-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes
S. Knoedler, L. Knoedler, M. Kauke-Navarro, M. Alfertshofer, D. Obed, N. Broer, BS. Kim, S. Könneker, AC. Panayi, G. Hundeshagen, U. Kneser, B. Pomahac, V. Haug
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu systematický přehled, časopisecké články, metaanalýza, přehledy
- MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem * MeSH
- kvalita života * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mamoplastika * psychologie metody MeSH
- spokojenost pacientů * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation ranks among the most popular plastic surgery procedures. Yet, reports on post-operative patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction remain conflicting. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched for eligible studies that reported pre-and/or post-operative Breast-QTM augmentation scores for patient QoL (psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being) and/or satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies (53 patient cohorts and 18,322 patients) were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pairwise meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in patient-reported psychosocial (MD: +38.10) and sexual well-being (MD: +40.20) as well as satisfaction with breast (MD: +47.88) (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved slightly after breast augmentation (MD: +6.97; p = 0.42). The single-arm meta-analysis yielded comparable results, with Breast-QTM scores in psychosocial and sexual well-being as well as satisfaction with breast increasing from 37.2, 31.1, and 26.3 to 75.0, 70.6, and 72.7, respectively (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved by 8.1 (75.8 pre-operatively to 83.9 post-operatively; p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses highlighted higher QoL and satisfaction following breast augmentation for purely esthetic purposes and alloplastic mammaplasty. Although patient-reported physical and sexual well-being increased in the long term, psychosocial well-being was the highest in the short term. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with breast, psychosocial, and sexual well-being increased significantly after breast augmentation. In contrast, patient-reported physical well-being yielded ambivalent results, varying by mammaplasty technique and post-operative follow-up time. Plastic surgeons should be sensitized about our findings to refine eligibility criteria and gain a deeper understanding of the patients' perceived surgical experience. PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: CRD42023409605.
Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery University Hospital Zürich Zurich Switzerland
Division of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25000339
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250107151814.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250107e20240612ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.06.016 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38945110
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Knoedler, Samuel $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- 245 10
- $a Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes / $c S. Knoedler, L. Knoedler, M. Kauke-Navarro, M. Alfertshofer, D. Obed, N. Broer, BS. Kim, S. Könneker, AC. Panayi, G. Hundeshagen, U. Kneser, B. Pomahac, V. Haug
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation ranks among the most popular plastic surgery procedures. Yet, reports on post-operative patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction remain conflicting. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched for eligible studies that reported pre-and/or post-operative Breast-QTM augmentation scores for patient QoL (psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being) and/or satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies (53 patient cohorts and 18,322 patients) were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pairwise meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in patient-reported psychosocial (MD: +38.10) and sexual well-being (MD: +40.20) as well as satisfaction with breast (MD: +47.88) (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved slightly after breast augmentation (MD: +6.97; p = 0.42). The single-arm meta-analysis yielded comparable results, with Breast-QTM scores in psychosocial and sexual well-being as well as satisfaction with breast increasing from 37.2, 31.1, and 26.3 to 75.0, 70.6, and 72.7, respectively (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved by 8.1 (75.8 pre-operatively to 83.9 post-operatively; p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses highlighted higher QoL and satisfaction following breast augmentation for purely esthetic purposes and alloplastic mammaplasty. Although patient-reported physical and sexual well-being increased in the long term, psychosocial well-being was the highest in the short term. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with breast, psychosocial, and sexual well-being increased significantly after breast augmentation. In contrast, patient-reported physical well-being yielded ambivalent results, varying by mammaplasty technique and post-operative follow-up time. Plastic surgeons should be sensitized about our findings to refine eligibility criteria and gain a deeper understanding of the patients' perceived surgical experience. PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: CRD42023409605.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 12
- $a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
- 650 12
- $a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a mamoplastika $x psychologie $x metody $7 D016462
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Knoedler, Leonard $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Kauke-Navarro, Martin $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Alfertshofer, Michael $u Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Obed, Doha $u Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Broer, Niclas $u Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Bogenhausen Academic Teaching Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Kim, Bong-Sung $u Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Könneker, Sören $u Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Panayi, Adriana C $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Hundeshagen, Gabriel $u Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Kneser, Ulrich $u Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Pomahač, Bohdan, $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA $d 1971- $7 xx0117402
- 700 1_
- $a Haug, Valentin $u Department of Hand-, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Electronic address: vfm.haug@gmail.com
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008968 $t Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS $x 1878-0539 $g Roč. 95 (20240612), s. 300-318
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38945110 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250107151810 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2245118 $s 1236339
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 95 $c - $d 300-318 $e 20240612 $i 1878-0539 $m Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS $n J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg $x MED00008968
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250107