Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Independent component analysis algorithms for non-invasive fetal electrocardiography

R. Jaros, K. Barnova, R. Vilimkova Kahankova, J. Pelisek, M. Litschmannova, R. Martinek

. 2023 ; 18 (6) : e0286858. [pub] 20230606

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The independent component analysis (ICA) based methods are among the most prevalent techniques used for non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram (NI-fECG) processing. Often, these methods are combined with other methods, such adaptive algorithms. However, there are many variants of the ICA methods and it is not clear which one is the most suitable for this task. The goal of this study is to test and objectively evaluate 11 variants of ICA methods combined with an adaptive fast transversal filter (FTF) for the purpose of extracting the NI-fECG. The methods were tested on two datasets, Labour dataset and Pregnancy dataset, which contained real records obtained during clinical practice. The efficiency of the methods was evaluated from the perspective of determining the accuracy of detection of QRS complexes through the parameters of accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), positive predictive value (PPV), and harmonic mean between SE and PPV (F1). The best results were achieved with a combination of FastICA and FTF, which yielded mean values of ACC = 83.72%, SE = 92.13%, PPV = 90.16%, and F1 = 91.14%. Time of calculation was also taken into consideration in the methods. Although FastICA was ranked to be the sixth fastest with its mean computation time of 0.452 s, it had the best ratio of performance and speed. The combination of FastICA and adaptive FTF filter turned out to be very promising. In addition, such device would require signals acquired from the abdominal area only; no need to acquire reference signal from the mother's chest.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23011104
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230801132817.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0286858 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37279195
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Jaros, Rene $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000333466467
245    10
$a Independent component analysis algorithms for non-invasive fetal electrocardiography / $c R. Jaros, K. Barnova, R. Vilimkova Kahankova, J. Pelisek, M. Litschmannova, R. Martinek
520    9_
$a The independent component analysis (ICA) based methods are among the most prevalent techniques used for non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram (NI-fECG) processing. Often, these methods are combined with other methods, such adaptive algorithms. However, there are many variants of the ICA methods and it is not clear which one is the most suitable for this task. The goal of this study is to test and objectively evaluate 11 variants of ICA methods combined with an adaptive fast transversal filter (FTF) for the purpose of extracting the NI-fECG. The methods were tested on two datasets, Labour dataset and Pregnancy dataset, which contained real records obtained during clinical practice. The efficiency of the methods was evaluated from the perspective of determining the accuracy of detection of QRS complexes through the parameters of accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), positive predictive value (PPV), and harmonic mean between SE and PPV (F1). The best results were achieved with a combination of FastICA and FTF, which yielded mean values of ACC = 83.72%, SE = 92.13%, PPV = 90.16%, and F1 = 91.14%. Time of calculation was also taken into consideration in the methods. Although FastICA was ranked to be the sixth fastest with its mean computation time of 0.452 s, it had the best ratio of performance and speed. The combination of FastICA and adaptive FTF filter turned out to be very promising. In addition, such device would require signals acquired from the abdominal area only; no need to acquire reference signal from the mother's chest.
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a monitorování plodu $x metody $7 D005323
650    12
$a počítačové zpracování signálu $7 D012815
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a plod $7 D005333
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $x metody $7 D004562
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Barnova, Katerina $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
700    1_
$a Vilimkova Kahankova, Radana $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
700    1_
$a Pelisek, Jan $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
700    1_
$a Litschmannova, Martina $u Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000189286620 $7 ola2002159179
700    1_
$a Martinek, Radek $u Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/000000032054143X
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 18, č. 6 (2023), s. e0286858
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37279195 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230801132814 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963481 $s 1197369
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 18 $c 6 $d e0286858 $e 20230606 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...