• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

No differences were observed in the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis among preterm infants who received either single-species or multi-species probiotics

P. Korček, Z. Straňák

. 2024 ; 194 (-) : 106054. [pub] 20240522

Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24013352

BACKGROUND: Probiotic prophylaxis has been suggested to reduce the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in very preterm newborns. However, choosing the optimal probiotic is difficult due to variations in strain-specific effects and interactions facilitated by the use of combination species. AIMS: To compare clinical outcomes of very preterm infants receiving multi or single-species probiotics. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, cohort study. SUBJECTS: Very preterm infants (<32 weeks' gestation) born between 2019 and 2022 at a tertiary perinatal center received either a multi-species (Lactobacillus rhamnosus 45 %, Lactobacillus casei 15 %, Lactobacillus acidophilus 15 %, Bifidobacterium infantis 15 %, Bifidobacterium bifidum 10 %; n = 228) or a single-species (Bifidobacterium breve BR03 and B632; n = 227) probiotic formulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: NEC, LOS, and mortality. RESULTS: The overall incidence of NEC and LOS was 3.1 % and 13.8 %, respectively. There were no differences between the multi-species and single-species probiotic groups in the rate of NEC (3.5 % vs 2.6 %; p = 0.787), LOS (15.4 % vs 12.3 %; p = 0.416), mortality (0.9 % vs 1.8 %; p = 0.449), or composite outcome (NEC, LOS and/or death; 16.7 % vs 12.8 %; p = 0.290). CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of very preterm newborns receiving multi vs. single-species probiotic formulations were similar in our study. In view of the sample size and low baseline rate of NEC in our unit, further trials are warranted to investigate the effects of specific probiotics for prevention of serious neonatal morbidities.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24013352
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240905133344.0
007      
ta
008      
240725e20240522ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106054 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38795665
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Korček, Peter $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Neonatology, Prague 147 00, Czech Republic; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 100 00, Czech Republic. Electronic address: peter.korcek@upmd.eu
245    10
$a No differences were observed in the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis among preterm infants who received either single-species or multi-species probiotics / $c P. Korček, Z. Straňák
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Probiotic prophylaxis has been suggested to reduce the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) in very preterm newborns. However, choosing the optimal probiotic is difficult due to variations in strain-specific effects and interactions facilitated by the use of combination species. AIMS: To compare clinical outcomes of very preterm infants receiving multi or single-species probiotics. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, cohort study. SUBJECTS: Very preterm infants (<32 weeks' gestation) born between 2019 and 2022 at a tertiary perinatal center received either a multi-species (Lactobacillus rhamnosus 45 %, Lactobacillus casei 15 %, Lactobacillus acidophilus 15 %, Bifidobacterium infantis 15 %, Bifidobacterium bifidum 10 %; n = 228) or a single-species (Bifidobacterium breve BR03 and B632; n = 227) probiotic formulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: NEC, LOS, and mortality. RESULTS: The overall incidence of NEC and LOS was 3.1 % and 13.8 %, respectively. There were no differences between the multi-species and single-species probiotic groups in the rate of NEC (3.5 % vs 2.6 %; p = 0.787), LOS (15.4 % vs 12.3 %; p = 0.416), mortality (0.9 % vs 1.8 %; p = 0.449), or composite outcome (NEC, LOS and/or death; 16.7 % vs 12.8 %; p = 0.290). CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of very preterm newborns receiving multi vs. single-species probiotic formulations were similar in our study. In view of the sample size and low baseline rate of NEC in our unit, further trials are warranted to investigate the effects of specific probiotics for prevention of serious neonatal morbidities.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a probiotika $x terapeutické užití $7 D019936
650    12
$a nekrotizující enterokolitida $x prevence a kontrola $x epidemiologie $7 D020345
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a novorozenec nedonošený $7 D007234
650    _2
$a sepse $x prevence a kontrola $x epidemiologie $7 D018805
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a nemoci nedonošenců $x prevence a kontrola $x epidemiologie $7 D007235
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Straňák, Zbyněk $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Neonatology, Prague 147 00, Czech Republic; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 100 00, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00001465 $t Early human development $x 1872-6232 $g Roč. 194 (20240522), s. 106054
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38795665 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240725 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240905133338 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2143270 $s 1225218
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 194 $c - $d 106054 $e 20240522 $i 1872-6232 $m Early human development $n Early Hum Dev $x MED00001465
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240725

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...