• Something wrong with this record ?

Psychometric Properties of the BAASIS: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

K. Denhaerynck, F. Dobbels, B. Košťálová, S. De Geest, BAASIS Consortium

. 2023 ; 107 (8) : 1795-1809. [pub] 20230323

Language English Country United States

Document type Meta-Analysis, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to immunosuppressives, a risk factor for poor posttransplant outcomes, can be assessed by self-report using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS). Available in written and interview versions, and previously validated on content, the BAASIS is widely used in research and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate its psychometric properties. METHODS: Using a literature search and our BAASIS database, this meta-analysis identified completed studies in adult transplant recipients whose data were usable to examine the BAASIS' reliability and 3 validity aspects: (1) relationships with other variables (electronic monitoring, other self-report scales, tacrolimus blood-level variability, collateral report, depressive symptoms, psycho-behavioral constructs, and interventions); (2) response processes; and (3) internal structure. Testing used random-effects logistic regressions. RESULTS: Our sample included 12 109 graft recipients from 26 studies. Of these 26, a total of 20 provided individual participant data. Evidence of the BAASIS' stability over time supports its reliability. Validity testing of relationships with other variables showed that BAASIS-assessed nonadherence was significantly associated with the selected variables: electronically monitored nonadherence ( P < 0.03), other self- and collaterally-reported nonadherence ( P < 0.001), higher variability in tacrolimus concentrations ( P = 0.02), higher barriers ( P < 0.001), lower self-efficacy ( P < 0.001), lower intention ( P < 0.001), and higher worries ( P = 0.02). Nonadherence also decreased after regimen change interventions ( P = 0.03). Response process evaluation indicated good readability and slightly higher nonadherence with the written version. Structurally, items on taking and timing shared variability. CONCLUSIONS: The BAASIS shows good validity and reliability as a self-report instrument to assess medication nonadherence in transplantation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016770
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026105548.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/TP.0000000000004574 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36949037
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Denhaerynck, Kris $u Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland
245    10
$a Psychometric Properties of the BAASIS: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data / $c K. Denhaerynck, F. Dobbels, B. Košťálová, S. De Geest, BAASIS Consortium
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to immunosuppressives, a risk factor for poor posttransplant outcomes, can be assessed by self-report using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS). Available in written and interview versions, and previously validated on content, the BAASIS is widely used in research and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate its psychometric properties. METHODS: Using a literature search and our BAASIS database, this meta-analysis identified completed studies in adult transplant recipients whose data were usable to examine the BAASIS' reliability and 3 validity aspects: (1) relationships with other variables (electronic monitoring, other self-report scales, tacrolimus blood-level variability, collateral report, depressive symptoms, psycho-behavioral constructs, and interventions); (2) response processes; and (3) internal structure. Testing used random-effects logistic regressions. RESULTS: Our sample included 12 109 graft recipients from 26 studies. Of these 26, a total of 20 provided individual participant data. Evidence of the BAASIS' stability over time supports its reliability. Validity testing of relationships with other variables showed that BAASIS-assessed nonadherence was significantly associated with the selected variables: electronically monitored nonadherence ( P < 0.03), other self- and collaterally-reported nonadherence ( P < 0.001), higher variability in tacrolimus concentrations ( P = 0.02), higher barriers ( P < 0.001), lower self-efficacy ( P < 0.001), lower intention ( P < 0.001), and higher worries ( P = 0.02). Nonadherence also decreased after regimen change interventions ( P = 0.03). Response process evaluation indicated good readability and slightly higher nonadherence with the written version. Structurally, items on taking and timing shared variability. CONCLUSIONS: The BAASIS shows good validity and reliability as a self-report instrument to assess medication nonadherence in transplantation.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a takrolimus $7 D016559
650    _2
$a psychometrie $7 D011594
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    12
$a imunosupresiva $x terapeutické užití $7 D007166
650    _2
$a zpráva o sobě $7 D057566
650    _2
$a adherence k farmakoterapii $7 D055118
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dobbels, Fabienne $u Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Košťálová, Barbora $u Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a De Geest, Sabina $u Institute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland $u Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
710    2_
$a BAASIS Consortium
773    0_
$w MED00010695 $t Transplantation $x 1534-6080 $g Roč. 107, č. 8 (2023), s. 1795-1809
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36949037 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026105543 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000353 $s 1203132
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 107 $c 8 $d 1795-1809 $e 20230323 $i 1534-6080 $m Transplantation $n Transplantation $x MED00010695
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...