• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Sentinel lymph node pathological ultrastaging: Final outcome of the Sentix prospective international study in patients with early-stage cervical cancer

R. Kocian, C. Kohler, S. Bajsova, J. Jarkovsky, I. Zapardiel, G. Di Martino, L. van Lonkhuijzen, B. Sehnal, OA. Sanchez, B. Gil-Ibanez, F. Martinelli, J. Presl, L. Minar, R. Pilka, P. Kascak, P. Havelka, M. Michal, T. van Gorp, K. Nemejcova, P....

. 2024 ; 188 (-) : 83-89. [pub] 20240627

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24019130

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome of SLN staging in the SENTIX international prospective trial of SLN biopsy in patients with cervical cancer with an intensive ultrastaging protocol and central quality control and to evaluate how the intensity of pathological assessment correlates with metastatic detection rate in SLNs. METHODS: Eligible were patients with stages T1a1/LVSI+ to T1b2 (<4 cm, ≤2 cm for fertility sparing), common tumor types, no suspicious lymph nodes on imaging, and bilateral SLN detection. SLNs were examined intraoperatively and processed by an intensive protocol for ultrastaging (paraffin blocks sectioned completely in 150-μm intervals/levels). SLNs from each site were submitted for central quality control. RESULTS: In the SENTIX SLN study, 647 out of 733 enrolled patients underwent SLN ultrastaging, identifying 12.5% (81/647) with node positive, N1 cases. Intraoperative detection revealed metastases in 56.8% (46/81) of these cases, categorized into macrometastases (83.7%), micrometastases (26.3%), and isolated tumor cells (9.1%). Ultrastaging identified additional metastatic involvement in 43.2% (35/81) of patients, with detailed sectioning revealing metastases (MAC/MIC) at first level in 20 cases (24.7%), at levels 2-4 in 9 cases (11.1%), and at level ≥5 in 6 cases (7.4%). CONCLUSION: SLN ultrastaging detects additional 43% of N1 (MAC/MIC) in patients with negative LNs by imaging and intraoperative pathological assessment. The detection rate of positive SLN correlates with the intensity (number of levels) of ultrastaging. Examination of four levels from paraffin blocks, which detects >90% of patients with N1, is a reasonable compromise for an international standard for ultrastaging. STUDY REGISTRATION: NCT02494063 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Center for Gynecologic Oncology Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam Netherlands

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics University Hospital Pilsen Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Gynecologic Oncology University Hospital of the Canary Islands Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain

Department of Gynecological Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano Italy

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics University Hospital Leuven Leuven Cancer Institute Leuven Belgium

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital Ceske Budejovice JSC Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty Hospital Trencin Trencin Slovakia

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacky University University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology KNTB a s Zlin Czech Republic

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology La Paz University Hospital Madrid Spain

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Bulovka 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic

Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology Asklepios Clinic Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Gynecologic Oncology Center Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Neonatology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Gynecologic Oncology Surgical Division Humanitas San Pio 10 Milan 20159 Italy

Gynecology Unit IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori 20900 Monza Italy

Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Institute of Pathology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Unit of Gynecological Oncology Institute Clinic of Gynecology Obstetrics and Neonatology Hospital Clinic of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019130
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024111715.0
007      
ta
008      
241015e20240627xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.015 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38941963
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kocian, Roman $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: Roman.Kocian@vfn.cz
245    10
$a Sentinel lymph node pathological ultrastaging: Final outcome of the Sentix prospective international study in patients with early-stage cervical cancer / $c R. Kocian, C. Kohler, S. Bajsova, J. Jarkovsky, I. Zapardiel, G. Di Martino, L. van Lonkhuijzen, B. Sehnal, OA. Sanchez, B. Gil-Ibanez, F. Martinelli, J. Presl, L. Minar, R. Pilka, P. Kascak, P. Havelka, M. Michal, T. van Gorp, K. Nemejcova, P. Dundr, D. Cibula
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome of SLN staging in the SENTIX international prospective trial of SLN biopsy in patients with cervical cancer with an intensive ultrastaging protocol and central quality control and to evaluate how the intensity of pathological assessment correlates with metastatic detection rate in SLNs. METHODS: Eligible were patients with stages T1a1/LVSI+ to T1b2 (<4 cm, ≤2 cm for fertility sparing), common tumor types, no suspicious lymph nodes on imaging, and bilateral SLN detection. SLNs were examined intraoperatively and processed by an intensive protocol for ultrastaging (paraffin blocks sectioned completely in 150-μm intervals/levels). SLNs from each site were submitted for central quality control. RESULTS: In the SENTIX SLN study, 647 out of 733 enrolled patients underwent SLN ultrastaging, identifying 12.5% (81/647) with node positive, N1 cases. Intraoperative detection revealed metastases in 56.8% (46/81) of these cases, categorized into macrometastases (83.7%), micrometastases (26.3%), and isolated tumor cells (9.1%). Ultrastaging identified additional metastatic involvement in 43.2% (35/81) of patients, with detailed sectioning revealing metastases (MAC/MIC) at first level in 20 cases (24.7%), at levels 2-4 in 9 cases (11.1%), and at level ≥5 in 6 cases (7.4%). CONCLUSION: SLN ultrastaging detects additional 43% of N1 (MAC/MIC) in patients with negative LNs by imaging and intraoperative pathological assessment. The detection rate of positive SLN correlates with the intensity (number of levels) of ultrastaging. Examination of four levels from paraffin blocks, which detects >90% of patients with N1, is a reasonable compromise for an international standard for ultrastaging. STUDY REGISTRATION: NCT02494063 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a nádory děložního čípku $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D002583
650    12
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    12
$a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $x metody $7 D021701
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a sentinelová uzlina $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D000071036
650    12
$a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Kohler, Christhardt $u Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Bajsova, Sylva $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jarkovsky, Jiri $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zapardiel, Ignacio $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Di Martino, Giampaolo $u Gynecologic Oncology Surgical Division, Humanitas San Pio X, Milan, 20159, Italy; Gynecology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900, Monza, Italy
700    1_
$a van Lonkhuijzen, Luc $u Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
700    1_
$a Sehnal, Borek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bulovka, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sanchez, Octavio Arencibia $u Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
700    1_
$a Gil-Ibanez, Blanca $u Unit of Gynecological Oncology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology (ICGON), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Martinelli, Fabio $u Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy; Gynecologic Oncology Surgical Division, Humanitas San Pio X, Milan, 20159, Italy
700    1_
$a Presl, Jiri $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Minar, Lubos $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pilka, Radovan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kascak, Peter $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty Hospital Trencin, Trencin, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Havelka, Pavel $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KNTB a.s, Zlin, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Michal, Martin $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Ceske Budejovice, JSC, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a van Gorp, Toon $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Nemejcova, Kristyna $u Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dundr, Pavel $u Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cibula, David $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00001958 $t Gynecologic oncology $x 1095-6859 $g Roč. 188 (20240627), s. 83-89
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38941963 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024111709 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2201764 $s 1231103
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 188 $c - $d 83-89 $e 20240627 $i 1095-6859 $m Gynecologic oncology $n Gynecol Oncol $x MED00001958
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...