Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Marginal versus Segmental Mandibulectomy in the Treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CM. Chiesa-Estomba, M. Mayo-Yanez, G. Manelli, G. Molteni, J. Lechien, N. Fakhry, A. Melkane, C. Calvo-Henriquez, D. Kalfert, T. Ayad

. 2023 ; 27 (4) : e733-e743. [pub] 20230411

Status not-indexed Language English Country Brazil

Document type Journal Article, Review

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23022792

Introduction Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is the most common malignancy in the oral cavity. Two types of mandibular resections have been described: the segmental mandibulectomy and the marginal mandibulectomy. Both may have a different impact over the quality of life, oncological prognosis, and functional or aesthetic result. Objectives The aim of this study was to systematically explore the literature to determine the survival outcomes and disease control rates in patients who underwent segmental or marginal mandibulectomy for OCSCC with histological evidence of cortical and medullary bone invasion. Data Synthesis This review involved a systematic search of the electronic databases MEDLINE/PUBMED, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus including articles from 1985 to 2019. Fifteen articles were included for qualitative analysis and 11 articles were considered for meta-analysis calculations. All of them correspond to retrospective cohort studies. Conclusion This systematic review reveals the low-level evidence regarding the impact over local control or survival according to the type of mandibulectomy. Our results need to be considered with precaution according to the limited evidence available. We just found difference regarding the 5-year disease-free survival, and a tendency in favor of segmental mandibulectomy was confirmed when medullary invasion was evident.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23022792
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240116163134.0
007      
ta
008      
240105s2023 bl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1055/s-0042-1750764 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37876698
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a bl
100    1_
$a Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos Miguel $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Donostia, San Sebastian, Guipuzcoa, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000194549464
245    10
$a Marginal versus Segmental Mandibulectomy in the Treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis / $c CM. Chiesa-Estomba, M. Mayo-Yanez, G. Manelli, G. Molteni, J. Lechien, N. Fakhry, A. Melkane, C. Calvo-Henriquez, D. Kalfert, T. Ayad
520    9_
$a Introduction Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is the most common malignancy in the oral cavity. Two types of mandibular resections have been described: the segmental mandibulectomy and the marginal mandibulectomy. Both may have a different impact over the quality of life, oncological prognosis, and functional or aesthetic result. Objectives The aim of this study was to systematically explore the literature to determine the survival outcomes and disease control rates in patients who underwent segmental or marginal mandibulectomy for OCSCC with histological evidence of cortical and medullary bone invasion. Data Synthesis This review involved a systematic search of the electronic databases MEDLINE/PUBMED, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus including articles from 1985 to 2019. Fifteen articles were included for qualitative analysis and 11 articles were considered for meta-analysis calculations. All of them correspond to retrospective cohort studies. Conclusion This systematic review reveals the low-level evidence regarding the impact over local control or survival according to the type of mandibulectomy. Our results need to be considered with precaution according to the limited evidence available. We just found difference regarding the 5-year disease-free survival, and a tendency in favor of segmental mandibulectomy was confirmed when medullary invasion was evident.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Mayo-Yanez, Miguel $u Department of ENT, Hospital Juan Canalejo de La Coruña, A Coruna, Galicia, Spain
700    1_
$a Manelli, Giuditta $u Department of ENT, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Toscana, Italy
700    1_
$a Molteni, Gabriele $u Department of ENT, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
700    1_
$a Lechien, Jerome $u Department of ENT, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, Île-de-France, France
700    1_
$a Fakhry, Nicolas $u Department of ENT, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azu, France
700    1_
$a Melkane, Antoine $u Department of ENT, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu de France, Beirut, Lebanon
700    1_
$a Calvo-Henriquez, Christian $u Department of ENT, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
700    1_
$a Kalfert, David $u Department of ENT, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ayad, Tareck $u Department of ENT, University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
773    0_
$w MED00165468 $t International archives of otorhinolaryngology $x 1809-9777 $g Roč. 27, č. 4 (2023), s. e733-e743
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37876698 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240116163131 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2036395 $s 1209237
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 27 $c 4 $d e733-e743 $e 20230411 $i 1809-9777 $m International archives of otorhinolaryngology $n Int. Arch. otorhinolaryngol. $x MED00165468
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240105

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options