-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management
N. Krajnc, G. Bsteh, T. Berger, J. Mares, HP. Hartung
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
NLK
PubMed Central
od 2007
Europe PubMed Central
od 2007 do Před 1 rokem
ProQuest Central
od 2007-01-01 do 2023-10-31
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2007-01-01 do 2023-10-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2007-01-01 do 2023-10-31
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2007-01-01 do 2023-10-31
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- natalizumab terapeutické užití MeSH
- protinádorové látky imunologicky aktivní * terapeutické užití MeSH
- řízení rizik MeSH
- roztroušená skleróza * terapie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- vakcinace MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.
Brain and Mind Center University of Sydney Sydney Australia
Department of Neurology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Neurology Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025467
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100859.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s13311-022-01224-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35378683
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Krajnc, Nik $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 245 10
- $a Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management / $c N. Krajnc, G. Bsteh, T. Berger, J. Mares, HP. Hartung
- 520 9_
- $a Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.
- 650 _2
- $a monoklonální protilátky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000911
- 650 12
- $a protinádorové látky imunologicky aktivní $x terapeutické užití $7 D000074322
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a roztroušená skleróza $x terapie $7 D009103
- 650 _2
- $a natalizumab $x terapeutické užití $7 D000069442
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a řízení rizik $7 D012308
- 650 _2
- $a vakcinace $7 D014611
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Bsteh, Gabriel $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Berger, Thomas $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Mares, Jan $u Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hartung, Hans-Peter $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $u Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $u Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $u Brain and Mind Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $1 https://orcid.org/0000000206146989
- 773 0_
- $w MED00167290 $t Neurotherapeutics $x 1878-7479 $g Roč. 19, č. 3 (2022), s. 753-773
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35378683 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100856 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854934 $s 1176757
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 19 $c 3 $d 753-773 $e 20220404 $i 1878-7479 $m Neurotherapeutics $n Neurotherapeutics $x MED00167290
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017