Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Immunogenicity and Safety of the Spikevax® (Moderna) mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Patients with Primary Humoral Immunodeficiency

P. Kralickova, K. Jankovicova, I. Sejkorova, O. Soucek, K. Koprivova, M. Drahosova, C. Andrys, J. Krejsek

. 2022 ; 183 (12) : 1297-1310. [pub] 20221006

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22033375

INTRODUCTION: Reports on the immunogenicity and efficacy of the Spikevax® vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in immunodeficient patients are still scarce. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency. METHODS: We enrolled 46 patients, including 34 patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), 10 patients with unclassified hypogammaglobulinemia (HypoIg), and 2 patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia. We collected the blood samples before vaccination (D 0), and 10 days (D +38) and 90 days (D +118) after the second vaccination. Further, we quantified SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response (QuantiFERON ELISA test), serum anti-RBD IgG, and anti-RBD IgA-specific antibodies (enzyme immunoassay). RESULTS: We found that the vaccination elicited predominantly mild adverse events, comparable to healthy population. Vaccination response negatively correlated with a value of Immune Deficiency and Dysregulation Activity in all measured parameters. D +38, seroconversion for anti-RBD IgG and anti-RBD IgA was observed in 65% and 21% CVID patients, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response was detected in less than 50% of CVID patients. Meanwhile, HypoIg patients had 100%, 90%, and 60% positivity rates for anti-RBD IgG, anti-RBD IgA, and T-cell response, respectively. Three months after the second vaccination, 82% of the responders remained positive for anti-RBD IgG, but only less than 50% remained positive for T-cell activity in CVIDs. Low immunogenicity was observed in patients with lung involvement and/or rituximab treatment history. No SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported within 6 months after the second vaccination. CONCLUSION: Spikevax® seems to be safe with satisfactory immunogenicity in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22033375
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131150802.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1159/000526375 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36202084
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Kralickova, Pavlina $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
245    10
$a Immunogenicity and Safety of the Spikevax® (Moderna) mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Patients with Primary Humoral Immunodeficiency / $c P. Kralickova, K. Jankovicova, I. Sejkorova, O. Soucek, K. Koprivova, M. Drahosova, C. Andrys, J. Krejsek
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Reports on the immunogenicity and efficacy of the Spikevax® vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in immunodeficient patients are still scarce. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency. METHODS: We enrolled 46 patients, including 34 patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), 10 patients with unclassified hypogammaglobulinemia (HypoIg), and 2 patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia. We collected the blood samples before vaccination (D 0), and 10 days (D +38) and 90 days (D +118) after the second vaccination. Further, we quantified SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response (QuantiFERON ELISA test), serum anti-RBD IgG, and anti-RBD IgA-specific antibodies (enzyme immunoassay). RESULTS: We found that the vaccination elicited predominantly mild adverse events, comparable to healthy population. Vaccination response negatively correlated with a value of Immune Deficiency and Dysregulation Activity in all measured parameters. D +38, seroconversion for anti-RBD IgG and anti-RBD IgA was observed in 65% and 21% CVID patients, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response was detected in less than 50% of CVID patients. Meanwhile, HypoIg patients had 100%, 90%, and 60% positivity rates for anti-RBD IgG, anti-RBD IgA, and T-cell response, respectively. Three months after the second vaccination, 82% of the responders remained positive for anti-RBD IgG, but only less than 50% remained positive for T-cell activity in CVIDs. Low immunogenicity was observed in patients with lung involvement and/or rituximab treatment history. No SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported within 6 months after the second vaccination. CONCLUSION: Spikevax® seems to be safe with satisfactory immunogenicity in patients with primary humoral immunodeficiency.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a běžná variabilní imunodeficience $x terapie $7 D017074
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x prevence a kontrola $7 D000086382
650    12
$a vakcíny proti COVID-19 $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000086663
650    _2
$a imunoglobulin A $7 D007070
650    _2
$a imunoglobulin G $7 D007074
650    12
$a syndromy imunologické nedostatečnosti $7 D007153
650    _2
$a messenger RNA $7 D012333
650    _2
$a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
650    _2
$a vakcinace $7 D014611
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jankovicova, Karolina $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia
700    1_
$a Sejkorova, Ilona $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
700    1_
$a Soucek, Ondrej $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
700    1_
$a Koprivova, Katerina $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia
700    1_
$a Drahosova, Marcela $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia
700    1_
$a Andrys, Ctirad $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
700    1_
$a Krejsek, Jan $u Institute of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00002269 $t International archives of allergy and immunology $x 1423-0097 $g Roč. 183, č. 12 (2022), s. 1297-1310
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36202084 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131150758 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891903 $s 1184710
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 183 $c 12 $d 1297-1310 $e 20221006 $i 1423-0097 $m International archives of allergy and immunology $n Int Arch Allergy Immunol $x MED00002269
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...