultry science $n Br Poult Sci $x MED00181703
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017