• Something wrong with this record ?

Preservation of orbit in tumor invasion through the periorbita in sinonasal malignancy

S. Novak, Z. Balatkova, A. Fikova, M. Grega, D. Kalfert, J. Plzak

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

OBJECTIVE: One of the possible risks of sinonasal malignancy is its possible spread in the orbit. However, there is no clear consensus among the different departments as to whether it is necessary to exenterate the orbit in limited tumorous infiltration of periorbital fat. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate that periorbital infiltration and periorbital fat invasion without involvement of deeper orbital tissues are not the indication of orbital exenteration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed over a 17-year period of patients undergoing surgical treatment for sinonasal malignancy with histologically verified periorbital infiltration or deeper invasion into the orbit. A total of 32 patients were included in the study. For each group, the following data were analysed: sex, age, preoperative imaging studies, histological findings, site of origin, stage, surgical reconstruction, oncological treatment, survival, cause of death, number of recurrences in the orbit and functional status of preserved eyes. RESULTS: Based on our criteria for orbital exenteration, orbital preservation was feasible in 18 patients. Orbital exenteration was performed in 14 patients with deeper tumor infiltration. There was a statistically insignificant difference in survival between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 44% for the orbital preservation group (only 2 patients died from local tumor recurrence) and 34% for the orbital exenteration group. The groups did not differ in other observed factors other than the extent of orbital infiltration. In 11 (61.1%) patients, vision was without significant change after radiation therapy. In 2 (11.1%) patients, visual function was impaired due to diplopia. 5 (27.8%) patients had severely impaired vision due to optic nerve atrophy after radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a relatively high survival rate in the group of patients with orbital preservation with a high chance of vision preservation, which justifies our approach to orbital preservation even in some tumors with periorbital infiltration.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24018799
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024111318.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00405-024-08757-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38914815
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Novak, Stepan $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic. Stepan.novak@fnmotol.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000211740878 $7 xx0228814
245    10
$a Preservation of orbit in tumor invasion through the periorbita in sinonasal malignancy / $c S. Novak, Z. Balatkova, A. Fikova, M. Grega, D. Kalfert, J. Plzak
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: One of the possible risks of sinonasal malignancy is its possible spread in the orbit. However, there is no clear consensus among the different departments as to whether it is necessary to exenterate the orbit in limited tumorous infiltration of periorbital fat. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate that periorbital infiltration and periorbital fat invasion without involvement of deeper orbital tissues are not the indication of orbital exenteration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed over a 17-year period of patients undergoing surgical treatment for sinonasal malignancy with histologically verified periorbital infiltration or deeper invasion into the orbit. A total of 32 patients were included in the study. For each group, the following data were analysed: sex, age, preoperative imaging studies, histological findings, site of origin, stage, surgical reconstruction, oncological treatment, survival, cause of death, number of recurrences in the orbit and functional status of preserved eyes. RESULTS: Based on our criteria for orbital exenteration, orbital preservation was feasible in 18 patients. Orbital exenteration was performed in 14 patients with deeper tumor infiltration. There was a statistically insignificant difference in survival between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 44% for the orbital preservation group (only 2 patients died from local tumor recurrence) and 34% for the orbital exenteration group. The groups did not differ in other observed factors other than the extent of orbital infiltration. In 11 (61.1%) patients, vision was without significant change after radiation therapy. In 2 (11.1%) patients, visual function was impaired due to diplopia. 5 (27.8%) patients had severely impaired vision due to optic nerve atrophy after radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a relatively high survival rate in the group of patients with orbital preservation with a high chance of vision preservation, which justifies our approach to orbital preservation even in some tumors with periorbital infiltration.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a nádory vedlejších dutin nosních $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D010255
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a nádory orbity $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D009918
650    _2
$a orbita $x patologie $7 D009915
650    _2
$a eviscerace orbity $7 D017233
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a léčba šetřící orgány $x metody $7 D059351
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Balatkova, Zuzana $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fikova, Alzbeta $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Grega, Marek $u Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kalfert, David $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Plzak, Jan $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, Prague, 150 06, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00009617 $t European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery $x 1434-4726 $g Roč. 281, č. 10 (2024), s. 5303-5310
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38914815 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024111312 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2201577 $s 1230772
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 281 $c 10 $d 5303-5310 $e 20240624 $i 1434-4726 $m European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery $n Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol $x MED00009617
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...