• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

R. Kaiser, L. Kantorová, A. Langaufová, S. Slezáková, D. Tučková, M. Klugar, Z. Klézl, P. Barsa, J. Cienciala, R. Hajdúk, L. Hrabálek, R. Kučera, D. Netuka, M. Prýmek, M. Repko, M. Smrčka, J. Štulík

. 2023 ; 94 (8) : 657-666. [pub] 20230227

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23016777
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1944-07-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1944-07-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1944-07-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 1944-07-01 do Před 6 měsíci

Odkazy

PubMed 36849239
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS: We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0-100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI -4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD -5·92 points (95% CI -11.00 to -0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD -1.25 points (95% CI -6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022308267.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016777
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026105545.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36849239
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Kaiser, Radek $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic Radek.Kaiser@uvn.cz $u Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000259859595 $7 xx0189785
245    10
$a Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials / $c R. Kaiser, L. Kantorová, A. Langaufová, S. Slezáková, D. Tučková, M. Klugar, Z. Klézl, P. Barsa, J. Cienciala, R. Hajdúk, L. Hrabálek, R. Kučera, D. Netuka, M. Prýmek, M. Repko, M. Smrčka, J. Štulík
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS: We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0-100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI -4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD -5·92 points (95% CI -11.00 to -0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD -1.25 points (95% CI -6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022308267.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a chirurgická dekomprese $x metody $7 D019299
650    12
$a spinální stenóza $7 D013130
650    12
$a spondylolistéza $x komplikace $x chirurgie $7 D013168
650    _2
$a bederní obratle $x chirurgie $7 D008159
650    12
$a fúze páteře $x metody $7 D013123
650    _2
$a bolest $7 D010146
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kantorová, Lucia $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic $u Czech Health Research Council, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Langaufová, Alena $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Slezáková, Simona $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tučková, Dagmar $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic $u Czech Health Research Council, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klugar, Miloslav $u Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000228047295 $7 mzk2015879957
700    1_
$a Klézl, Zdeněk $u Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Barsa, Pavel $u Department of Neurosurgery, Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cienciala, Jan $u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hajdúk, Richard $u Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hrabálek, Lumír $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kučera, Roman $u Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Netuka, David $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Prýmek, Martin $u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Repko, Martin $u Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Smrčka, Martin $u University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Štulík, Jan $u Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00010064 $t Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry $x 1468-330X $g Roč. 94, č. 8 (2023), s. 657-666
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36849239 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026105539 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000359 $s 1203139
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 94 $c 8 $d 657-666 $e 20230227 $i 1468-330X $m Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry $n J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry $x MED00010064
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace