-
Something wrong with this record ?
A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience
M. Vagner, DJ. Cleather, V. Olah, J. Vacek, P. Stastny
Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article, Review
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2016
Europe PubMed Central
from 2016
ProQuest Central
from 2013-03-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Impact force and maximum velocity are important indicators of kick efficiency. Therefore, this systematic review compared the front kick (FK) and roundhouse kick (RK), including their impact force, maximum velocity, angular velocity, and execution time, considering various target types and experience levels. Following PRISMA guidelines, the Web of Science, SportDiscus, and PubMed were systematically searched for articles published from January 1982 to May 2022. Normalized kicking values were compared using one-way ANOVA. Eighteen articles included FKs (sample: 113 elite men, 109 sub-elite men, and 46 novices), and twenty-five articles included RKs (sample: 238 elite men, 143 sub-elite men, and 27 novice men). The results indicate that the impact force of the FK were 47% (p < 0.01), 92% (p < 0.01), and 120% (p < 0.01) higher than those of the RK across novice, sub-elite, and elite groups, respectively. Moreover, the maximum foot velocity of the RK was 44% (p < 0.01) and 48% (p < 0.01) higher than that of the FK for the sub-elite and elite groups, respectively. Furthermore, the elite group had 65% (p < 0.01) higher knee extension angular velocity with the RK than with the FK and 138% (p < 0.01) higher hip extension angular velocity with the FK than with the RK. In summary, the findings suggest that the FK is more effective in generating forceful kicks, while the RK has the potential for rapid execution.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23015602
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231020093556.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231010s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/sports11080141 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37624121
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Vagner, Michal $u Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Military, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213430187
- 245 12
- $a A Systematic Review of Dynamic Forces and Kinematic Indicators of Front and Roundhouse Kicks across Varied Conditions and Participant Experience / $c M. Vagner, DJ. Cleather, V. Olah, J. Vacek, P. Stastny
- 520 9_
- $a Impact force and maximum velocity are important indicators of kick efficiency. Therefore, this systematic review compared the front kick (FK) and roundhouse kick (RK), including their impact force, maximum velocity, angular velocity, and execution time, considering various target types and experience levels. Following PRISMA guidelines, the Web of Science, SportDiscus, and PubMed were systematically searched for articles published from January 1982 to May 2022. Normalized kicking values were compared using one-way ANOVA. Eighteen articles included FKs (sample: 113 elite men, 109 sub-elite men, and 46 novices), and twenty-five articles included RKs (sample: 238 elite men, 143 sub-elite men, and 27 novice men). The results indicate that the impact force of the FK were 47% (p < 0.01), 92% (p < 0.01), and 120% (p < 0.01) higher than those of the RK across novice, sub-elite, and elite groups, respectively. Moreover, the maximum foot velocity of the RK was 44% (p < 0.01) and 48% (p < 0.01) higher than that of the FK for the sub-elite and elite groups, respectively. Furthermore, the elite group had 65% (p < 0.01) higher knee extension angular velocity with the RK than with the FK and 138% (p < 0.01) higher hip extension angular velocity with the FK than with the RK. In summary, the findings suggest that the FK is more effective in generating forceful kicks, while the RK has the potential for rapid execution.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Cleather, Daniel John $u Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St. Mary's University, Waldegrave Road, Twickenham TW1 4SX, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Olah, Vladan $u Department of Military, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vacek, Jan $u Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000298452130
- 700 1_
- $a Stastny, Petr $u Department of Sports Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000032841374X $7 xx0145353
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195473 $t Sports (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2075-4663 $g Roč. 11, č. 8 (2023)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37624121 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231010 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231020093549 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1997205 $s 1201964
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 11 $c 8 $e 20230728 $i 2075-4663 $m Sports $n Sports (Basel) $x MED00195473
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231010