BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) significantly lowers breast cancer risk as a preventive surgery. While racial disparities in breast cancer treatment are well-documented, research on racial differences in the utilization and outcomes of RRM is limited. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2008-2022) to identify women who underwent RRM. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared between White and racial minority patients, including Black/African American women. RESULTS: Among 1,285 patients, 88% (n = 1,126) self-identified as White and 12.4% (n = 159) as racial minorities, including 5.8% (n = 74) Black. Minority patients were younger than White patients (50.7±11.4 years vs. 52.6±12.6 years; P = .66). Black patients had a significantly higher mean BMI than White patients (33.6±8.4 kg/m2 vs. 30.6±8.0 kg/m2; P = .03), and higher prevalence of obesity (65%, n = 48 vs. 47%, n = 524; P = .03) and hypertension (51%, n = 38 vs. 30%, n = 342; P = .007). Racial minority patients were more likely to undergo outpatient surgery (81%, n = 129 vs. 57%, n = 645; P < .001) and had shorter hospital stays than White patients (0.8±1.3 days vs. 1±2 days; P = .001). Black patients experienced higher rates of superficial incisional infections (9.5%, n = 7 vs. 2.9%, n = 33; P = .18) and overall complications (18%, n = 13 vs. 10%, n = 113; P = .48) CONCLUSION: This multi-institutional study reveals racial disparities in RRM, with minority patients significantly more likely to present with comorbidities and experience higher complication rates. These findings underscore the need for targeted strategies to ensure equitable access to RRM and improve outcomes for minority patients, advancing health equity in breast cancer prevention.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Hypoalbuminemia, a biomarker of malnutrition, has been associated with adverse surgical outcomes;, however, its impact on breast reduction surgery is not yet well-documented. METHODS: We queried the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program database to identify patients who underwent breast reduction surgery between 2008 and 2022. Patients were grouped by preoperative normal albumin levels (≥3.5 g/dL) and hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL). Preoperative, intraoperative, and 30-day postoperative outcomes, including complications and readmissions, were compared using the univariate tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We included a total of 7277 cases, among whom 96% (n = 6964) had normal albumin values and 4% (n = 298) had hypoalbuminemia (n = 298). Patients with hypoalbuminemia showed a significantly higher body mass index (37.1 ± 8.1 vs. 33.3 ± 6.3 kg/m2, p < 0.001) and were more likely to be Black or African American (49.0 vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001). Comorbidities such as diabetes (14.7 vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.0 vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001), and hypertension (35.2 vs. 26.3%, p = 0.002) were significantly more prevalent in the hypoalbuminemia group. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with a significantly increased risk of complications (13.8 vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001), with higher rates of superficial incisional infections (7.0 vs. 2.6%, p = 0.001) and unplanned readmissions (3.4 vs. 1.4%, p = 0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed hypoalbuminemia as an independent predictor of postoperative complications (OR 1.96, p = 0.001), medical complications (OR 2.62, p = 0.02), and surgical complications (OR 1.91, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Hypoalbuminemia significantly raises the risk of 30-day postoperative complications in breast reduction surgery. Preoperative nutritional assessment and optimization are crucial in improving surgical outcomes, particularly in patients with high body mass index and comorbidities.
- MeSH
- biologické markery krev MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hypoalbuminemie * komplikace krev MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mamoplastika * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- pooperační komplikace * epidemiologie etiologie krev MeSH
- předoperační období MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- znovupřijetí pacienta statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Reduction mammoplasty is popular among people of various age groups, yet the impact of age on postoperative outcomes remains debated. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2008-2021) was queried to identify adult female patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty. Patients were categorized into 10-year age brackets (i.e., 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and >70 years). We compared age-dependent 30-day outcomes via confounder-adjusted multivariate analyses. RESULTS: 40,958 female patients (mean age: 41 ± 14 years and mean body mass index: 31 ± 6.1 kg/m2) were identified. Complications occurred in 6.4% (n = 2635) of cases, with 770 (1.9%) and 483 (1.2%) patients requiring reoperation and readmission, respectively. 1706 (4.2%) women experienced surgical complications, whereas medical complications were generally rare (n = 289; 0.7%). Compared with women aged 18-29 years, risks of any, surgical, and medical complications were higher for patients aged 30-39 years (OR: 1.22, p < 0.01; OR: 1.05, p = 0.51; OR: 1.84, p < 0.01), 40-49 years (OR: 1.34, p < 0.01; OR: 1.17, p = 0.04; OR: 1.54, p = 0.03), 50-59 years (OR: 1.45, p < 0.01; OR: 1.31, p < 0.01; OR: 1.78, p < 0.01), 60-69 years (OR: 1.38 years, p < 0.01; OR: 1.29, p = 0.01; OR: 1.71, p < 0.01), and >70 years (OR: 1.25, p = 0.18; OR: 1.01, p = 0.98; OR: 1.86, p = 0.14). Patients aged >30 years were also more likely to require readmissions and reoperations. CONCLUSION: Patient age significantly affects outcomes after reduction mammoplasty, with the lowest risk in patients aged <30 years. Importantly, the association between age and postoperative morbidity was not linear. These findings can help guide informed decisions, recognizing that while age is a factor, it is not the sole determinant of risk.
