-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Immunogenicity and Safety of the Spikevax® (Moderna) mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Patients with Primary Humoral Immunodeficiency
P. Kralickova, K. Jankovicova, I. Sejkorova, O. Soucek, K. Koprivova, M. Drahosova, C. Andrys, J. Krejsek
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36202084
DOI
10.1159/000526375
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- běžná variabilní imunodeficience * terapie MeSH
- COVID-19 * prevence a kontrola MeSH
- imunoglobulin A MeSH
- imunoglobulin G MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- messenger RNA MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- syndromy imunologické nedostatečnosti * MeSH
- vakcinace MeSH
- vakcíny proti COVID-19 * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Reports on the immunogenicity and efficacy of the Spikevax® vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in immunodeficient patients are still scarce. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency. METHODS: We enrolled 46 patients, including 34 patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), 10 patients with unclassified hypogammaglobulinemia (HypoIg), and 2 patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia. We collected the blood samples before vaccination (D 0), and 10 days (D +38) and 90 days (D +118) after the second vaccination. Further, we quantified SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response (QuantiFERON ELISA test), serum anti-RBD IgG, and anti-RBD IgA-specific antibodies (enzyme immunoassay). RESULTS: We found that the vaccination elicited predominantly mild adverse events, comparable to healthy population. Vaccination response negatively correlated with a value of Immune Deficiency and Dysregulation Activity in all measured parameters. D +38, seroconversion for anti-RBD IgG and anti-RBD IgA was observed in 65% and 21% CVID patients, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response was detected in less than 50% of CVID patients. Meanwhile, HypoIg patients had 100%, 90%, and 60% positivity rates for anti-RBD IgG, anti-RBD IgA, and T-cell response, respectively. Three months after the second vaccination, 82% of the responders remained positive for anti-RBD IgG, but only less than 50% remained positive for T-cell activity in CVIDs. Low immunogenicity was observed in patients with lung involvement and/or rituximab treatment history. No SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported within 6 months after the second vaccination. CONCLUSION: Spikevax® seems to be safe with satisfactory immunogenicity in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22033375
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230131150802.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1159/000526375 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36202084
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Kralickova, Pavlina $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Immunogenicity and Safety of the Spikevax® (Moderna) mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Patients with Primary Humoral Immunodeficiency / $c P. Kralickova, K. Jankovicova, I. Sejkorova, O. Soucek, K. Koprivova, M. Drahosova, C. Andrys, J. Krejsek
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Reports on the immunogenicity and efficacy of the Spikevax® vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in immunodeficient patients are still scarce. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency. METHODS: We enrolled 46 patients, including 34 patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), 10 patients with unclassified hypogammaglobulinemia (HypoIg), and 2 patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia. We collected the blood samples before vaccination (D 0), and 10 days (D +38) and 90 days (D +118) after the second vaccination. Further, we quantified SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response (QuantiFERON ELISA test), serum anti-RBD IgG, and anti-RBD IgA-specific antibodies (enzyme immunoassay). RESULTS: We found that the vaccination elicited predominantly mild adverse events, comparable to healthy population. Vaccination response negatively correlated with a value of Immune Deficiency and Dysregulation Activity in all measured parameters. D +38, seroconversion for anti-RBD IgG and anti-RBD IgA was observed in 65% and 21% CVID patients, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response was detected in less than 50% of CVID patients. Meanwhile, HypoIg patients had 100%, 90%, and 60% positivity rates for anti-RBD IgG, anti-RBD IgA, and T-cell response, respectively. Three months after the second vaccination, 82% of the responders remained positive for anti-RBD IgG, but only less than 50% remained positive for T-cell activity in CVIDs. Low immunogenicity was observed in patients with lung involvement and/or rituximab treatment history. No SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported within 6 months after the second vaccination. CONCLUSION: Spikevax® seems to be safe with satisfactory immunogenicity in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a běžná variabilní imunodeficience $x terapie $7 D017074
- 650 12
- $a COVID-19 $x prevence a kontrola $7 D000086382
- 650 12
- $a vakcíny proti COVID-19 $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000086663
- 650 _2
- $a imunoglobulin A $7 D007070
- 650 _2
- $a imunoglobulin G $7 D007074
- 650 12
- $a syndromy imunologické nedostatečnosti $7 D007153
- 650 _2
- $a messenger RNA $7 D012333
- 650 _2
- $a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
- 650 _2
- $a vakcinace $7 D014611
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Jankovicova, Karolina $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Sejkorova, Ilona $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Soucek, Ondrej $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Koprivova, Katerina $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Drahosova, Marcela $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Andrys, Ctirad $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Krejsek, Jan $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002269 $t International archives of allergy and immunology $x 1423-0097 $g Roč. 183, č. 12 (2022), s. 1297-1310
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36202084 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230131150758 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891903 $s 1184710
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 183 $c 12 $d 1297-1310 $e 20221006 $i 1423-0097 $m International archives of allergy and immunology $n Int Arch Allergy Immunol $x MED00002269
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120