• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samples

M. Krutova, M. Brajerova, Z. Kepka, A. Briksi, P. Hubacek, P. Drevinek

. 2022 ; 16 (6) : 1033-1039. [pub] 20220906

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22032857

BACKGROUND: The rapid diagnostics tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen vary in their sensitivities, and moreover, genomic mutations may further affect the performance of the assays. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of an automated antigen assay and compare its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant positive clinical samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analytical performance of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test was evaluated on a population of community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic investigated by the RT-qPCR AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were evaluated on prospective 621 nasopharyngeal swabs along with oropharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity regarding variants determined by the AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 Variant assays was analysed in additional, retrospective 158 Delta and 59 Omicron samples. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of the antigen test in prospective samples was 77.9% (113/145; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.3-84.4) with the specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 98.8-100). Regarding the variant, the sensitivity was higher in Omicron-variant samples, 93.2% (55/59; 95% CI 83.5-98.1), compared to Delta-variant samples, 71.5% (113/158; 95% CI 63.8-78.4; p = .001). CONCLUSION: In community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic, the automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test showed high sensitivity over 98.0% in subgroup samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 25. Regarding the variant, the antigen test sensitivity was higher in the Omicron-variant samples compared to the Delta-variant samples. The analytical performance of the antigen test can differ between the SARS-CoV-2 variants, and a re-evaluation should be performed for new circulating lineages.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22032857
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131151428.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/irv.13048 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36065770
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Krutova, Marcela $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000245119430
245    14
$a The evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samples / $c M. Krutova, M. Brajerova, Z. Kepka, A. Briksi, P. Hubacek, P. Drevinek
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The rapid diagnostics tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen vary in their sensitivities, and moreover, genomic mutations may further affect the performance of the assays. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of an automated antigen assay and compare its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant positive clinical samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analytical performance of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test was evaluated on a population of community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic investigated by the RT-qPCR AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were evaluated on prospective 621 nasopharyngeal swabs along with oropharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity regarding variants determined by the AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 Variant assays was analysed in additional, retrospective 158 Delta and 59 Omicron samples. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of the antigen test in prospective samples was 77.9% (113/145; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.3-84.4) with the specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 98.8-100). Regarding the variant, the sensitivity was higher in Omicron-variant samples, 93.2% (55/59; 95% CI 83.5-98.1), compared to Delta-variant samples, 71.5% (113/158; 95% CI 63.8-78.4; p = .001). CONCLUSION: In community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic, the automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test showed high sensitivity over 98.0% in subgroup samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values &lt; 25. Regarding the variant, the antigen test sensitivity was higher in the Omicron-variant samples compared to the Delta-variant samples. The analytical performance of the antigen test can differ between the SARS-CoV-2 variants, and a re-evaluation should be performed for new circulating lineages.
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x diagnóza $7 D000086382
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a SARS-CoV-2 $x genetika $7 D000086402
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Brajerova, Marie $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kepka, Zdenek $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Briksi, Ales $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hubacek, Petr $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Drevinek, Pavel $u Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00157838 $t Influenza and other respiratory viruses $x 1750-2659 $g Roč. 16, č. 6 (2022), s. 1033-1039
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36065770 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131151424 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891541 $s 1184192
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 16 $c 6 $d 1033-1039 $e 20220906 $i 1750-2659 $m Influenza and other respiratory viruses $n Influenza Other Respir Viruses $x MED00157838
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...