-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Item response theory and differential test functioning analysis of the HBSC-Symptom-Checklist across 46 countries
A. Heinz, PE. Sischka, C. Catunda, A. Cosma, I. García-Moya, N. Lyyra, A. Kaman, U. Ravens-Sieberer, W. Pickett
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- emoce MeSH
- kontrolní seznam * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- školy * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: The Symptom Checklist (SCL) developed by the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study is a non-clinical measure of psychosomatic complaints (e.g., headache and feeling low) that has been used in numerous studies. Several studies have investigated the psychometric characteristics of this scale; however, some psychometric properties remain unclear, among them especially a) dimensionality, b) adequacy of the Graded Response Model (GRM), and c) measurement invariance across countries. METHODS: Data from 229,906 adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 from 46 countries that participated in the 2018 HBSC survey were analyzed. Adolescents were selected using representative sampling and surveyed by questionnaire in the classroom. Dimensionality was investigated using exploratory graph analysis. In addition, we investigated whether the GRM provided an adequate description of the data. Reliability over the latent variable continuum and differential test functioning across countries were also examined. RESULTS: Exploratory graph analyses showed that SCL can be considered as one-dimensional in 16 countries. However, a comparison of the unidimensional with a post-hoc bifactor GRM showed that deviation from a hypothesized one-dimensional structure was negligible in most countries. Multigroup invariance analyses supported configural and metric invariance, but not scalar invariance across 32 countries. Alignment analysis showed non-invariance especially for the items irritability, feeling nervous/bad temper and feeling low. CONCLUSION: HBSC-SCL appears to represent a consistent and reliable unidimensional instrument across most countries. This bodes well for population health analyses that rely on this scale as an early indicator of mental health status.
Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
Department of Health IU Internationale Hochschule Erfurt Germany
Department of Health Sciences Brock University St Catharines Canada
Department of Public Health Sciences Queen's University Kingston Canada
Department of Sociology Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22033255
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230131150931.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12874-022-01698-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36175865
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Heinz, Andreas $u Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Maison des Sciences Humaines, 11, Porte des Sciences, L-4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg. andreas.heinz@uni.lu $u Department of Health, IU Internationale Hochschule, Erfurt, Germany. andreas.heinz@uni.lu $1 https://orcid.org/000000022362417X
- 245 10
- $a Item response theory and differential test functioning analysis of the HBSC-Symptom-Checklist across 46 countries / $c A. Heinz, PE. Sischka, C. Catunda, A. Cosma, I. García-Moya, N. Lyyra, A. Kaman, U. Ravens-Sieberer, W. Pickett
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The Symptom Checklist (SCL) developed by the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study is a non-clinical measure of psychosomatic complaints (e.g., headache and feeling low) that has been used in numerous studies. Several studies have investigated the psychometric characteristics of this scale; however, some psychometric properties remain unclear, among them especially a) dimensionality, b) adequacy of the Graded Response Model (GRM), and c) measurement invariance across countries. METHODS: Data from 229,906 adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 from 46 countries that participated in the 2018 HBSC survey were analyzed. Adolescents were selected using representative sampling and surveyed by questionnaire in the classroom. Dimensionality was investigated using exploratory graph analysis. In addition, we investigated whether the GRM provided an adequate description of the data. Reliability over the latent variable continuum and differential test functioning across countries were also examined. RESULTS: Exploratory graph analyses showed that SCL can be considered as one-dimensional in 16 countries. However, a comparison of the unidimensional with a post-hoc bifactor GRM showed that deviation from a hypothesized one-dimensional structure was negligible in most countries. Multigroup invariance analyses supported configural and metric invariance, but not scalar invariance across 32 countries. Alignment analysis showed non-invariance especially for the items irritability, feeling nervous/bad temper and feeling low. CONCLUSION: HBSC-SCL appears to represent a consistent and reliable unidimensional instrument across most countries. This bodes well for population health analyses that rely on this scale as an early indicator of mental health status.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 12
- $a kontrolní seznam $7 D057189
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a emoce $7 D004644
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $7 D011594
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 12
- $a školy $7 D012574
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Sischka, Philipp E $u Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg $1 https://orcid.org/0000000184140817
- 700 1_
- $a Catunda, Carolina $u Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Maison des Sciences Humaines, 11, Porte des Sciences, L-4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- 700 1_
- $a Cosma, Alina $u Sts Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology, Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Department of Sociology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000206035226
- 700 1_
- $a García-Moya, Irene $u Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/000000025377315X
- 700 1_
- $a Lyyra, Nelli $u Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000161383605
- 700 1_
- $a Kaman, Anne $u Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000174986229
- 700 1_
- $a Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike $u Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/000000022031095X
- 700 1_
- $a Pickett, William $u Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, Canada $u Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006775 $t BMC medical research methodology $x 1471-2288 $g Roč. 22, č. 1 (2022), s. 253
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36175865 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230131150927 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891812 $s 1184590
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 22 $c 1 $d 253 $e 20220929 $i 1471-2288 $m Bmc medical research methodology $n BMC Med Res Methodol $x MED00006775
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120