-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Accuracy of Frozen Section Analysis of Urethral and Ureteral Margins During Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
E. Laukhtina, P. Rajwa, K. Mori, M. Moschini, D. D'Andrea, M. Abufaraj, F. Soria, A. Mari, W. Krajewski, S. Albisinni, JY. Teoh, F. Quhal, R. Sari Motlagh, H. Mostafaei, S. Katayama, NC. Grossmann, D. Enikeev, K. Zimmermann, H. Fajkovic, P....
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, přehledy, systematický přehled, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- cystektomie MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * diagnóza patologie chirurgie MeSH
- resekční okraje MeSH
- ureter * patologie chirurgie MeSH
- zmrazené řezy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
CONTEXT: The question of the ability of frozen section analysis (FSA) to accurately detect malignant pathology intraoperatively has been discussed for many decades. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diagnostic estimates of FSA of the urethral and ureteral margins in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in February 2021 for studies analyzing the association between FSA and the final urethral and ureteral margin status in patients treated with RC for BCa. The primary endpoint was the value of pathologic detection of urethral and ureteral malignant involvement with FSA during RC compared with the final margin status. We included studies that provided true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative values for FSA, which allowed us to calculate the diagnostic estimates. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Fourteen studies, comprising 8208 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. Forest plots revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity for FSA of urethral margins during RC were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.97), respectively. While for the FSA of ureteral margins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.84) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), respectively. Calculated diagnostic odds ratios indicated high FSA effectiveness, and patients with a positive urethral or ureteral margin at final pathology are over 100 times more likely to have positive FSA than patients without margin involvement at final pathology. Area under the curves of 96.6% and 96.7% were reached for FSA detection of urethral and ureteral tumor involvement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative FSA demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting both urethral and ureteral malignant involvement at the time of RC for BCa. FSA of both urethral and ureteral margins during RC is accurate enough to be of great value in the routine management of BCa patients treated with RC. While its specificity was great to guide intraoperative decision-making, its sensitivity remains suboptimal yet. PATIENT SUMMARY: We believe that the frozen section analysis of both urethral and ureteral margins during radical cystectomy should be considered more often in urologic practice, until quality of life-based cost-effectiveness studies can identify patients within each institution who are unlikely to benefit from it.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology Wrocław Medical University Wroclaw Poland
Department of Urology Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz Koblenz Germany
Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia
Department of Urology Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran
S H Ho Urology Centre Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
Service d'Urologie Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025448
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100416.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.010 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34127436
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- 245 10
- $a Accuracy of Frozen Section Analysis of Urethral and Ureteral Margins During Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis / $c E. Laukhtina, P. Rajwa, K. Mori, M. Moschini, D. D'Andrea, M. Abufaraj, F. Soria, A. Mari, W. Krajewski, S. Albisinni, JY. Teoh, F. Quhal, R. Sari Motlagh, H. Mostafaei, S. Katayama, NC. Grossmann, D. Enikeev, K. Zimmermann, H. Fajkovic, P. Glybochko, SF. Shariat, B. Pradere, European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group (EAU YAU)
- 520 9_
- $a CONTEXT: The question of the ability of frozen section analysis (FSA) to accurately detect malignant pathology intraoperatively has been discussed for many decades. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diagnostic estimates of FSA of the urethral and ureteral margins in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in February 2021 for studies analyzing the association between FSA and the final urethral and ureteral margin status in patients treated with RC for BCa. The primary endpoint was the value of pathologic detection of urethral and ureteral malignant involvement with FSA during RC compared with the final margin status. We included studies that provided true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative values for FSA, which allowed us to calculate the diagnostic estimates. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Fourteen studies, comprising 8208 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. Forest plots revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity for FSA of urethral margins during RC were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.97), respectively. While for the FSA of ureteral margins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.84) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), respectively. Calculated diagnostic odds ratios indicated high FSA effectiveness, and patients with a positive urethral or ureteral margin at final pathology are over 100 times more likely to have positive FSA than patients without margin involvement at final pathology. Area under the curves of 96.6% and 96.7% were reached for FSA detection of urethral and ureteral tumor involvement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative FSA demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting both urethral and ureteral malignant involvement at the time of RC for BCa. FSA of both urethral and ureteral margins during RC is accurate enough to be of great value in the routine management of BCa patients treated with RC. While its specificity was great to guide intraoperative decision-making, its sensitivity remains suboptimal yet. PATIENT SUMMARY: We believe that the frozen section analysis of both urethral and ureteral margins during radical cystectomy should be considered more often in urologic practice, until quality of life-based cost-effectiveness studies can identify patients within each institution who are unlikely to benefit from it.
- 650 _2
- $a cystektomie $7 D015653
- 650 _2
- $a zmrazené řezy $7 D005629
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a resekční okraje $7 D000072662
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 12
- $a ureter $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D014513
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x diagnóza $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D001749
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Rajwa, Pawel $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Mori, Keiichiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Moschini, Marco $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a D'Andrea, David $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Abufaraj, Mohammad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- 700 1_
- $a Soria, Francesco $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Mari, Andrea $u Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Krajewski, Wojciech $u Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Albisinni, Simone $u Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun $u S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- 700 1_
- $a Quhal, Fahad $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
- 700 1_
- $a Sari Motlagh, Reza $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a Mostafaei, Hadi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a Katayama, Satoshi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Grossmann, Nico C $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Enikeev, Dmitry $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- 700 1_
- $a Zimmermann, Kristin $u Department of Urology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Fajkovic, Harun $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Glybochko, Petr $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at
- 700 1_
- $a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 710 2_
- $a European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group (EAU YAU)
- 773 0_
- $w MED00193513 $t European urology focus $x 2405-4569 $g Roč. 8, č. 3 (2022), s. 752-760
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34127436 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100414 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854919 $s 1176738
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 8 $c 3 $d 752-760 $e 20210612 $i 2405-4569 $m European urology focus $n Eur Urol Focus $x MED00193513
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017
