• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Laparoscopic synthetic mesh explantation after sacrohysteropexy

Z. Rusavy, Y. Abdelkhalek, B. Najib, B. Deval

. 2022 ; 33 (7) : 2049-2051. [pub] 20220307

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu kazuistiky, časopisecké články, audiovizuální média

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22025323
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2010-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

INTRODUCTION: In this video, we present a case of rectal and bladder injury, which occurred during laparoscopic mesh removal following sacrohysteropexy treated 6 months later with a laparoscopic pectopexy. METHODS: We present the case of a 66-year-old woman with a prolapse recurrence after sacrohysteropexy. During the laparoscopic explantation of the mesh, we detected a fixation of the mesh to the bladder and the rectum rather than a fixation to the vaginal walls. Consequently, bladder and rectal injuries occurred during the dissection and were diagnosed and repaired immediately. Due to bowel injury, the treatment of the prolapse was postponed. Six months later, a laparoscopic pectopexy was performed to avoid complications during the repeated dissection of the promontory. The postoperative recovery after the pectopexy was uncomplicated with no short-term prolapse recurrence or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy appears to be an efficient approach to mesh explantation. Futhermore, laparoscopic pectopexy seems to be a good approach to secondary prolapse reconstruction after sacrohysteropexy mesh explantation avoiding complications during repeated dissection of the promontory.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22025323
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100133.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00192-022-05141-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35254472
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Rusavy, Zdenek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. rusavyz@fnplzen.cz $u Department of Functional Pelvic Surgery & Oncology, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Ramsay, Générale de Santé, Paris, France. rusavyz@fnplzen.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000171259819
245    10
$a Laparoscopic synthetic mesh explantation after sacrohysteropexy / $c Z. Rusavy, Y. Abdelkhalek, B. Najib, B. Deval
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: In this video, we present a case of rectal and bladder injury, which occurred during laparoscopic mesh removal following sacrohysteropexy treated 6 months later with a laparoscopic pectopexy. METHODS: We present the case of a 66-year-old woman with a prolapse recurrence after sacrohysteropexy. During the laparoscopic explantation of the mesh, we detected a fixation of the mesh to the bladder and the rectum rather than a fixation to the vaginal walls. Consequently, bladder and rectal injuries occurred during the dissection and were diagnosed and repaired immediately. Due to bowel injury, the treatment of the prolapse was postponed. Six months later, a laparoscopic pectopexy was performed to avoid complications during the repeated dissection of the promontory. The postoperative recovery after the pectopexy was uncomplicated with no short-term prolapse recurrence or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy appears to be an efficient approach to mesh explantation. Futhermore, laparoscopic pectopexy seems to be a good approach to secondary prolapse reconstruction after sacrohysteropexy mesh explantation avoiding complications during repeated dissection of the promontory.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a odstranění implantátu $7 D020878
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a laparoskopie $7 D010535
650    12
$a prolaps pánevních orgánů $x chirurgie $7 D056887
650    _2
$a rektum $x zranění $7 D012007
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
650    12
$a chirurgické síťky $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013526
650    _2
$a močový měchýř $x zranění $7 D001743
655    _2
$a kazuistiky $7 D002363
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a audiovizuální média $7 D059040
700    1_
$a Abdelkhalek, Yara $u Department of Functional Pelvic Surgery & Oncology, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Ramsay, Générale de Santé, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Najib, Bernard $u Department of Functional Pelvic Surgery & Oncology, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Ramsay, Générale de Santé, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Deval, Bruno $u Department of Functional Pelvic Surgery & Oncology, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Ramsay, Générale de Santé, Paris, France
773    0_
$w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 33, č. 7 (2022), s. 2049-2051
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35254472 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100131 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854836 $s 1176613
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 33 $c 7 $d 2049-2051 $e 20220307 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...