Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

On the contact tracing for COVID-19: A simulation study

L. Berec, T. Diviák, A. Kuběna, R. Levínský, R. Neruda, G. Suchopárová, J. Šlerka, M. Šmíd, J. Trnka, V. Tuček, P. Vidnerová, M. Zajíček

. 2023 ; 43 (-) : 100677. [pub] 20230316

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is one of the most effective non-pharmaceutical interventions in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study uses a multi-agent model to investigate the impact of four types of contact tracing strategies to prevent the spread of COVID-19. METHODS: In order to analyse individual contact tracing in a reasonably realistic setup, we construct an agent-based model of a small municipality with about 60.000 inhabitants (nodes) and about 2.8 million social contacts (edges) in 30 different layers. Those layers reflect demographic, geographic, sociological and other patterns of the TTWA (Travel-to-work-area) Hodonín in Czechia. Various data sources such as census, land register, transport data or data reflecting the shopping behaviour, were employed to meet this purpose. On this multi-graph structure we run a modified SEIR model of the COVID-19 dynamics. The parameters of the model are calibrated on data from the outbreak in the Czech Republic in the period March to June 2020. The simplest type of contact tracing follows just the family, the second tracing version tracks the family and all the work contacts, the third type finds all contacts with the family, work contacts and friends (leisure activities). The last one is a complete (digital) tracing capable of recalling any and all contacts. We evaluate the performance of these contact tracing strategies in four different environments. First, we consider an environment without any contact restrictions (benchmark); second with strict contact restriction (replicating the stringent non-pharmaceutical interventions employed in Czechia in the spring 2020); third environment, where the measures were substantially relaxed, and, finally an environment with weak contact restrictions and superspreader events (replicating the situation in Czechia in the summer 2020). FINDINGS: There are four main findings in our paper. 1. In general, local closures are more effective than any type of tracing. 2. In an environment with strict contact restrictions there are only small differences among the four contact tracing strategies. 3. In an environment with relaxed contact restrictions the effectiveness of the tracing strategies differs substantially. 4. In the presence of superspreader events only complete contact tracing can stop the epidemic. INTERPRETATION: In situations, where many other non-pharmaceutical interventions are in place, the specific extent of contact tracing may not have a large influence on their effectiveness. In a more relaxed setting with few contact restrictions and larger events the effectiveness of contact tracing depends heavily on their extent.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23011237
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230801132910.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100677 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36989916
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Berec, Luděk $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; Centre for Mathematical Biology, Institute of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre, Institute of Entomology, Department of Ecology, Branišovská 31, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
245    10
$a On the contact tracing for COVID-19: A simulation study / $c L. Berec, T. Diviák, A. Kuběna, R. Levínský, R. Neruda, G. Suchopárová, J. Šlerka, M. Šmíd, J. Trnka, V. Tuček, P. Vidnerová, M. Zajíček
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Contact tracing is one of the most effective non-pharmaceutical interventions in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study uses a multi-agent model to investigate the impact of four types of contact tracing strategies to prevent the spread of COVID-19. METHODS: In order to analyse individual contact tracing in a reasonably realistic setup, we construct an agent-based model of a small municipality with about 60.000 inhabitants (nodes) and about 2.8 million social contacts (edges) in 30 different layers. Those layers reflect demographic, geographic, sociological and other patterns of the TTWA (Travel-to-work-area) Hodonín in Czechia. Various data sources such as census, land register, transport data or data reflecting the shopping behaviour, were employed to meet this purpose. On this multi-graph structure we run a modified SEIR model of the COVID-19 dynamics. The parameters of the model are calibrated on data from the outbreak in the Czech Republic in the period March to June 2020. The simplest type of contact tracing follows just the family, the second tracing version tracks the family and all the work contacts, the third type finds all contacts with the family, work contacts and friends (leisure activities). The last one is a complete (digital) tracing capable of recalling any and all contacts. We evaluate the performance of these contact tracing strategies in four different environments. First, we consider an environment without any contact restrictions (benchmark); second with strict contact restriction (replicating the stringent non-pharmaceutical interventions employed in Czechia in the spring 2020); third environment, where the measures were substantially relaxed, and, finally an environment with weak contact restrictions and superspreader events (replicating the situation in Czechia in the summer 2020). FINDINGS: There are four main findings in our paper. 1. In general, local closures are more effective than any type of tracing. 2. In an environment with strict contact restrictions there are only small differences among the four contact tracing strategies. 3. In an environment with relaxed contact restrictions the effectiveness of the tracing strategies differs substantially. 4. In the presence of superspreader events only complete contact tracing can stop the epidemic. INTERPRETATION: In situations, where many other non-pharmaceutical interventions are in place, the specific extent of contact tracing may not have a large influence on their effectiveness. In a more relaxed setting with few contact restrictions and larger events the effectiveness of contact tracing depends heavily on their extent.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x epidemiologie $7 D000086382
650    _2
$a trasování kontaktů $7 D016358
650    _2
$a pandemie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D058873
650    _2
$a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
650    _2
$a epidemický výskyt choroby $x prevence a kontrola $7 D004196
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Diviák, Tomáš $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; Department of Criminology and Mitchell Centre for Social Network Analysis, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, UK
700    1_
$a Kuběna, Aleš $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Pod Vodárenskou věží 4, 18200 Praha 8, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Levínský, René $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; CERGE-EI, Politických vězňů 7, 11121 Praha 1, Czech Republic; New Media Studies, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Na Pří kopě 29, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Neruda, Roman $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science, Pod Vodárenskou věží 2, 18200 Praha 8, Czech Republic. Electronic address: roman@cs.cas.cz
700    1_
$a Suchopárová, Gabriela $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science, Pod Vodárenskou věží 2, 18200 Praha 8, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šlerka, Josef $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Pod Vodárenskou věží 4, 18200 Praha 8, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šmíd, Martin $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; New Media Studies, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Na Pří kopě 29, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Trnka, Jan $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00 Praha 10, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tuček, Vít $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; Department of Mathematics, University of Zagreb, Bijenička 30, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
700    1_
$a Vidnerová, Petra $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science, Pod Vodárenskou věží 2, 18200 Praha 8, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zajíček, Milan $u Centre for Modelling of Biological and Social Processes, Na Břehu 497/15, 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic; The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Pod Vodárenskou věží 4, 18200 Praha 8, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00166738 $t Epidemics $x 1878-0067 $g Roč. 43, č. - (2023), s. 100677
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36989916 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230801132907 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963561 $s 1197502
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 43 $c - $d 100677 $e 20230316 $i 1878-0067 $m Epidemics $n Epidemics $x MED00166738
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...