Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience

M. Vagner, DJ. Cleather, V. Olah, J. Vacek, P. Stastny

. 2023 ; 11 (8) : . [pub] 20230728

Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article, Review

Impact force and maximum velocity are important indicators of kick efficiency. Therefore, this systematic review compared the front kick (FK) and roundhouse kick (RK), including their impact force, maximum velocity, angular velocity, and execution time, considering various target types and experience levels. Following PRISMA guidelines, the Web of Science, SportDiscus, and PubMed were systematically searched for articles published from January 1982 to May 2022. Normalized kicking values were compared using one-way ANOVA. Eighteen articles included FKs (sample: 113 elite men, 109 sub-elite men, and 46 novices), and twenty-five articles included RKs (sample: 238 elite men, 143 sub-elite men, and 27 novice men). The results indicate that the impact force of the FK were 47% (p < 0.01), 92% (p < 0.01), and 120% (p < 0.01) higher than those of the RK across novice, sub-elite, and elite groups, respectively. Moreover, the maximum foot velocity of the RK was 44% (p < 0.01) and 48% (p < 0.01) higher than that of the FK for the sub-elite and elite groups, respectively. Furthermore, the elite group had 65% (p < 0.01) higher knee extension angular velocity with the RK than with the FK and 138% (p < 0.01) higher hip extension angular velocity with the FK than with the RK. In summary, the findings suggest that the FK is more effective in generating forceful kicks, while the RK has the potential for rapid execution.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23015602
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231020093556.0
007      
ta
008      
231010s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/sports11080141 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37624121
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Vagner, Michal $u Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Military, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213430187
245    12
$a A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience / $c M. Vagner, DJ. Cleather, V. Olah, J. Vacek, P. Stastny
520    9_
$a Impact force and maximum velocity are important indicators of kick efficiency. Therefore, this systematic review compared the front kick (FK) and roundhouse kick (RK), including their impact force, maximum velocity, angular velocity, and execution time, considering various target types and experience levels. Following PRISMA guidelines, the Web of Science, SportDiscus, and PubMed were systematically searched for articles published from January 1982 to May 2022. Normalized kicking values were compared using one-way ANOVA. Eighteen articles included FKs (sample: 113 elite men, 109 sub-elite men, and 46 novices), and twenty-five articles included RKs (sample: 238 elite men, 143 sub-elite men, and 27 novice men). The results indicate that the impact force of the FK were 47% (p < 0.01), 92% (p < 0.01), and 120% (p < 0.01) higher than those of the RK across novice, sub-elite, and elite groups, respectively. Moreover, the maximum foot velocity of the RK was 44% (p < 0.01) and 48% (p < 0.01) higher than that of the FK for the sub-elite and elite groups, respectively. Furthermore, the elite group had 65% (p < 0.01) higher knee extension angular velocity with the RK than with the FK and 138% (p < 0.01) higher hip extension angular velocity with the FK than with the RK. In summary, the findings suggest that the FK is more effective in generating forceful kicks, while the RK has the potential for rapid execution.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Cleather, Daniel John $u Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St. Mary's University, Waldegrave Road, Twickenham TW1 4SX, UK
700    1_
$a Olah, Vladan $u Department of Military, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vacek, Jan $u Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000298452130
700    1_
$a Stastny, Petr $u Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000032841374X $7 xx0145353
773    0_
$w MED00195473 $t Sports (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2075-4663 $g Roč. 11, č. 8 (2023)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37624121 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231010 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231020093549 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1997205 $s 1201964
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 11 $c 8 $e 20230728 $i 2075-4663 $m Sports $n Sports (Basel) $x MED00195473
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231010

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...