-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samples
M. Krutova, M. Brajerova, Z. Kepka, A. Briksi, P. Hubacek, P. Drevinek
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2014
Free Medical Journals
od 2007
PubMed Central
od 2007
ProQuest Central
od 2014-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2007-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2007-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2014-01-01
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
od 2007
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2007
PubMed
36065770
DOI
10.1111/irv.13048
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * diagnóza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 * genetika MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: The rapid diagnostics tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen vary in their sensitivities, and moreover, genomic mutations may further affect the performance of the assays. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of an automated antigen assay and compare its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant positive clinical samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analytical performance of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test was evaluated on a population of community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic investigated by the RT-qPCR AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were evaluated on prospective 621 nasopharyngeal swabs along with oropharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity regarding variants determined by the AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 Variant assays was analysed in additional, retrospective 158 Delta and 59 Omicron samples. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of the antigen test in prospective samples was 77.9% (113/145; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.3-84.4) with the specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 98.8-100). Regarding the variant, the sensitivity was higher in Omicron-variant samples, 93.2% (55/59; 95% CI 83.5-98.1), compared to Delta-variant samples, 71.5% (113/158; 95% CI 63.8-78.4; p = .001). CONCLUSION: In community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic, the automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test showed high sensitivity over 98.0% in subgroup samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 25. Regarding the variant, the antigen test sensitivity was higher in the Omicron-variant samples compared to the Delta-variant samples. The analytical performance of the antigen test can differ between the SARS-CoV-2 variants, and a re-evaluation should be performed for new circulating lineages.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22032857
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230131151428.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/irv.13048 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36065770
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Krutova, Marcela $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000245119430
- 245 14
- $a The evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samples / $c M. Krutova, M. Brajerova, Z. Kepka, A. Briksi, P. Hubacek, P. Drevinek
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The rapid diagnostics tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen vary in their sensitivities, and moreover, genomic mutations may further affect the performance of the assays. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of an automated antigen assay and compare its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant positive clinical samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analytical performance of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test was evaluated on a population of community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic investigated by the RT-qPCR AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were evaluated on prospective 621 nasopharyngeal swabs along with oropharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity regarding variants determined by the AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 Variant assays was analysed in additional, retrospective 158 Delta and 59 Omicron samples. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of the antigen test in prospective samples was 77.9% (113/145; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.3-84.4) with the specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 98.8-100). Regarding the variant, the sensitivity was higher in Omicron-variant samples, 93.2% (55/59; 95% CI 83.5-98.1), compared to Delta-variant samples, 71.5% (113/158; 95% CI 63.8-78.4; p = .001). CONCLUSION: In community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic, the automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test showed high sensitivity over 98.0% in subgroup samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 25. Regarding the variant, the antigen test sensitivity was higher in the Omicron-variant samples compared to the Delta-variant samples. The analytical performance of the antigen test can differ between the SARS-CoV-2 variants, and a re-evaluation should be performed for new circulating lineages.
- 650 12
- $a COVID-19 $x diagnóza $7 D000086382
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a SARS-CoV-2 $x genetika $7 D000086402
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Brajerova, Marie $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kepka, Zdenek $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Briksi, Ales $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hubacek, Petr $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Drevinek, Pavel $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00157838 $t Influenza and other respiratory viruses $x 1750-2659 $g Roč. 16, č. 6 (2022), s. 1033-1039
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36065770 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230131151424 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891541 $s 1184192
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 16 $c 6 $d 1033-1039 $e 20220906 $i 1750-2659 $m Influenza and other respiratory viruses $n Influenza Other Respir Viruses $x MED00157838
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120