• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022

RM. Geraghty, NF. Davis, L. Tzelves, R. Lombardo, C. Yuan, K. Thomas, A. Petrik, A. Neisius, C. Türk, G. Gambaro, A. Skolarikos, BK. Somani

. 2023 ; 9 (1) : 199-208. [pub] 20220801

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu přehledy, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23004827

PURPOSE: The European Association of Urology (EAU) has updated its guidelines on clinical best practice in urolithiasis for 2021. We therefore aimed to present a summary of best clinical practice in surgical intervention for patients with upper tract urolithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel performed a comprehensive literature review of novel data up to May 2021. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating was given for each recommendation, graded using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. RESULTS: The choice of surgical intervention depends on stone characteristics, patient anatomy, comorbidities, and choice. For shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), the optimal shock frequency is 1.0-1.5 Hz. For ureteroscopy (URS), a postoperative stent is not needed in uncomplicated cases. Flexible URS is an alternative if percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or SWL is contraindicated, even for stones >2 cm. For PCNL, prone and supine approaches are equally safe. For uncomplicated PCNL cases, a nephrostomy tube after PCNL is not necessary. Radiation exposure for endourological procedures should follow the as low as reasonably achievable principles. CONCLUSIONS: This is a summary of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines on best clinical practice in interventional management of urolithiasis. The full guideline is available at https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology has produced guidelines on the best management of kidney stones, which are summarised in this paper. Kidney stone disease is a common condition; computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to diagnose it. The guidelines aim to decrease radiation exposure to patients by minimising the use of x-rays and CT scans. We detail specific advice around the common operations for kidney stones.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23004827
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230425171737.0
007      
ta
008      
230418s2023 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35927160
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Geraghty, Robert M $u Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK; Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
245    10
$a Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022 / $c RM. Geraghty, NF. Davis, L. Tzelves, R. Lombardo, C. Yuan, K. Thomas, A. Petrik, A. Neisius, C. Türk, G. Gambaro, A. Skolarikos, BK. Somani
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The European Association of Urology (EAU) has updated its guidelines on clinical best practice in urolithiasis for 2021. We therefore aimed to present a summary of best clinical practice in surgical intervention for patients with upper tract urolithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel performed a comprehensive literature review of novel data up to May 2021. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating was given for each recommendation, graded using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. RESULTS: The choice of surgical intervention depends on stone characteristics, patient anatomy, comorbidities, and choice. For shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), the optimal shock frequency is 1.0-1.5 Hz. For ureteroscopy (URS), a postoperative stent is not needed in uncomplicated cases. Flexible URS is an alternative if percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or SWL is contraindicated, even for stones >2 cm. For PCNL, prone and supine approaches are equally safe. For uncomplicated PCNL cases, a nephrostomy tube after PCNL is not necessary. Radiation exposure for endourological procedures should follow the as low as reasonably achievable principles. CONCLUSIONS: This is a summary of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines on best clinical practice in interventional management of urolithiasis. The full guideline is available at https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology has produced guidelines on the best management of kidney stones, which are summarised in this paper. Kidney stone disease is a common condition; computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to diagnose it. The guidelines aim to decrease radiation exposure to patients by minimising the use of x-rays and CT scans. We detail specific advice around the common operations for kidney stones.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a urologie $7 D014572
650    12
$a urolitiáza $x chirurgie $x komplikace $7 D052878
650    12
$a ledvinové kameny $x chirurgie $x komplikace $7 D007669
650    _2
$a ureteroskopie $x metody $7 D018666
650    12
$a perkutánní nefrostomie $x metody $7 D009403
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
655    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi $7 D017065
700    1_
$a Davis, Niall F $u Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Co Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
700    1_
$a Tzelves, Lazaros $u Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
700    1_
$a Lombardo, Riccardo $u Sant 'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Yuan, Cathy $u Division of Gastroenterology & Cochrane UGPD Group, Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
700    1_
$a Thomas, Kay $u Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
700    1_
$a Petrik, Ales $u Department of Urology, Region Hospital, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Neisius, Andreas $u Department of Urology, Bruederkrankenhaus Trier, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Trier, Germany
700    1_
$a Türk, Christian $u Department of Urology, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Gambaro, Giovanni $u Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
700    1_
$a Skolarikos, Andreas $u Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. Electronic address: andskol@med.uoa.gr
700    1_
$a Somani, Bhaskar K $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
773    0_
$w MED00193513 $t European urology focus $x 2405-4569 $g Roč. 9, č. 1 (2023), s. 199-208
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35927160 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230418 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230425171733 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1925114 $s 1191036
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 9 $c 1 $d 199-208 $e 20220801 $i 2405-4569 $m European urology focus $n Eur Urol Focus $x MED00193513
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230418

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace