-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Medical occupational check-ups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the European Union
M. Fošum, L. Štěpánek, K. Ivanová, M. Nakládalová
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
RVO_61989592
Palacký University Fund
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1996 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1996-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2006-01-02
Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
od 1991-01-01
PubMed
38894505
DOI
10.1093/eurpub/ckae103
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * prevence a kontrola epidemiologie MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- Evropská unie * MeSH
- fyzikální vyšetření MeSH
- hygiena práce * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pandemie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 * MeSH
- služby zdravotní péče o pracující MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Given the enormous scale of the COVID-19 pandemic affecting the healthcare sector, limited human resource capacity, and efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19, occupational health protection could not escape changes. The aim was to identify and compare the regulations regarding the provision of medical occupational check-ups (MOCs) during the pandemic in all European Union member states (EU MS). The study employed the Delphi method, involving experts from EU MS to assess MOC regulations between January 2020 and May 2021. Experts were queried regarding the existence and specifics of MOC regulations, particularly for entrance and periodic MOCs at hazardous and non-hazardous workplaces. Out of the 27 EU MS surveyed, 13 EU MS did not regulate MOCs, while 14 EU MS (51.6%) regulated the provision of MOCs. The regulations were changes in the way MOCs were provided, modifications (postponement in time, alternative provision, e.g. using telemedicine or online connection, or replacing the medical certificate of fitness to work based on the MOC with a declaration by the worker), or interruption without compensation, even for hazardous works. The regulations were in effect for different lengths of time and varied in some countries during the study period. The cumulative duration of MOC interruptions in all EU MS during the study period was 137 months (7.5% of the cumulative study period of 1836 months). Given the different approaches to the provision of MOCs in EU MS, it has proved appropriate to develop an optimal unified framework plan for future similar situations.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019518
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110758.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/eurpub/ckae103 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38894505
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Fošum, Matyáš $u Department of Occupational Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Department of Public Health Protection, Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Medical occupational check-ups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the European Union / $c M. Fošum, L. Štěpánek, K. Ivanová, M. Nakládalová
- 520 9_
- $a Given the enormous scale of the COVID-19 pandemic affecting the healthcare sector, limited human resource capacity, and efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19, occupational health protection could not escape changes. The aim was to identify and compare the regulations regarding the provision of medical occupational check-ups (MOCs) during the pandemic in all European Union member states (EU MS). The study employed the Delphi method, involving experts from EU MS to assess MOC regulations between January 2020 and May 2021. Experts were queried regarding the existence and specifics of MOC regulations, particularly for entrance and periodic MOCs at hazardous and non-hazardous workplaces. Out of the 27 EU MS surveyed, 13 EU MS did not regulate MOCs, while 14 EU MS (51.6%) regulated the provision of MOCs. The regulations were changes in the way MOCs were provided, modifications (postponement in time, alternative provision, e.g. using telemedicine or online connection, or replacing the medical certificate of fitness to work based on the MOC with a declaration by the worker), or interruption without compensation, even for hazardous works. The regulations were in effect for different lengths of time and varied in some countries during the study period. The cumulative duration of MOC interruptions in all EU MS during the study period was 137 months (7.5% of the cumulative study period of 1836 months). Given the different approaches to the provision of MOCs in EU MS, it has proved appropriate to develop an optimal unified framework plan for future similar situations.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a COVID-19 $x prevence a kontrola $x epidemiologie $7 D000086382
- 650 12
- $a Evropská unie $7 D005062
- 650 12
- $a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
- 650 12
- $a hygiena práce $7 D016272
- 650 _2
- $a pandemie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D058873
- 650 _2
- $a delfská metoda $7 D003697
- 650 _2
- $a služby zdravotní péče o pracující $7 D009786
- 650 _2
- $a fyzikální vyšetření $7 D010808
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Štěpánek, Ladislav $u Department of Occupational Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000272611412
- 700 1_
- $a Ivanová, Kateřina $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nakládalová, Marie $u Department of Occupational Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012099 $t European journal of public health $x 1464-360X $g Roč. 34, č. 4 (2024), s. 753-759
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38894505 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110752 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202006 $s 1231491
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 34 $c 4 $d 753-759 $e 20240801 $i 1464-360X $m European journal of public health $n Eur J Public Health $x MED00012099
- GRA __
- $a RVO_61989592 $p Palacký University Fund
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015