-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Postpartum symphysiolysis - case study series - analysis of literature and out experience
Vojtěch Herrmann, Martin Křivohlávek, Jaroslav Šrám
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu kazuistiky, přehledy
- MeSH
- chirurgické operační výkony metody MeSH
- diagnostické techniky porodnicko-gynekologické trendy MeSH
- diastáza symphysis pubica * chirurgie diagnóza terapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- komplikace porodu chirurgie diagnóza patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pánev chirurgie zranění MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- kazuistiky MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
In the presented case studies, the author summarizes his own experience with postpartum symphysiolysis. Based on this experience and a thorough analysis of the literature, the author subsequently outlines the possibilities of its diagnosis and treatment. Postpartum symphysiolysis is a rare injury that is only minimally mentioned in the literature. It is a multifactorial disease and due to the fact that it stands at the border of gynaecology, orthopaedics and traumatology, or anaesthesiology, it lacks clear and uniform recommendations in its diagnosis and treatment. In the last two decades, the number of published cases has increased significantly. This phenomenon may also be due to the fact that historically pelvic pain during pregnancy and childbirth was considered natural and not given much importance. Moreover, mild forms of diastasis often escape attention. The basic problem is the lack of systematic diagnostics on which subsequent recommendations can be based. An ultrasound examination of the pubic symphysis is a suitable method for diagnosis, ideally included in prenatal screening. The treatment is determined depending on the size of the symphyseal separation and the clinical difficulties of the patient. In mild forms, conservative therapy is the method of choice. In more severe forms, where both anterior and posterior pelvic injuries are combined, the choice of therapy remains controversial. One of the methods suitable for deciding on the therapeutic approach is skiascopic examination with pelvic residual stability test. If we proceed to the surgical solution, it turns out that all available methods show good results, whether it is external fixation, minimally invasive percutaneous fixation or open plate osteosynthesis.
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23000318
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231017201158.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230222s2021 xr a f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Herrmann, Vojtěch $7 xx0277980 $u Centre of Traumatology & Orthopaedics, regional Hospital Liberec a.s.
- 245 10
- $a Postpartum symphysiolysis - case study series - analysis of literature and out experience / $c Vojtěch Herrmann, Martin Křivohlávek, Jaroslav Šrám
- 520 9_
- $a In the presented case studies, the author summarizes his own experience with postpartum symphysiolysis. Based on this experience and a thorough analysis of the literature, the author subsequently outlines the possibilities of its diagnosis and treatment. Postpartum symphysiolysis is a rare injury that is only minimally mentioned in the literature. It is a multifactorial disease and due to the fact that it stands at the border of gynaecology, orthopaedics and traumatology, or anaesthesiology, it lacks clear and uniform recommendations in its diagnosis and treatment. In the last two decades, the number of published cases has increased significantly. This phenomenon may also be due to the fact that historically pelvic pain during pregnancy and childbirth was considered natural and not given much importance. Moreover, mild forms of diastasis often escape attention. The basic problem is the lack of systematic diagnostics on which subsequent recommendations can be based. An ultrasound examination of the pubic symphysis is a suitable method for diagnosis, ideally included in prenatal screening. The treatment is determined depending on the size of the symphyseal separation and the clinical difficulties of the patient. In mild forms, conservative therapy is the method of choice. In more severe forms, where both anterior and posterior pelvic injuries are combined, the choice of therapy remains controversial. One of the methods suitable for deciding on the therapeutic approach is skiascopic examination with pelvic residual stability test. If we proceed to the surgical solution, it turns out that all available methods show good results, whether it is external fixation, minimally invasive percutaneous fixation or open plate osteosynthesis.
- 650 17
- $a diastáza symphysis pubica $x chirurgie $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D046548 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a komplikace porodu $x chirurgie $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D007744 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a pánev $x chirurgie $x zranění $7 D010388 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a diagnostické techniky porodnicko-gynekologické $x trendy $7 D003944 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a chirurgické operační výkony $x metody $7 D013514 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a dospělí $7 D000328 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a lidé $7 D006801 $2 czmesh
- 655 _7
- $a kazuistiky $7 D002363 $2 czmesh
- 655 _7
- $a přehledy $7 D016454 $2 czmesh
- 700 1_
- $a Křivohlávek, Martin $7 xx0081916 $u Centre of Traumatology & Orthopaedics, regional Hospital Liberec a.s.
- 700 1_
- $a Šrám, Jaroslav $7 xx0081917 $u Centre of Traumatology & Orthopaedics, regional Hospital Liberec a.s.
- 773 0_
- $t Úrazová chirurgie $x 1211-7080 $g Roč. 28, č. 1 (2021), s. 33-37 $w MED00011238
- 856 41
- $u https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/urazova-chirurgie/2021-1-34/poporodni-symfyzeolyza-serie-kazuistik-analyza-literatury-a-nase-zkusenosti-133036?hl=en $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1869 $c 471 a $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230222131943 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231017201155 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1901042 $s 1186502
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 28 $c 1 $d 33-37 $i 1211-7080 $m Úrazová chirurgie $x MED00011238
- LZP __
- $c NLK194 $d 20231017 $a NLK 2023-07/dk