-
Something wrong with this record ?
Artrodéza distálního interfalangeálního kloubu prstu ruky za použití nitrodřeňového implantátu
[Arthrodesis of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint of the Finger Using an Intramedullary Implant]
P. Barabas, R. Pavličný
Language Czech Country Czech Republic
Document type English Abstract, Journal Article
PubMed
39496194
DOI
10.55095/achot2024/047
- MeSH
- Arthrodesis * methods instrumentation MeSH
- Finger Joint * surgery MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Osteoarthritis * surgery MeSH
- Radiography MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- English Abstract MeSH
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the joints of the hand is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in the elderly population. It is a complex, degenerative disease affecting all components of the joint. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative therapy fails. The ultimate solution is arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint. Various methods of arthrodesis have been described, ranging from the use of K-wires or compression screw to different types of intra-articular (intramedullary) implants. The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint of the fingers using intramedullary implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2011, arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint using an intramedullary implant has been performed at our department 97 times in total, in 59 patients. 9 patients (15 cases of arthrodesis) were excluded from the study group due to their failure to complete the questionnaire, 1 female patient died. In the final group, 82 cases of arthrodesis in 49 patients (47 women, 2 men) were evaluated. In 72% of cases, the surgery was performed on the dominant hand. The mean age at the time of surgery was 58 years (median 59 years). The patients were indicated for surgery after the failure of all conservative treatment options. In addition to radiographs, also the hand function and pain were assessed based on the preand postoperative DASH score questionnaires. RESULTS: The surgical outcomes for all implants are satisfactory. In all 82 patients, the surgical wounds healed per primam. In one case, implant extraction was performed due to infection. Another complication was an unhealed fusion and formation of a non-union with minimum pathological mobility (the patient is satisfied with the outcome). In three patients, a fracture at the base of the distal phalanx was observed on postoperative radiographs, which fully healed within 3 months after surgery. The mean DASH score decreased from 41.95 preoperatively to 14.93 postoperatively. The mean time to healing of the arthrodesis observed on radiographs was 9.1 weeks. DISCUSSION: Currently, there are many different types of arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint of the hand. Each method has its pros and cons. Arthrodesis using an intramedullary implant has the advantages of the older methods while minimizing postoperative complications. Our results are comparable to those reported in the foreign literature. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evaluated outcomes, arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint using an intramedullary implant can be considered valid. It definitely deserves to be included in the portfolio of surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the DIP joints of the hand. According to our observation, the differences between various types of implants are minimal and their outcomes are comparable to those reported in foreign publications. The pain relief, restored finger function and fusion rate are comparable to, if not better than, those achieved by the older surgical methods. The advantage of this method is mainly easier implantation, fewer complications, and the possibility of implantation without the use of an X-ray image intensifier, which ultimately reduces the cost of surgery. The main disadvantage is the higher purchase price of the implant. KEY WORDS: osteoarthritis, distal interphalangeal joint, arthrodesis.
Arthrodesis of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint of the Finger Using an Intramedullary Implant
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24022778
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250218134133.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241205s2024 xr a f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.55095/ACHOT2024/047 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39496194
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Barabas, P $u Ortopedické oddělení, Karvinská hornická nemocnice a.s., Karviná
- 245 10
- $a Artrodéza distálního interfalangeálního kloubu prstu ruky za použití nitrodřeňového implantátu / $c P. Barabas, R. Pavličný
- 246 31
- $a [Arthrodesis of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint of the Finger Using an Intramedullary Implant]
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the joints of the hand is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in the elderly population. It is a complex, degenerative disease affecting all components of the joint. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative therapy fails. The ultimate solution is arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint. Various methods of arthrodesis have been described, ranging from the use of K-wires or compression screw to different types of intra-articular (intramedullary) implants. The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint of the fingers using intramedullary implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2011, arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint using an intramedullary implant has been performed at our department 97 times in total, in 59 patients. 9 patients (15 cases of arthrodesis) were excluded from the study group due to their failure to complete the questionnaire, 1 female patient died. In the final group, 82 cases of arthrodesis in 49 patients (47 women, 2 men) were evaluated. In 72% of cases, the surgery was performed on the dominant hand. The mean age at the time of surgery was 58 years (median 59 years). The patients were indicated for surgery after the failure of all conservative treatment options. In addition to radiographs, also the hand function and pain were assessed based on the preand postoperative DASH score questionnaires. RESULTS: The surgical outcomes for all implants are satisfactory. In all 82 patients, the surgical wounds healed per primam. In one case, implant extraction was performed due to infection. Another complication was an unhealed fusion and formation of a non-union with minimum pathological mobility (the patient is satisfied with the outcome). In three patients, a fracture at the base of the distal phalanx was observed on postoperative radiographs, which fully healed within 3 months after surgery. The mean DASH score decreased from 41.95 preoperatively to 14.93 postoperatively. The mean time to healing of the arthrodesis observed on radiographs was 9.1 weeks. DISCUSSION: Currently, there are many different types of arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint of the hand. Each method has its pros and cons. Arthrodesis using an intramedullary implant has the advantages of the older methods while minimizing postoperative complications. Our results are comparable to those reported in the foreign literature. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evaluated outcomes, arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint using an intramedullary implant can be considered valid. It definitely deserves to be included in the portfolio of surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the DIP joints of the hand. According to our observation, the differences between various types of implants are minimal and their outcomes are comparable to those reported in foreign publications. The pain relief, restored finger function and fusion rate are comparable to, if not better than, those achieved by the older surgical methods. The advantage of this method is mainly easier implantation, fewer complications, and the possibility of implantation without the use of an X-ray image intensifier, which ultimately reduces the cost of surgery. The main disadvantage is the higher purchase price of the implant. KEY WORDS: osteoarthritis, distal interphalangeal joint, arthrodesis.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a artrodéza $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D001174
- 650 12
- $a kloub prstu ruky $x chirurgie $7 D005384
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a osteoartróza $x chirurgie $7 D010003
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a radiografie $7 D011859
- 655 _2
- $a anglický abstrakt $7 D004740
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Pavličný, Radek $u Ortopedické oddělení, Karvinská hornická nemocnice a.s., Karviná $7 xx0140776
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 91, č. 5 (2024), s. 282-288
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39496194 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241205 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250218134130 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2270197 $s 1234783
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 91 $c 5 $d 282-288 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $n Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20241205