-
Something wrong with this record ?
Transaortic or Pulmonary Artery Drainage for Left Ventricular Unloading in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support: A Porcine Cardiogenic Shock Model
P. Meani, M. Mlcek, M. Kowalewski, GM. Raffa, M. Popkova, M. Pilato, A. Arcadipane, J. Belohlavek, R. Lorusso
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Pulmonary Artery diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Drainage MeSH
- Shock, Cardiogenic diagnosis etiology therapy MeSH
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation * MeSH
- Heart-Assist Devices * MeSH
- Swine MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal life support (V-A ECLS) in cardiogenic shock (CS) may lead to LV overload. The transaortic suction device (Impella, ABIOMED Inc., Danvers, MA) was compared to the pulmonary artery (PA) drainage, for LV unloading efficacy during V-A ECLS in a porcine cardiogenic shock model. A dedicated CS model included 12 swine (21 ± 1.8-week-old and weighing 54.3 ± 4.6 kg) supported with V-A ECLS and randomized to Impella or PA-related LV drainage. LV unloading and end-organ perfusion were evaluated through the PA catheter and LV pressure/volume analysis. The LV end-diastolic volume sharply dropped with Impella (143.6 ± 67.4 vs 123 ± 75.7 mL) compared to a slight decrease in the PA cannula group (134.1 ± 39.9 vs 130.1 ± 34.7 mL), resulting in an overall stroke work and pressure-volume area reductions with both techniques. However, stroke work reduction was more significant in the Impella group (V-A ECLS 3998.8 ± 2027.6 vs V-A ECLS + Impella 1796.9 ± 1033.9 mm Hg × mL, P = 0.016), leading to a more consistent pressure-volume area reduction (Impella reduction 34.7% vs PA cannula reduction 9.7%) In terms of end organ perfusion, central and mixed O2 saturation improved with V-A ECLS, and subsequently, remaining unchanged with either Impella or PA cannula as unloading strategy (SVmO2: Impella 86.0 ± 5.8 vs 87.8 ± 5.8; PA cannula 82.5 ± 10.7 vs 82.5 ± 11.3 %). Transaortic suction and PA drainage provided effective LV unloading during V-A ECLS while maintaining adequate end-organ perfusion. Impella provides a greater LV unloading effect and reduces more effectively the total LV stroke work.
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
Department of Physiology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Czech Republic
Department of Pulmonology Intensive Care Medicine Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg Germany
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23004965
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425171826.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.11.001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33171234
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Meani, Paolo $u ECLS Centrum, Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Cardiovascular Anaesthesia and Intesive Care Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: paolo.meani@mumc.nl
- 245 10
- $a Transaortic or Pulmonary Artery Drainage for Left Ventricular Unloading in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support: A Porcine Cardiogenic Shock Model / $c P. Meani, M. Mlcek, M. Kowalewski, GM. Raffa, M. Popkova, M. Pilato, A. Arcadipane, J. Belohlavek, R. Lorusso
- 520 9_
- $a The peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal life support (V-A ECLS) in cardiogenic shock (CS) may lead to LV overload. The transaortic suction device (Impella, ABIOMED Inc., Danvers, MA) was compared to the pulmonary artery (PA) drainage, for LV unloading efficacy during V-A ECLS in a porcine cardiogenic shock model. A dedicated CS model included 12 swine (21 ± 1.8-week-old and weighing 54.3 ± 4.6 kg) supported with V-A ECLS and randomized to Impella or PA-related LV drainage. LV unloading and end-organ perfusion were evaluated through the PA catheter and LV pressure/volume analysis. The LV end-diastolic volume sharply dropped with Impella (143.6 ± 67.4 vs 123 ± 75.7 mL) compared to a slight decrease in the PA cannula group (134.1 ± 39.9 vs 130.1 ± 34.7 mL), resulting in an overall stroke work and pressure-volume area reductions with both techniques. However, stroke work reduction was more significant in the Impella group (V-A ECLS 3998.8 ± 2027.6 vs V-A ECLS + Impella 1796.9 ± 1033.9 mm Hg × mL, P = 0.016), leading to a more consistent pressure-volume area reduction (Impella reduction 34.7% vs PA cannula reduction 9.7%) In terms of end organ perfusion, central and mixed O2 saturation improved with V-A ECLS, and subsequently, remaining unchanged with either Impella or PA cannula as unloading strategy (SVmO2: Impella 86.0 ± 5.8 vs 87.8 ± 5.8; PA cannula 82.5 ± 10.7 vs 82.5 ± 11.3 %). Transaortic suction and PA drainage provided effective LV unloading during V-A ECLS while maintaining adequate end-organ perfusion. Impella provides a greater LV unloading effect and reduces more effectively the total LV stroke work.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a drenáž $7 D004322
- 650 12
- $a mimotělní membránová oxygenace $7 D015199
- 650 12
- $a podpůrné srdeční systémy $7 D006353
- 650 _2
- $a arteria pulmonalis $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D011651
- 650 _2
- $a kardiogenní šok $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x terapie $7 D012770
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Mlcek, Mikulas $u Department of Pulmonology, Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany; Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kowalewski, Mariusz $u ECLS Centrum, Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Raffa, Giuseppe Maria $u ECLS Centrum, Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Popkova, Michaela $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pilato, Michele $u Intensive Care Unit, Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Arcadipane, Antonio $u Intensive Care Unit, Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Belohlavek, Jan $u Department of Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic; 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague and General University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lorusso, Roberto $u ECLS Centrum, Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004340 $t Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery $x 1532-9488 $g Roč. 33, č. 3 (2021), s. 724-732
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33171234 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425171822 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1925203 $s 1191174
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 33 $c 3 $d 724-732 $e 20201107 $i 1532-9488 $m Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery $n Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg $x MED00004340
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418
