-
Something wrong with this record ?
Not bitten by Ixodes ticks or bitten without symptoms, why still to worry
M. Andreychyn, M. Shkilna, O. Tokarskyy, O. Ivakhiv, Z. Smahlii, M. Korda
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article
Digital library NLK
Source
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
ProQuest Central
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-03-01 to 6 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1993
PubMed
39352092
DOI
10.21101/cejph.a8114
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Borrelia burgdorferi immunology isolation & purification MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay MeSH
- Ixodes * MeSH
- Tick Bites * MeSH
- Forestry MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lyme Disease * epidemiology MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Germany MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to analyse the risks of Lyme borreliosis (LB) among 1,070 forestry workers, the influence of responsible behaviour (use of repellents, skin self-inspection) on Borrelia screening result status, and the occurrence of immediate and mid-term symptoms after tick bites and LB positive serological screening test. METHODS: The questionnaire was conducted as well as blood tests for LB disease by one-stage serological screening procedure using ELISA for specific B. burgdorferi IgM and IgG antibodies (EuroImmun AG company, Germany). RESULTS: While 39.6% of foresters were LB positive among bitten foresters, as many as 27.0% were LB positive among those, who did not recall any tick attacks at all. Individuals with known history of tick bites had significantly higher odds (1.770×) of being LB positive (p < 0.05), while the use of repellents or skin self-inspection after visiting woods had no influence on LB results. The odds of skin discolouration after tick bites was significantly lower (0.682×) in case of LB positive test compared to LB negative test (p < 0.05), which can be explained by the fact that foresters could be unaware about erythema migrans appearance and timing, considering tick bite and developed later rash as completely separate events. Moreover, 69.1% of the bitten foresters with LB positive result developed no secondary symptoms (excluding those related to the skin), and the most frequent clinical symptoms were arthralgia (24.9%), followed by myalgia (7.6%), headache (5.7%), and damage to facial nerve (2.7%), which are non-specific and can be present in other illnesses. CONCLUSION: Therefore, the recommendations proposed would be the regular laboratory testing for LB of sensitive and at-risk population, who visits endemic woody areas, irrespective of all other factors involved.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24017571
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250507135838.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241004s2024 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21101/cejph.a8114 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39352092
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Andreychyn, Mykhaylo $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Dermatology and Venereology, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
- 245 10
- $a Not bitten by Ixodes ticks or bitten without symptoms, why still to worry / $c M. Andreychyn, M. Shkilna, O. Tokarskyy, O. Ivakhiv, Z. Smahlii, M. Korda
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to analyse the risks of Lyme borreliosis (LB) among 1,070 forestry workers, the influence of responsible behaviour (use of repellents, skin self-inspection) on Borrelia screening result status, and the occurrence of immediate and mid-term symptoms after tick bites and LB positive serological screening test. METHODS: The questionnaire was conducted as well as blood tests for LB disease by one-stage serological screening procedure using ELISA for specific B. burgdorferi IgM and IgG antibodies (EuroImmun AG company, Germany). RESULTS: While 39.6% of foresters were LB positive among bitten foresters, as many as 27.0% were LB positive among those, who did not recall any tick attacks at all. Individuals with known history of tick bites had significantly higher odds (1.770×) of being LB positive (p < 0.05), while the use of repellents or skin self-inspection after visiting woods had no influence on LB results. The odds of skin discolouration after tick bites was significantly lower (0.682×) in case of LB positive test compared to LB negative test (p < 0.05), which can be explained by the fact that foresters could be unaware about erythema migrans appearance and timing, considering tick bite and developed later rash as completely separate events. Moreover, 69.1% of the bitten foresters with LB positive result developed no secondary symptoms (excluding those related to the skin), and the most frequent clinical symptoms were arthralgia (24.9%), followed by myalgia (7.6%), headache (5.7%), and damage to facial nerve (2.7%), which are non-specific and can be present in other illnesses. CONCLUSION: Therefore, the recommendations proposed would be the regular laboratory testing for LB of sensitive and at-risk population, who visits endemic woody areas, irrespective of all other factors involved.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a kousnutí klíštětem $7 D064927
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a klíště $7 D018884
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a lymeská nemoc $x epidemiologie $7 D008193
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a lesnictví $7 D016468
- 650 _2
- $a ELISA $7 D004797
- 650 _2
- $a Borrelia burgdorferi $x imunologie $x izolace a purifikace $7 D025065
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 651 _2
- $a Německo $x epidemiologie $7 D005858
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Shkilna, Maria $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Dermatology and Venereology, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
- 700 1_
- $a Tokarskyy, Oleksandr $u Department of Medical Biochemistry, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
- 700 1_
- $a Ivakhiv, Oleh $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Dermatology and Venereology, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
- 700 1_
- $a Smahlii, Zoriana $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Dermatology and Venereology, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
- 700 1_
- $a Korda, Mykhaylo $u Department of Medical Biochemistry, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 32, č. 3 (2024), s. 173-177
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39352092 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241004 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250507135835 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2316491 $s 1229521
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 32 $c 3 $d 173-177 $e - $i 1210-7778 $m Central European journal of public health $n Cent Eur J Public Health $x MED00001083
- LZP __
- $b NLK124 $a Pubmed-20241004