-
Something wrong with this record ?
Exploring dual diagnosis in opioid agonist treatment patients: a registry-linkage study in Czechia and Norway
G. Rolová, S. Skurtveit, R. Gabrhelík, V. Mravčík, I. Odsbu
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NU20-09-00066
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
320360
Norges Forskningsråd
Cooperatio (HEAS)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2012-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2012
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2012
Free Medical Journals
from 2007
PubMed Central
from 2007
Europe PubMed Central
from 2007
ProQuest Central
from 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2007-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2009-04-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2007
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2012-12-01
- MeSH
- Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Mental Disorders * epidemiology drug therapy MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Opiate Substitution Treatment * statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Analgesics, Opioid therapeutic use MeSH
- Personality Disorders epidemiology MeSH
- Opioid-Related Disorders * epidemiology drug therapy MeSH
- Prevalence MeSH
- Registries * MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sex Factors MeSH
- Anxiety Disorders epidemiology drug therapy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Norway MeSH
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of co-occurring mental disorders (termed 'dual diagnosis') among patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is scarce. This study aimed (1) to estimate the prevalence and structure of dual diagnoses in two national cohorts of OAT patients and (2) to compare mental disorders between OAT patients and the general populations stratified on sex and standardized by age. METHODS: A registry-linkage study of OAT patients from Czechia (N = 4,280) and Norway (N = 11,389) during 2010-2019 was conducted. Data on mental disorders (F00-F99; ICD-10) recorded in nationwide health registers were linked to the individuals registered in OAT. Dual diagnoses were defined as any mental disorder excluding substance use disorders (SUDs, F10-F19; ICD-10). Sex-specific age-standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were calculated for 2019 to compare OAT patients and the general populations. RESULTS: The prevalence of dual diagnosis was 57.3% for Czechia and 78.3% for Norway. In Czechia, anxiety (31.1%) and personality disorders (25.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas anxiety (33.8%) and depression (20.8%) were the most prevalent in Norway. Large country-specific variations were observed, e.g., in ADHD (0.5% in Czechia, 15.8% in Norway), implying differences in screening and diagnostic practices. The SMR estimates for any mental disorders were 3.1 (females) and 5.1 (males) in Czechia and 5.6 (females) and 8.2 (males) in Norway. OAT females had a significantly higher prevalence of co-occurring mental disorders, whereas SMRs were higher in OAT males. In addition to opioid use disorder (OUD), other substance use disorders (SUDs) were frequently recorded in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate an excess of mental health problems in OAT patients compared to the general population of the same sex and age in both countries, requiring appropriate clinical attention. Country-specific differences may stem from variations in diagnostics and care, reporting to registers, OAT provision, or substance use patterns.
Department of Addictology General University Hospital Prague Prague Czechia
Department of Chronic Diseases Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway
Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research University of Oslo Oslo Norway
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013940
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905134113.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13722-024-00467-5 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38741162
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Rolová, Gabriela $u Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinářská 4, Prague, 128 00, Czechia. gabriela.rolova@lf1.cuni.cz $u Department of Addictology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia. gabriela.rolova@lf1.cuni.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000272387449
- 245 10
- $a Exploring dual diagnosis in opioid agonist treatment patients: a registry-linkage study in Czechia and Norway / $c G. Rolová, S. Skurtveit, R. Gabrhelík, V. Mravčík, I. Odsbu
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Knowledge of co-occurring mental disorders (termed 'dual diagnosis') among patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is scarce. This study aimed (1) to estimate the prevalence and structure of dual diagnoses in two national cohorts of OAT patients and (2) to compare mental disorders between OAT patients and the general populations stratified on sex and standardized by age. METHODS: A registry-linkage study of OAT patients from Czechia (N = 4,280) and Norway (N = 11,389) during 2010-2019 was conducted. Data on mental disorders (F00-F99; ICD-10) recorded in nationwide health registers were linked to the individuals registered in OAT. Dual diagnoses were defined as any mental disorder excluding substance use disorders (SUDs, F10-F19; ICD-10). Sex-specific age-standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were calculated for 2019 to compare OAT patients and the general populations. RESULTS: The prevalence of dual diagnosis was 57.3% for Czechia and 78.3% for Norway. In Czechia, anxiety (31.1%) and personality disorders (25.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas anxiety (33.8%) and depression (20.8%) were the most prevalent in Norway. Large country-specific variations were observed, e.g., in ADHD (0.5% in Czechia, 15.8% in Norway), implying differences in screening and diagnostic practices. The SMR estimates for any mental disorders were 3.1 (females) and 5.1 (males) in Czechia and 5.6 (females) and 8.2 (males) in Norway. OAT females had a significantly higher prevalence of co-occurring mental disorders, whereas SMRs were higher in OAT males. In addition to opioid use disorder (OUD), other substance use disorders (SUDs) were frequently recorded in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate an excess of mental health problems in OAT patients compared to the general population of the same sex and age in both countries, requiring appropriate clinical attention. Country-specific differences may stem from variations in diagnostics and care, reporting to registers, OAT provision, or substance use patterns.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a registrace $7 D012042
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a diagnóza dvojí (psychiatrie) $7 D017831
- 650 12
- $a poruchy spojené s užíváním opiátů $x epidemiologie $x farmakoterapie $7 D009293
- 650 _2
- $a prevalence $7 D015995
- 650 12
- $a opiátová substituční terapie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D058850
- 650 12
- $a duševní poruchy $x epidemiologie $x farmakoterapie $7 D001523
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a opioidní analgetika $x terapeutické užití $7 D000701
- 650 _2
- $a poruchy osobnosti $x epidemiologie $7 D010554
- 650 _2
- $a úzkostné poruchy $x epidemiologie $x farmakoterapie $7 D001008
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
- 651 _2
- $a Norsko $x epidemiologie $7 D009664
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Skurtveit, Svetlana $u Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway $u Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Gabrhelík, Roman $u Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinářská 4, Prague, 128 00, Czechia $u Department of Addictology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Mravčík, Viktor $u Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinářská 4, Prague, 128 00, Czechia $u Department of Addictology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Odsbu, Ingvild $u Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Apolinářská 4, Prague, 128 00, Czechia $u Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- 773 0_
- $w MED00172344 $t Addiction science & clinical practice $x 1940-0640 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2024), s. 37
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38741162 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905134107 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143631 $s 1225806
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 19 $c 1 $d 37 $e 20240514 $i 1940-0640 $m Addiction science & clinical practice $n Addict Sci Clin Pract $x MED00172344
- GRA __
- $a NU20-09-00066 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
- GRA __
- $a 320360 $p Norges Forskningsråd
- GRA __
- $a Cooperatio (HEAS) $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725