BACKGROUND: Contraction-type lymphatic vessels (LV) are considered suboptimal for lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). However, despite these pathological changes, their functionality and link to outcomes have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the impact on outcomes when contraction-type LVs were used for LVA compared to the noncontraction-type (normal + ectatic) counterpart for treating lower limb lymphedema. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-three patients with gynecologic cancer-related unilateral lower-limb lymphedema who underwent LVA as their primary treatment were enrolled in this study. The study group included 20 patients who used only contraction-type LVs. An additional 63 patients (control group) received noncontraction-type LVs only. Patients with a history of LVA, liposuction, or excisional therapy were excluded. Patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, functional parameters, and pre-LVA and post-LVA volume changes were recorded and matched using propensity scores. The primary endpoint was the volume change at 6/12 months after LVA. RESULTS: After matching, 20 patients were included in each group. All parameters were matched, except that the study group still had a significantly inferior indocyanine green (ICG)-positive ratio, lymph flow-positive ratio, and washout-positive ratios ( P <0.001, P =0.003, and P <0.001, respectively) when compared to the control group after matching. However, at 1-year follow-up, the postoperative percentage volume reduction was comparable between the groups ( P= 0.619). CONCLUSION: The use of contraction-type LVs for LVA is encouraged when no other LVs are available.

College of Medicine Chang Gung Universifwardty Taoyuan

Department of Anesthesiology

Department of Diagnostic Radiology Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan

Department of Otolaryngology

Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery St Anne's University Hospital Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Xiamen Changgung Hospital Xiamen Fujian People's Republic of China

Department of Radiation Oncology

Department of Surgery Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Zobrazit více v PubMed

DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, et al. . Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:500–515. PubMed

Kuroda K, Yamamoto Y, Yanagisawa M, et al. . Risk factors and a prediction model for lower limb lymphedema following lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Womens Health 2017;17:50. PubMed PMC

Yang JC, Huang LH, Wu SC, et al. . Lymphaticovenous anastomosis supermicrosurgery decreases oxidative stress and increases antioxidant capacity in the serum of lymphedema patients. J Clin Med 2021;10:1540. PubMed PMC

Yang JC, Hayashi A, Visconti G, et al. . Impact of retrograde anastomosis during supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis for cancer-related lower limb lymphedema: a retrospective cohort propensity-score-matched outcome analysis. Int J Surg 2022;104:106720. PubMed

Cha HG, Oh TM, Cho MJ, et al. . Changing the paradigm: lymphovenous anastomosis in advanced stage lower extremity lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;147:199–207. PubMed

Yang JC, Yen YH, Wu SC, et al. . Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis as an alternative treatment option for patients with lymphorrhea. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144:1214–1224. PubMed

Yang JC, Wu SC, Wang YM, et al. . Effect of lymphaticovenous anastomosis on muscle edema, limb, and subfascial volume in lower limb lymphedema: MRI studies. J Am Coll Surg 2022;235:227–239. PubMed PMC

Mihara M, Hara H, Hayashi Y, et al. . Pathological steps of cancer-related lymphedema: histological changes in the collecting lymphatic vessels after lymphadenectomy [published correction appears in PLoS One. 2013;8(5). doi: 10.1371/annotation/6fff4d28-3f99-44eb-82d6-ccd885a1ba11]. PLoS One 2012;7:e41126. PubMed PMC

Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Yoshimatsu H, et al. . Factors associated with lymphosclerosis: an analysis on 962 lymphatic vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:734–741. PubMed

Mathew G, Agha R, Albrecht J, et al. . STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery. Int J Surg 2021;96:106165. PubMed

Yang JC, Wu SC, Hayashi A, et al. . Selection of optimal functional lymphatic vessel cutoff size in supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis in lower extremity lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149:237–246. PubMed

Yang JC, Wu SC, Chiang MH, et al. . Intraoperative identification and definition of “functional” lymphatic collecting vessels for supermicrosurgical lymphatico-venous anastomosis in treating lymphedema patients. J Surg Oncol 2018;117:994–1000. PubMed

Yang JC, Wu SC, Lin WC, et al. . Reversing venous-lymphatic reflux following side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomosis with ligation of the proximal lymphatic vessel. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74:407–447. PubMed

Yamamoto T, Koshima I. Neo-valvuloplasty for lymphatic supermicrosurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:587–588. PubMed

Scallan JP, Zawieja SD, Castorena-Gonzalez JA, et al. . Lymphatic pumping: mechanics, mechanisms and malfunction. J Physiol 2016;594:5749–5768. PubMed PMC

Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011;46:399–424. PubMed PMC

Sainani KL. “Propensity scores: uses and limitations”. PM R 2012;4:693–697. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT06067880