-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Biomechanical performance of dental implants inserted in different mandible locations and at different angles: A finite element study
B. Thomková, P. Marcián, L. Borák, M. Joukal, J. Wolff
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- analýza metodou konečných prvků MeSH
- analýza zatížení zubů metody MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- mandibula diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- mechanický stres MeSH
- zubní implantáty * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Accurate implant placement is essential for the success of dental implants. This placement influences osseointegration and occlusal forces. The freehand technique, despite its cost-effectiveness and time efficiency, may result in significant angular deviations compared with guided implantation, but the effect of angular deviations on the stress-strain state of peri-implant bone is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to examine the effects of angular deviations on stress-strain states in peri-implant bone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computational modeling was used to investigate 4 different configurations of dental implant positions, each with 3 angles of insertion. The model was developed using computed tomography images, and typical mastication forces were considered. Strains were analyzed using the mechanostat hypothesis. RESULTS: The location of the implant had a significant impact on bone strain intensity. An angular deviation of ±5 degrees from the planned inclination did not significantly affect cancellous bone strains, which primarily support the implant. However, it had a substantial effect on strains in the cortical bone near the implant. Such deviations also significantly influenced implant stresses, especially when the support from the cortical bone was uneven or poorly localized. CONCLUSIONS: In extreme situations, angular deviations can lead to overstraining the cortical bone, risking implant failure from unfavorable interaction with the implant. Accurate implant placement is essential to mitigate these risks.
Associate Professor Department of Anatomy Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Professor Department of Dentistry and Oral Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24007813
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423160306.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.012 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37919129
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Thomková, Barbora $u Graduate student, Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Biomechanical performance of dental implants inserted in different mandible locations and at different angles: A finite element study / $c B. Thomková, P. Marcián, L. Borák, M. Joukal, J. Wolff
- 520 9_
- $a STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Accurate implant placement is essential for the success of dental implants. This placement influences osseointegration and occlusal forces. The freehand technique, despite its cost-effectiveness and time efficiency, may result in significant angular deviations compared with guided implantation, but the effect of angular deviations on the stress-strain state of peri-implant bone is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to examine the effects of angular deviations on stress-strain states in peri-implant bone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computational modeling was used to investigate 4 different configurations of dental implant positions, each with 3 angles of insertion. The model was developed using computed tomography images, and typical mastication forces were considered. Strains were analyzed using the mechanostat hypothesis. RESULTS: The location of the implant had a significant impact on bone strain intensity. An angular deviation of ±5 degrees from the planned inclination did not significantly affect cancellous bone strains, which primarily support the implant. However, it had a substantial effect on strains in the cortical bone near the implant. Such deviations also significantly influenced implant stresses, especially when the support from the cortical bone was uneven or poorly localized. CONCLUSIONS: In extreme situations, angular deviations can lead to overstraining the cortical bone, risking implant failure from unfavorable interaction with the implant. Accurate implant placement is essential to mitigate these risks.
- 650 12
- $a zubní implantáty $7 D015921
- 650 _2
- $a analýza metodou konečných prvků $7 D020342
- 650 _2
- $a analýza zatížení zubů $x metody $7 D003799
- 650 _2
- $a mechanický stres $7 D013314
- 650 _2
- $a mandibula $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D008334
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Marcián, Petr $u Graduate student, Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: marcian@fme.vutbr.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Borák, Libor $u Graduate student, Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Joukal, Marek $u Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Wolff, Jan $u Professor, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002910 $t The Journal of prosthetic dentistry $x 1097-6841 $g Roč. 131, č. 1 (2024), s. 128.e1-128.e10
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37919129 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423160303 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2081671 $s 1217580
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 131 $c 1 $d 128.e1-128.e10 $e 20231101 $i 1097-6841 $m The Journal of prosthetic dentistry $n J Prosthet Dent $x MED00002910
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412