-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth's Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-product
R. Hübner, DMG. Lewis, L. Al-Shawaf, AY. Semchenko, J. Flores
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2011
Free Medical Journals
from 2011
Nature Open Access
from 2011-12-01
PubMed Central
from 2011
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011
ProQuest Central
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2011
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2011-12-01
- MeSH
- Biological Evolution MeSH
- Exercise MeSH
- Esthetics MeSH
- Beauty * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Art * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
In 1753, artist William Hogarth declared a specific S-shaped line to be the 'Line of Beauty' (LoB). Hogarth's assertion has had a profound impact on diverse fields over the past two and a half centuries. However, only one recent (2022) study has investigated whether Hogarth's assertion accurately captures humans' actual aesthetic preferences, and no research has explored why people find the LoB beautiful. We conducted two studies testing the hypothesis that the LoB's perceived beauty is an incidental by-product of cognitive systems that evolved to attend to fitness-relevant morphological features in people. In Study 1, we replicated the finding that female bodies whose lumbar curvature approximates the biomechanical optimum for dealing with the exigencies of pregnancy are rated as more attractive. In Study 2, we found that abstract lines extracted from these bodies were perceived as more beautiful than other lines. These results suggest that the preference for Hogarth's LoB is an incidental by-product of psychological mechanisms that evolved for other purposes. More broadly, these findings suggest that an evolutionary psychological approach - in particular the concept of evolutionary by-product - may be useful for understanding, explaining, and predicting people's aesthetic preferences for certain abstract symbols, which otherwise might seem arbitrary and inexplicable.
Centre for Healthy Ageing Health Futures Institute Murdoch University Murdoch Australia
Department of Psychology University of Konstanz D 78457 Konstanz Germany
Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Houston Christian University Houston USA
Psychology Department University of Colorado Colorado Springs Colorado Springs USA
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23003828
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425140915.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41598-023-31175-w $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36914706
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Hübner, Ronald $u Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, D-78457, Konstanz, Germany. ronald.huebner@uni-konstanz.de $1 https://orcid.org/0000000227886214
- 245 10
- $a Evidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth's Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-product / $c R. Hübner, DMG. Lewis, L. Al-Shawaf, AY. Semchenko, J. Flores
- 520 9_
- $a In 1753, artist William Hogarth declared a specific S-shaped line to be the 'Line of Beauty' (LoB). Hogarth's assertion has had a profound impact on diverse fields over the past two and a half centuries. However, only one recent (2022) study has investigated whether Hogarth's assertion accurately captures humans' actual aesthetic preferences, and no research has explored why people find the LoB beautiful. We conducted two studies testing the hypothesis that the LoB's perceived beauty is an incidental by-product of cognitive systems that evolved to attend to fitness-relevant morphological features in people. In Study 1, we replicated the finding that female bodies whose lumbar curvature approximates the biomechanical optimum for dealing with the exigencies of pregnancy are rated as more attractive. In Study 2, we found that abstract lines extracted from these bodies were perceived as more beautiful than other lines. These results suggest that the preference for Hogarth's LoB is an incidental by-product of psychological mechanisms that evolved for other purposes. More broadly, these findings suggest that an evolutionary psychological approach - in particular the concept of evolutionary by-product - may be useful for understanding, explaining, and predicting people's aesthetic preferences for certain abstract symbols, which otherwise might seem arbitrary and inexplicable.
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a krása $7 D001504
- 650 _2
- $a estetika $7 D004954
- 650 12
- $a umění $7 D001154
- 650 _2
- $a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
- 650 _2
- $a cvičení $7 D015444
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Lewis, David M G $u School of Psychology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia $u Centre for Healthy Ageing, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000282675727
- 700 1_
- $a Al-Shawaf, Laith $u Psychology Department, University of Colorado-Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000286000591
- 700 1_
- $a Semchenko, Ayten Yesim $u Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000331000268
- 700 1_
- $a Flores, Jonathon $u Houston Christian University, Houston, USA
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 13, č. 1 (2023), s. 4134
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36914706 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425140912 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1924477 $s 1190037
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 13 $c 1 $d 4134 $e 20230313 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418