• Something wrong with this record ?

Pressure, Flow, and Glottal Area Waveform Profile Changes During Phonation Using the Acapella Choice Device

PA. Andrade, M. Frič, B. Saccente-Kennedy, V. Hruška

. 2024 ; 38 (5) : 1248.e23-1248.e33. [pub] 20220310

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: Vibratory positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices are now commonly used as a resource for voice therapy. PEP devices promote improved vocal economy with the added benefit of producing a massage effect in the vocal tract. Although the benefits of PEP devices for voice have already been demonstrated, their impact on the vocal source is still not very clear. This study assesses the impact of phonation into the Acapella Choice (a type of PEP device) on the voice. METHODS: Three normophonic subjects underwent high-speed videoendoscopy assessment while pressure, flow and electroglottographic data was collected. RESULTS: Phonation into the Acapella device produces large changes in the pressure and flow profiles consequently affecting the voice source. In specific, when intraoral pressure increases as a consequence of the downward movement of the rocker arm in the Acapella device (reduction of the airflow outlet), phonation is hindered, demonstrated by the lower amplitude of vibration of the vocal folds and weaker modulation of the pressure and flow values by the glottal cycle. When the rocker arm in the Acapella device opens (increasing the airflow outlet), the opposite trend is observed where vocal fold vibration is aided and the modulation of pressure and flow by the vocal cycle increases. Based on the pressure and flow signals, we can assume that the impedance of the vocal tract alternates between two dominant regimes: increased inertive reactance (aided vibration) and increased resistance (hindered vibration). CONCLUSIONS: PEP devices, such as the Acapella device, are efficient in modulating the pressure and flow profiles in the vocal tract leading to the alternation of glottal vibration from aided to hindered. These changes in the glottal vibration can be considered an additional consequence of the massage effect caused by the Acapella device.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019226
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024111431.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.02.010 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35282939
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Andrade, Pedro Amarante $u Musical Acoustics Research Centre, Music and Dance Faculty, Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, Czechia. Electronic address: pedro.andrade@hamu.cz
245    10
$a Pressure, Flow, and Glottal Area Waveform Profile Changes During Phonation Using the Acapella Choice Device / $c PA. Andrade, M. Frič, B. Saccente-Kennedy, V. Hruška
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Vibratory positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices are now commonly used as a resource for voice therapy. PEP devices promote improved vocal economy with the added benefit of producing a massage effect in the vocal tract. Although the benefits of PEP devices for voice have already been demonstrated, their impact on the vocal source is still not very clear. This study assesses the impact of phonation into the Acapella Choice (a type of PEP device) on the voice. METHODS: Three normophonic subjects underwent high-speed videoendoscopy assessment while pressure, flow and electroglottographic data was collected. RESULTS: Phonation into the Acapella device produces large changes in the pressure and flow profiles consequently affecting the voice source. In specific, when intraoral pressure increases as a consequence of the downward movement of the rocker arm in the Acapella device (reduction of the airflow outlet), phonation is hindered, demonstrated by the lower amplitude of vibration of the vocal folds and weaker modulation of the pressure and flow values by the glottal cycle. When the rocker arm in the Acapella device opens (increasing the airflow outlet), the opposite trend is observed where vocal fold vibration is aided and the modulation of pressure and flow by the vocal cycle increases. Based on the pressure and flow signals, we can assume that the impedance of the vocal tract alternates between two dominant regimes: increased inertive reactance (aided vibration) and increased resistance (hindered vibration). CONCLUSIONS: PEP devices, such as the Acapella device, are efficient in modulating the pressure and flow profiles in the vocal tract leading to the alternation of glottal vibration from aided to hindered. These changes in the glottal vibration can be considered an additional consequence of the massage effect caused by the Acapella device.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a fonace $7 D010699
650    12
$a glottis $x fyziologie $7 D005931
650    12
$a tlak $7 D011312
650    12
$a vibrace $7 D014732
650    12
$a kvalita hlasu $7 D014833
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a hlasový trénink $7 D014834
650    12
$a audiovizuální záznam $7 D014741
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a laryngoskopie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D007828
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    _2
$a elektrodiagnostika $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D004568
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a hlasové řasy $x fyziologie $7 D014827
650    _2
$a ventilace umělá s výdechovým přetlakem $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D011175
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Frič, Marek $u Musical Acoustics Research Centre, Music and Dance Faculty, Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Saccente-Kennedy, Brian $u University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Hruška, Viktor $u Musical Acoustics Research Centre, Music and Dance Faculty, Academy of Performing Arts in Prague, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00180382 $t Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation $x 1873-4588 $g Roč. 38, č. 5 (2024), s. 1248.e23-1248.e33
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35282939 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024111424 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2201837 $s 1231199
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 38 $c 5 $d 1248.e23-1248.e33 $e 20220310 $i 1873-4588 $m Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation $n J Voice $x MED00180382
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...