• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management

N. Krajnc, G. Bsteh, T. Berger, J. Mares, HP. Hartung

. 2022 ; 19 (3) : 753-773. [pub] 20220404

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22025467
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK PubMed Central od 2007
Europe PubMed Central od 2007 do Před 1 rokem
ProQuest Central od 2007-01-01 do 2023-10-31
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2007-01-01 do 2023-10-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2007-01-01 do 2023-10-31
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 2007-01-01 do 2023-10-31

Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22025467
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100859.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s13311-022-01224-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35378683
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Krajnc, Nik $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
245    10
$a Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management / $c N. Krajnc, G. Bsteh, T. Berger, J. Mares, HP. Hartung
520    9_
$a Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.
650    _2
$a monoklonální protilátky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000911
650    12
$a protinádorové látky imunologicky aktivní $x terapeutické užití $7 D000074322
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a roztroušená skleróza $x terapie $7 D009103
650    _2
$a natalizumab $x terapeutické užití $7 D000069442
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a řízení rizik $7 D012308
650    _2
$a vakcinace $7 D014611
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Bsteh, Gabriel $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Berger, Thomas $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Mares, Jan $u Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hartung, Hans-Peter $u Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $u Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $u Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $u Brain and Mind Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. hans-peter.hartung@uni-duesseldorf.de $1 https://orcid.org/0000000206146989
773    0_
$w MED00167290 $t Neurotherapeutics $x 1878-7479 $g Roč. 19, č. 3 (2022), s. 753-773
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35378683 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100856 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854934 $s 1176757
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 19 $c 3 $d 753-773 $e 20220404 $i 1878-7479 $m Neurotherapeutics $n Neurotherapeutics $x MED00167290
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...