• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes

S. Knoedler, L. Knoedler, M. Kauke-Navarro, M. Alfertshofer, D. Obed, N. Broer, BS. Kim, S. Könneker, AC. Panayi, G. Hundeshagen, U. Kneser, B. Pomahac, V. Haug

. 2024 ; 95 (-) : 300-318. [pub] 20240612

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu systematický přehled, časopisecké články, metaanalýza, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25000339

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation ranks among the most popular plastic surgery procedures. Yet, reports on post-operative patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction remain conflicting. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched for eligible studies that reported pre-and/or post-operative Breast-QTM augmentation scores for patient QoL (psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being) and/or satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies (53 patient cohorts and 18,322 patients) were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pairwise meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in patient-reported psychosocial (MD: +38.10) and sexual well-being (MD: +40.20) as well as satisfaction with breast (MD: +47.88) (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved slightly after breast augmentation (MD: +6.97; p = 0.42). The single-arm meta-analysis yielded comparable results, with Breast-QTM scores in psychosocial and sexual well-being as well as satisfaction with breast increasing from 37.2, 31.1, and 26.3 to 75.0, 70.6, and 72.7, respectively (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved by 8.1 (75.8 pre-operatively to 83.9 post-operatively; p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses highlighted higher QoL and satisfaction following breast augmentation for purely esthetic purposes and alloplastic mammaplasty. Although patient-reported physical and sexual well-being increased in the long term, psychosocial well-being was the highest in the short term. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with breast, psychosocial, and sexual well-being increased significantly after breast augmentation. In contrast, patient-reported physical well-being yielded ambivalent results, varying by mammaplasty technique and post-operative follow-up time. Plastic surgeons should be sensitized about our findings to refine eligibility criteria and gain a deeper understanding of the patients' perceived surgical experience. PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: CRD42023409605.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25000339
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250107151814.0
007      
ta
008      
250107e20240612ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.06.016 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38945110
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Knoedler, Samuel $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
245    10
$a Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes / $c S. Knoedler, L. Knoedler, M. Kauke-Navarro, M. Alfertshofer, D. Obed, N. Broer, BS. Kim, S. Könneker, AC. Panayi, G. Hundeshagen, U. Kneser, B. Pomahac, V. Haug
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation ranks among the most popular plastic surgery procedures. Yet, reports on post-operative patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction remain conflicting. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched for eligible studies that reported pre-and/or post-operative Breast-QTM augmentation scores for patient QoL (psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being) and/or satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies (53 patient cohorts and 18,322 patients) were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pairwise meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in patient-reported psychosocial (MD: +38.10) and sexual well-being (MD: +40.20) as well as satisfaction with breast (MD: +47.88) (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved slightly after breast augmentation (MD: +6.97; p = 0.42). The single-arm meta-analysis yielded comparable results, with Breast-QTM scores in psychosocial and sexual well-being as well as satisfaction with breast increasing from 37.2, 31.1, and 26.3 to 75.0, 70.6, and 72.7, respectively (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved by 8.1 (75.8 pre-operatively to 83.9 post-operatively; p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses highlighted higher QoL and satisfaction following breast augmentation for purely esthetic purposes and alloplastic mammaplasty. Although patient-reported physical and sexual well-being increased in the long term, psychosocial well-being was the highest in the short term. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with breast, psychosocial, and sexual well-being increased significantly after breast augmentation. In contrast, patient-reported physical well-being yielded ambivalent results, varying by mammaplasty technique and post-operative follow-up time. Plastic surgeons should be sensitized about our findings to refine eligibility criteria and gain a deeper understanding of the patients' perceived surgical experience. PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: CRD42023409605.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
650    12
$a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
650    12
$a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a mamoplastika $x psychologie $x metody $7 D016462
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Knoedler, Leonard $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
700    1_
$a Kauke-Navarro, Martin $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
700    1_
$a Alfertshofer, Michael $u Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Obed, Doha $u Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
700    1_
$a Broer, Niclas $u Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Bogenhausen Academic Teaching Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Kim, Bong-Sung $u Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Könneker, Sören $u Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Panayi, Adriana C $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
700    1_
$a Hundeshagen, Gabriel $u Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
700    1_
$a Kneser, Ulrich $u Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
700    1_
$a Pomahač, Bohdan, $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA $d 1971- $7 xx0117402
700    1_
$a Haug, Valentin $u Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Electronic address: vfm.haug@gmail.com
773    0_
$w MED00008968 $t Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS $x 1878-0539 $g Roč. 95 (20240612), s. 300-318
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38945110 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250107151810 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2245118 $s 1236339
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 95 $c - $d 300-318 $e 20240612 $i 1878-0539 $m Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS $n J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg $x MED00008968
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250107

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...