-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Accuracy of substance exposure history in patients attending emergency departments after substance misuse; a comparison with biological sample analysis
I. Virmani, A. Oteo, M. Dunn, D. Vidler, C. Roper, J. Officer, G. Hardy, PI. Dargan, M. Eddleston, JG. Cooper, SL. Hill, R. Macfarlane, L. Keating, M. Haden, S. Hudson, SHL. Thomas
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- agonisté kanabinoidních receptorů MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hmotnostní spektrometrie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- odhalování abúzu drog metody MeSH
- poruchy spojené s užíváním psychoaktivních látek * diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- urgentní služby nemocnice MeSH
- zakázané drogy * toxicita MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
CONTEXT: Acute toxicity caused by illicit substance use is a common reason for emergency department (ED) presentation. Knowledge of the substances involved is helpful for predicting and managing potential toxicity, but limited information is available about the accuracy of patient-reported substance exposure. This study assessed the accuracy of the history of exposure in those reporting use of a single substance by comparison with those identified by detailed toxicological analysis, focusing on synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRA). METHODS: Adults (≥16 years) presenting between March 2015 and July 2021 to participating UK hospitals with toxicity after reporting use of a single illicit substance were included. Exposure details were documented from medical records and blood and/or urine samples analysed using high-resolution accurate mass liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HRAM LCMS). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the exposure history were calculated by comparison with biological sample analysis ("gold standard"). RESULTS: Single substance exposure was reported for 474 (median age 33 years, IQR: 18 range 16-75, 80% males) patients. Analysis commonly identified multiple substances (Median 3, IQR 2-5). A history of exposure was documented for 121 of 151 patients where a SCRA or metabolite was detected on analysis (sensitivity 80.1%, 95% CI 72.9, 86.2%). Corresponding proportions were lower for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 44/70, 62.9%., 95% CI 50.5%, 74.1%), heroin 41/108 (38.0% 95% CI 28.8-47.8%) and cocaine (22/56, 31.3%, 95% CI 20.9, 43.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple undeclared substances were detected analytically in most patients reporting single substance use. Clinicians should be alert to the potential presence and toxicity of unreported substances when managing patients presenting after substance misuse.
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Aberdeen UK
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Blackpool UK
Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust Epsom UK
LGC Sport and Specialised Analytical Services Fordham UK
Medical Toxicology Centre Newcastle University Newcastle UK
Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and National Poisons Information Service Newcastle UK
Pharmacology Toxicology and Therapeutics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
RECETOX Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust Reading UK
Scottish Police Authority Forensic Services Edinburgh UK
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23004794
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425171725.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/15563650.2022.2131566 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36322622
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Virmani, Ishita $u Medical Toxicology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK $u RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000024773164X
- 245 10
- $a Accuracy of substance exposure history in patients attending emergency departments after substance misuse; a comparison with biological sample analysis / $c I. Virmani, A. Oteo, M. Dunn, D. Vidler, C. Roper, J. Officer, G. Hardy, PI. Dargan, M. Eddleston, JG. Cooper, SL. Hill, R. Macfarlane, L. Keating, M. Haden, S. Hudson, SHL. Thomas
- 520 9_
- $a CONTEXT: Acute toxicity caused by illicit substance use is a common reason for emergency department (ED) presentation. Knowledge of the substances involved is helpful for predicting and managing potential toxicity, but limited information is available about the accuracy of patient-reported substance exposure. This study assessed the accuracy of the history of exposure in those reporting use of a single substance by comparison with those identified by detailed toxicological analysis, focusing on synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRA). METHODS: Adults (≥16 years) presenting between March 2015 and July 2021 to participating UK hospitals with toxicity after reporting use of a single illicit substance were included. Exposure details were documented from medical records and blood and/or urine samples analysed using high-resolution accurate mass liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HRAM LCMS). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the exposure history were calculated by comparison with biological sample analysis ("gold standard"). RESULTS: Single substance exposure was reported for 474 (median age 33 years, IQR: 18 range 16-75, 80% males) patients. Analysis commonly identified multiple substances (Median 3, IQR 2-5). A history of exposure was documented for 121 of 151 patients where a SCRA or metabolite was detected on analysis (sensitivity 80.1%, 95% CI 72.9, 86.2%). Corresponding proportions were lower for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 44/70, 62.9%., 95% CI 50.5%, 74.1%), heroin 41/108 (38.0% 95% CI 28.8-47.8%) and cocaine (22/56, 31.3%, 95% CI 20.9, 43.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple undeclared substances were detected analytically in most patients reporting single substance use. Clinicians should be alert to the potential presence and toxicity of unreported substances when managing patients presenting after substance misuse.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a zakázané drogy $x toxicita $7 D013287
- 650 12
- $a poruchy spojené s užíváním psychoaktivních látek $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D019966
- 650 _2
- $a agonisté kanabinoidních receptorů $7 D063386
- 650 _2
- $a hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D013058
- 650 _2
- $a urgentní služby nemocnice $7 D004636
- 650 _2
- $a odhalování abúzu drog $x metody $7 D015813
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Oteo, Alberto $u Addictions and Inclusion Directorate, Department of Health and Social Care, Office for Health Improvement & Disparities, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000242399529
- 700 1_
- $a Dunn, Michael $u Medical Toxicology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Vidler, Daniel $u Medical Toxicology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Roper, Clair $u Medical Toxicology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Officer, Jane $u Scottish Police Authority Forensic Services, Edinburgh, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Hardy, Gareth $u Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Dargan, Paul I $u Clinical Toxicology, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London and Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Eddleston, Michael $u Pharmacology, Toxicology & Therapeutics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000268573441
- 700 1_
- $a Cooper, Jamie G $u Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000338127026
- 700 1_
- $a Hill, Simon L $u Medical Toxicology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK $u Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and National Poisons Information Service, Newcastle, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Macfarlane, Rebecca $u Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000311214808
- 700 1_
- $a Keating, Liza $u Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000190282520
- 700 1_
- $a Haden, Mark $u St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000211988822
- 700 1_
- $a Hudson, Simon $u LGC Sport and Specialised Analytical Services, Fordham, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Thomas, Simon H L $u Medical Toxicology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK $u Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and National Poisons Information Service, Newcastle, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000205816389
- 773 0_
- $w MED00013938 $t Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) $x 1556-9519 $g Roč. 61, č. 1 (2023), s. 39-46
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36322622 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425171721 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1925091 $s 1191003
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 61 $c 1 $d 39-46 $e 20221102 $i 1556-9519 $m Clinical toxicology $n Clin Toxicol (Phila) $x MED00013938
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418