Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of contraction-type and noncontraction-type lymphatic vessels in lymphaticovenous anastomosis for cancer-related unilateral lower limb lymphedema: a retrospective cohort propensity-score-matched outcome analysis

M. Knoz, YM. Wang, SD. Luo, SC. Wu, WC. Lin, PY. Tsai, PC. Chien, CH. Hsieh, JC. Yang

. 2024 ; 110 (4) : 1913-1918. [pub] 20240401

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Contraction-type lymphatic vessels (LV) are considered suboptimal for lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). However, despite these pathological changes, their functionality and link to outcomes have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the impact on outcomes when contraction-type LVs were used for LVA compared to the noncontraction-type (normal + ectatic) counterpart for treating lower limb lymphedema. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-three patients with gynecologic cancer-related unilateral lower-limb lymphedema who underwent LVA as their primary treatment were enrolled in this study. The study group included 20 patients who used only contraction-type LVs. An additional 63 patients (control group) received noncontraction-type LVs only. Patients with a history of LVA, liposuction, or excisional therapy were excluded. Patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, functional parameters, and pre-LVA and post-LVA volume changes were recorded and matched using propensity scores. The primary endpoint was the volume change at 6/12 months after LVA. RESULTS: After matching, 20 patients were included in each group. All parameters were matched, except that the study group still had a significantly inferior indocyanine green (ICG)-positive ratio, lymph flow-positive ratio, and washout-positive ratios ( P <0.001, P =0.003, and P <0.001, respectively) when compared to the control group after matching. However, at 1-year follow-up, the postoperative percentage volume reduction was comparable between the groups ( P= 0.619). CONCLUSION: The use of contraction-type LVs for LVA is encouraged when no other LVs are available.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24014486
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240905134109.0
007      
ta
008      
240725s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001106 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38265436
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Knoz, Martin $u Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery, St Anne's University Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u College of Medicine, Chang Gung Universifwardty, Taoyuan $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
245    10
$a Comparison of contraction-type and noncontraction-type lymphatic vessels in lymphaticovenous anastomosis for cancer-related unilateral lower limb lymphedema: a retrospective cohort propensity-score-matched outcome analysis / $c M. Knoz, YM. Wang, SD. Luo, SC. Wu, WC. Lin, PY. Tsai, PC. Chien, CH. Hsieh, JC. Yang
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Contraction-type lymphatic vessels (LV) are considered suboptimal for lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). However, despite these pathological changes, their functionality and link to outcomes have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the impact on outcomes when contraction-type LVs were used for LVA compared to the noncontraction-type (normal + ectatic) counterpart for treating lower limb lymphedema. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-three patients with gynecologic cancer-related unilateral lower-limb lymphedema who underwent LVA as their primary treatment were enrolled in this study. The study group included 20 patients who used only contraction-type LVs. An additional 63 patients (control group) received noncontraction-type LVs only. Patients with a history of LVA, liposuction, or excisional therapy were excluded. Patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, functional parameters, and pre-LVA and post-LVA volume changes were recorded and matched using propensity scores. The primary endpoint was the volume change at 6/12 months after LVA. RESULTS: After matching, 20 patients were included in each group. All parameters were matched, except that the study group still had a significantly inferior indocyanine green (ICG)-positive ratio, lymph flow-positive ratio, and washout-positive ratios ( P <0.001, P =0.003, and P <0.001, respectively) when compared to the control group after matching. However, at 1-year follow-up, the postoperative percentage volume reduction was comparable between the groups ( P= 0.619). CONCLUSION: The use of contraction-type LVs for LVA is encouraged when no other LVs are available.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a anastomóza chirurgická $7 D000714
650    12
$a lymfedém $x chirurgie $x etiologie $7 D008209
650    12
$a lymfatické cévy $x chirurgie $7 D042601
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a tendenční skóre $7 D057216
650    12
$a dolní končetina $x chirurgie $7 D035002
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a nádory ženských pohlavních orgánů $x chirurgie $x komplikace $7 D005833
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Wang, Yu-Ming $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery $u Department of Radiation Oncology
700    1_
$a Luo, Sheng-Dean $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery $u Department of Otolaryngology
700    1_
$a Wu, Shao-Chun $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery $u Department of Anesthesiology
700    1_
$a Lin, Wei-Che $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
700    1_
$a Tsai, Pei-Yu $u College of Medicine, Chang Gung Universifwardty, Taoyuan $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
700    1_
$a Chien, Peng-Chen $u College of Medicine, Chang Gung Universifwardty, Taoyuan $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
700    1_
$a Hsieh, Ching-Hua $u College of Medicine, Chang Gung Universifwardty, Taoyuan $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
700    1_
$a Yang, Johnson Chia-Shen $u College of Medicine, Chang Gung Universifwardty, Taoyuan $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery $u Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xiamen Changgung Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China
773    0_
$w MED00166846 $t International journal of surgery $x 1743-9159 $g Roč. 110, č. 4 (2024), s. 1913-1918
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38265436 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240725 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240905134103 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2143940 $s 1226352
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 110 $c 4 $d 1913-1918 $e 20240401 $i 1743-9159 $m International journal of surgery $n Int J Surg $x MED00166846
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240725

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...