-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Pedestrian Safety in Frontal Tram Collision, Part 1: Historical Overview and Experimental-Data-Based Biomechanical Study of Head Clashing in Frontal and Side Impacts
F. Lopot, L. Tomsovsky, F. Marsik, J. Masek, P. Kubovy, R. Jezdik, M. Sorfova, B. Hajkova, D. Hylmarova, M. Havlicek, O. Stocek, M. Doubek, T. Tikkanen, M. Svoboda, K. Jelen
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
Grantová podpora
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008401
Ministry of Education Youth and Sports
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2003
Europe PubMed Central
od 2003
ProQuest Central
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2003-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2001-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
PubMed
37960520
DOI
10.3390/s23218819
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chodci * MeSH
- chůze MeSH
- dopravní nehody MeSH
- kraniocerebrální traumata * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- motorová vozidla MeSH
- rány a poranění * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
This article represents the first paper in a two-part series dealing with safety during tram-pedestrian collisions. This research is dedicated to the safety of trams for pedestrians during collisions and is motivated by the increased number of lethal cases. The first part of this paper includes an overview of tram face development from the earliest designs to the current ones in use and, at the same time, provides a synopsis and explanation of the technical context, including a link to current and forthcoming legislation. The historical design development can be characterised by three steps, from an almost vertical front face, to leaned and pointed shapes, to the current inclined low-edged windshield without a protruding coupler. However, since most major manufacturers now export their products worldwide and customisation is only of a technically insignificant nature, our conclusions are generalisable (supported by the example of Berlin). The most advantageous shape of the tram's front, minimising the effects on pedestrians in all collision phases, has evolved rather spontaneously and was unprompted, and it is now being built into the European Commission regulations. The goal of the second part of this paper is to conduct a series of tram-pedestrian collisions with a focus on the frontal and side impacts using a crash test dummy (anthropomorphic test device-ATD). Four tram types approaching the collision at four different impact speeds (5 km/h, 10 km/h, 15 km/h, and 20 km/h) were used. The primary outcome variable was the resultant head acceleration. The risk and severity of possible head injuries were assessed using the head injury criterion (HIC15) and its linkage to the injury level on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). The results showed increasing head impacts with an increasing speed for all tram types and collision scenarios. Higher values of head acceleration were reached during the frontal impact (17-124 g) compared to the side one (2-84 g). The HIC15 values did not exceed the value of 300 for any experimental setting, and the probability of AIS4+ injuries did not exceed 10%. The outcomes of tram-pedestrian collisions can be influenced by the ATD's position and orientation, the impact speed and front-end design of trams, and the site of initial contact.
2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University 150 06 Prague Czech Republic
Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics Charles University 162 52 Prague Czech Republic
Department of Designing and Machine Elements Czech Technical University 166 29 Prague Czech Republic
Dopravní Podnik Hlavního Města Prahy 190 22 Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Thermomechanics CAS 182 00 Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000966
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093529.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/s23218819 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37960520
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Lopot, Frantisek $u Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Designing and Machine Elements, Czech Technical University, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Pedestrian Safety in Frontal Tram Collision, Part 1: Historical Overview and Experimental-Data-Based Biomechanical Study of Head Clashing in Frontal and Side Impacts / $c F. Lopot, L. Tomsovsky, F. Marsik, J. Masek, P. Kubovy, R. Jezdik, M. Sorfova, B. Hajkova, D. Hylmarova, M. Havlicek, O. Stocek, M. Doubek, T. Tikkanen, M. Svoboda, K. Jelen
- 520 9_
- $a This article represents the first paper in a two-part series dealing with safety during tram-pedestrian collisions. This research is dedicated to the safety of trams for pedestrians during collisions and is motivated by the increased number of lethal cases. The first part of this paper includes an overview of tram face development from the earliest designs to the current ones in use and, at the same time, provides a synopsis and explanation of the technical context, including a link to current and forthcoming legislation. The historical design development can be characterised by three steps, from an almost vertical front face, to leaned and pointed shapes, to the current inclined low-edged windshield without a protruding coupler. However, since most major manufacturers now export their products worldwide and customisation is only of a technically insignificant nature, our conclusions are generalisable (supported by the example of Berlin). The most advantageous shape of the tram's front, minimising the effects on pedestrians in all collision phases, has evolved rather spontaneously and was unprompted, and it is now being built into the European Commission regulations. The goal of the second part of this paper is to conduct a series of tram-pedestrian collisions with a focus on the frontal and side impacts using a crash test dummy (anthropomorphic test device-ATD). Four tram types approaching the collision at four different impact speeds (5 km/h, 10 km/h, 15 km/h, and 20 km/h) were used. The primary outcome variable was the resultant head acceleration. The risk and severity of possible head injuries were assessed using the head injury criterion (HIC15) and its linkage to the injury level on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). The results showed increasing head impacts with an increasing speed for all tram types and collision scenarios. Higher values of head acceleration were reached during the frontal impact (17-124 g) compared to the side one (2-84 g). The HIC15 values did not exceed the value of 300 for any experimental setting, and the probability of AIS4+ injuries did not exceed 10%. The outcomes of tram-pedestrian collisions can be influenced by the ATD's position and orientation, the impact speed and front-end design of trams, and the site of initial contact.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a dopravní nehody $7 D000063
- 650 12
- $a kraniocerebrální traumata $7 D006259
- 650 _2
- $a motorová vozidla $7 D018986
- 650 12
- $a chodci $7 D000069636
- 650 _2
- $a chůze $7 D016138
- 650 12
- $a rány a poranění $7 D014947
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Tomsovsky, Lubos $u Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000300476028
- 700 1_
- $a Marsik, Frantisek $u Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Thermomechanics, CAS, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Masek, Jan $u VUKV a.s., 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kubovy, Petr $u Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jezdik, Roman $u VUKV a.s., 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sorfova, Monika $u Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000234427796 $7 xx0233464
- 700 1_
- $a Hajkova, Barbora $u Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hylmarova, Dita $u Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Havlicek, Martin $u Department of Designing and Machine Elements, Czech Technical University, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Stocek, Ondrej $u Department of Designing and Machine Elements, Czech Technical University, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Doubek, Martin $u Dopravní Podnik Hlavního Města Prahy, 190 22 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tikkanen, Tommi $u GIM Oy, 02650 Espoo, Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Svoboda, Martin $u Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University, Pasteurova 3544/1, 400 96 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000273441531
- 700 1_
- $a Jelen, Karel $u Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic $u Second Faculty of Medicine (2. LF UK), Charles University, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000281519810
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008309 $t Sensors $x 1424-8220 $g Roč. 23, č. 21 (2023)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37960520 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093526 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049537 $s 1210660
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 23 $c 21 $e 20231030 $i 1424-8220 $m Sensors $n Sensors Basel $x MED00008309
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008401 $p Ministry of Education Youth and Sports
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109