-
Something wrong with this record ?
Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR detection in women treated for ectopic pregnancy
J. Racková, J. Záhumenský, M. Zikán, E. Menzlová, B. Sehnal
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Chlamydia trachomatis MeSH
- Chlamydia Infections * complications diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy, Ectopic * diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Neisseria gonorrhoeae MeSH
- Pelvic Inflammatory Disease * complications MeSH
- Polymerase Chain Reaction MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Inflammation complications MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The aim of this study was to determine the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis (ChT) and Neisseria gonorrhoae (NG) in the genital tract of women with ectopic pregnancy and to compare the positive results with patients' self-reported history of PID. Overall 40 women were eligible for the study. The samples for the ChT and NG Polymerase Chain-reaction (PCR) detection were obtained from the cervix, endometrium and fallopian tube. The results of testing for NG at all sites were negative as were the results from cervical testing for ChT. The prevalence of ChT in the upper genital tract was 12.5%. No statistically significant correlation was found between the positive cases and the previous signs of PID and laparoscopic findings. We found statistically significant relationship between signs of pelvic inflammation in a pacients' history and histopathological findings of tubal inflammation. 12.5% prevalence of ChT confirms the ascending genital infection. There was no association between the positive PCR result and clinical history of pelvic inflammation.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic inflammatory disease, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoae infections are the main risks for ectopic pregnancy. Clinical history of PID and perioperative adhesions may suggest prior upper genital infection.What do the results of this study add?Chlamydia trachomatis positive PCR result can be found in the upper genital tract without the positivity of cervical smear in women with ectopic pregnancy. Our study is unique in assessing the endometrial biopsy for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoae.What are the implications of these findings for future clinical practice and/or future clinical research? There is no statistically significant association between positive PCR result and clinical history of PID or pelvic adhesions found during laparoscopy for tubal pregnancy. Therefore there is no need for the preventive antibiotic treatment in patients with these findings.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025335
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100134.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/01443615.2021.1979947 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34904517
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Racková, Jana $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bulovka, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR detection in women treated for ectopic pregnancy / $c J. Racková, J. Záhumenský, M. Zikán, E. Menzlová, B. Sehnal
- 520 9_
- $a The aim of this study was to determine the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis (ChT) and Neisseria gonorrhoae (NG) in the genital tract of women with ectopic pregnancy and to compare the positive results with patients' self-reported history of PID. Overall 40 women were eligible for the study. The samples for the ChT and NG Polymerase Chain-reaction (PCR) detection were obtained from the cervix, endometrium and fallopian tube. The results of testing for NG at all sites were negative as were the results from cervical testing for ChT. The prevalence of ChT in the upper genital tract was 12.5%. No statistically significant correlation was found between the positive cases and the previous signs of PID and laparoscopic findings. We found statistically significant relationship between signs of pelvic inflammation in a pacients' history and histopathological findings of tubal inflammation. 12.5% prevalence of ChT confirms the ascending genital infection. There was no association between the positive PCR result and clinical history of pelvic inflammation.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Pelvic inflammatory disease, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoae infections are the main risks for ectopic pregnancy. Clinical history of PID and perioperative adhesions may suggest prior upper genital infection.What do the results of this study add?Chlamydia trachomatis positive PCR result can be found in the upper genital tract without the positivity of cervical smear in women with ectopic pregnancy. Our study is unique in assessing the endometrial biopsy for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoae.What are the implications of these findings for future clinical practice and/or future clinical research? There is no statistically significant association between positive PCR result and clinical history of PID or pelvic adhesions found during laparoscopy for tubal pregnancy. Therefore there is no need for the preventive antibiotic treatment in patients with these findings.
- 650 12
- $a chlamydiové infekce $x komplikace $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D002690
- 650 _2
- $a Chlamydia trachomatis $7 D002692
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a zánět $x komplikace $7 D007249
- 650 _2
- $a Neisseria gonorrhoeae $7 D009344
- 650 12
- $a pánevní zánět $x komplikace $7 D000292
- 650 _2
- $a polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D016133
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 12
- $a mimoděložní těhotenství $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D011271
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Záhumenský, Jozef $u 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bratislava and Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zikán, Michael $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bulovka, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Menzlová, Erika $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bulovka, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sehnal, Borek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bulovka, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002860 $t Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology $x 1364-6893 $g Roč. 42, č. 5 (2022), s. 1370-1373
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34904517 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100132 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854845 $s 1176625
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 42 $c 5 $d 1370-1373 $e 20211214 $i 1364-6893 $m Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology $n J Obstet Gynaecol $x MED00002860
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017