-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Measurement of the time structure of FLASH beams using prompt gamma rays and secondary neutrons as surrogates
S. Charyyev, R. Liu, X. Yang, J. Zhou, A. Dhabaan, WS. Dynan, C. Oancea, L. Lin
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37285847
DOI
10.1088/1361-6560/acdc7c
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- neutrony MeSH
- protonová terapie * metody MeSH
- protony MeSH
- radiometrie * metody MeSH
- záření gama MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of online monitoring of irradiation time (IRT) and scan time for FLASH proton radiotherapy using a pixelated semiconductor detector.Approach. Measurements of the time structure of FLASH irradiations were performed using fast, pixelated spectral detectors based on the Timepix3 (TPX3) chips with two architectures: AdvaPIX-TPX3 and Minipix-TPX3. The latter has a fraction of its sensor coated with a material to increase sensitivity to neutrons. With little or no dead time and an ability to resolve events that are closely spaced in time (tens of nanoseconds), both detectors can accurately determine IRTs as long as pulse pile-up is avoided. To avoid pulse pile-up, the detectors were placed well beyond the Bragg peak or at a large scattering angle. Prompt gamma rays and secondary neutrons were registered in the detectors' sensors and IRTs were calculated based on timestamps of the first charge carriers (beam-on) and the last charge carriers (beam-off). In addition, scan times inx,y, and diagonal directions were measured. The experiment was carried out for various setups: (i) a single spot, (ii) a small animal field, (iii) a patient field, and (iv) an experiment using an anthropomorphic phantom to demonstratein vivoonline monitoring of IRT. All measurements were compared to vendor log files.Main results. Differences between measurements and log files for a single spot, a small animal field, and a patient field were within 1%, 0.3% and 1%, respectively.In vivomonitoring of IRTs (95-270 ms) was accurate within 0.1% for AdvaPIX-TPX3 and within 6.1% for Minipix-TPX3. The scan times inx,y, and diagonal directions were 4.0, 3.4, and 4.0 ms, respectively.Significance. Overall, the AdvaPIX-TPX3 can measure FLASH IRTs within 1% accuracy, indicating that prompt gamma rays are a good surrogate for primary protons. The Minipix-TPX3 showed a somewhat higher discrepancy, likely due to the late arrival of thermal neutrons to the detector sensor and lower readout speed. The scan times (3.4 ± 0.05 ms) in the 60 mm distance ofy-direction were slightly less than (4.0 ± 0.06 ms) in the 24 mm distance ofx-direction, confirming the much faster scanning speed of the Y magnets than that of X. Diagonal scan speed was limited by the slower X magnets.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23016896
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231026105500.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1088/1361-6560/acdc7c $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37285847
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Charyyev, Serdar $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America $1 https://orcid.org/0000000324864818
- 245 10
- $a Measurement of the time structure of FLASH beams using prompt gamma rays and secondary neutrons as surrogates / $c S. Charyyev, R. Liu, X. Yang, J. Zhou, A. Dhabaan, WS. Dynan, C. Oancea, L. Lin
- 520 9_
- $a Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of online monitoring of irradiation time (IRT) and scan time for FLASH proton radiotherapy using a pixelated semiconductor detector.Approach. Measurements of the time structure of FLASH irradiations were performed using fast, pixelated spectral detectors based on the Timepix3 (TPX3) chips with two architectures: AdvaPIX-TPX3 and Minipix-TPX3. The latter has a fraction of its sensor coated with a material to increase sensitivity to neutrons. With little or no dead time and an ability to resolve events that are closely spaced in time (tens of nanoseconds), both detectors can accurately determine IRTs as long as pulse pile-up is avoided. To avoid pulse pile-up, the detectors were placed well beyond the Bragg peak or at a large scattering angle. Prompt gamma rays and secondary neutrons were registered in the detectors' sensors and IRTs were calculated based on timestamps of the first charge carriers (beam-on) and the last charge carriers (beam-off). In addition, scan times inx,y, and diagonal directions were measured. The experiment was carried out for various setups: (i) a single spot, (ii) a small animal field, (iii) a patient field, and (iv) an experiment using an anthropomorphic phantom to demonstratein vivoonline monitoring of IRT. All measurements were compared to vendor log files.Main results. Differences between measurements and log files for a single spot, a small animal field, and a patient field were within 1%, 0.3% and 1%, respectively.In vivomonitoring of IRTs (95-270 ms) was accurate within 0.1% for AdvaPIX-TPX3 and within 6.1% for Minipix-TPX3. The scan times inx,y, and diagonal directions were 4.0, 3.4, and 4.0 ms, respectively.Significance. Overall, the AdvaPIX-TPX3 can measure FLASH IRTs within 1% accuracy, indicating that prompt gamma rays are a good surrogate for primary protons. The Minipix-TPX3 showed a somewhat higher discrepancy, likely due to the late arrival of thermal neutrons to the detector sensor and lower readout speed. The scan times (3.4 ± 0.05 ms) in the 60 mm distance ofy-direction were slightly less than (4.0 ± 0.06 ms) in the 24 mm distance ofx-direction, confirming the much faster scanning speed of the Y magnets than that of X. Diagonal scan speed was limited by the slower X magnets.
- 650 12
- $a radiometrie $x metody $7 D011874
- 650 _2
- $a záření gama $7 D005720
- 650 12
- $a protonová terapie $x metody $7 D061766
- 650 _2
- $a protony $7 D011522
- 650 _2
- $a neutrony $7 D009502
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Liu, Ruirui $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
- 700 1_
- $a Yang, Xiaofeng $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America $1 https://orcid.org/0000000190235855
- 700 1_
- $a Zhou, Jun $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
- 700 1_
- $a Dhabaan, Anees $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
- 700 1_
- $a Dynan, William S $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America $u Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
- 700 1_
- $a Oancea, Cristina $u ADVACAM, Prague, Czech Republic $u University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
- 700 1_
- $a Lin, Liyong $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States of America
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003821 $t Physics in medicine and biology $x 1361-6560 $g Roč. 68, č. 14 (2023)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37285847 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231026105455 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000430 $s 1203258
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 68 $c 14 $e 20230712 $i 1361-6560 $m Physics in medicine and biology $n Phys Med Biol $x MED00003821
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013