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mamoplastika * metody statistika a číselné údaje škodlivé účinky MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- pooperační komplikace * epidemiologie MeSH
- reoperace * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- znovupřijetí pacienta statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
Face transplantation is a viable reconstructive approach for severe craniofacial defects. Despite the evolution witnessed in the field, ethical aspects, clinical and psychosocial implications, public perception, and economic sustainability remain the subject of debate and unanswered questions. Furthermore, poor data reporting and sharing, the absence of standardized metrics for outcome evaluation, and the lack of consensus definitions of success and failure have hampered the development of a "transplantation culture" on a global scale. We completed a 2-round online modified Delphi process with 35 international face transplant stakeholders, including surgeons, clinicians, psychologists, psychiatrists, ethicists, policymakers, and researchers, with a representation of 10 of the 19 face transplant teams that had already performed the procedure and 73% of face transplants. Themes addressed included patient assessment and selection, indications, social support networks, clinical framework, surgical considerations, data on patient progress and outcomes, definitions of success and failure, public image and perception, and financial sustainability. The presented recommendations are the product of a shared commitment of face transplant teams to foster the development of face transplantation and are aimed at providing a gold standard of practice and policy.
- MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- transplantace obličeje * metody MeSH
- vaskularizovaná kompozitní alotransplantace * MeSH
- výzkumný projekt MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Face transplantation is a viable reconstructive approach for severe craniofacial defects. Despite the evolution witnessed in the field, ethical aspects, clinical and psychosocial implications, public perception, and economic sustainability remain the subject of debate and unanswered questions. Furthermore, poor data reporting and sharing, the absence of standardized metrics for outcome evaluation, and the lack of consensus definitions of success and failure have hampered the development of a "transplantation culture" on a global scale. We completed a 2-round online modified Delphi process with 35 international face transplant stakeholders, including surgeons, clinicians, psychologists, psychiatrists, ethicists, policymakers, and researchers, with a representation of 10 of the 19 face transplant teams that had already performed the procedure and 73% of face transplants. Themes addressed included patient assessment and selection, indications, social support networks, clinical framework, surgical considerations, data on patient progress and outcomes, definitions of success and failure, public image and perception, and financial sustainability. The presented recommendations are the product of a shared commitment of face transplant teams to foster the development of face transplantation and are aimed at providing a gold standard of practice and policy.
- MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- transplantace obličeje * metody MeSH
- vaskularizovaná kompozitní alotransplantace * MeSH
- výzkumný projekt MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture (CC) is a common complication following implant-based breast surgery, often requiring surgical intervention. Yet, little is known about risk factors and outcomes following CC surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2008-2021) to identify female patients diagnosed with CC and treated surgically. Outcomes of interest included the incidence of surgical and medical complications at 30-days, reoperations, and readmissions. Confounder-adjusted multivariable analyses were performed to establish risk factors. RESULTS: 5,057 patients with CC were identified (mean age: 55 ± 12 years and mean body mass index [BMI]: 26 ± 6 kg/m2). While 2,841 (65%) women underwent capsulectomy, capsulotomy was performed in 742 patients (15%). Implant removal and replacement were recorded in 1,160 (23%) and 315 (6.2%) cases, respectively. 319 (6.3%) patients experienced postoperative complications, with 155 (3.1%) reoperations and 99 (2.0%) readmissions. While surgical adverse events were recorded in 139 (2.7%) cases, 86 (1.7%) medical complications occurred during the 30 day follow-up. In multivariate analyses, increased BMI (OR: 1.04; p = 0.009), preoperative diagnosis of hypertension (OR: 1.48; p = 0.004), and inpatient setting (OR: 4.15; p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors of complication occurrence. CONCLUSION: Based on 14 years of multi-institutional data, we calculated a net 30 day complication rate of 6.3% after the surgical treatment of CC. We identified higher BMI, hypertension, and inpatient setting as independent risk factors of postoperative complications. Plastic surgeons may wish to integrate these findings into their perioperative workflows, thus optimizing patient counseling and determining candidates' eligibility for CC surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation ranks among the most popular plastic surgery procedures. Yet, reports on post-operative patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction remain conflicting. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched for eligible studies that reported pre-and/or post-operative Breast-QTM augmentation scores for patient QoL (psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being) and/or satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies (53 patient cohorts and 18,322 patients) were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pairwise meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in patient-reported psychosocial (MD: +38.10) and sexual well-being (MD: +40.20) as well as satisfaction with breast (MD: +47.88) (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved slightly after breast augmentation (MD: +6.97; p = 0.42). The single-arm meta-analysis yielded comparable results, with Breast-QTM scores in psychosocial and sexual well-being as well as satisfaction with breast increasing from 37.2, 31.1, and 26.3 to 75.0, 70.6, and 72.7, respectively (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved by 8.1 (75.8 pre-operatively to 83.9 post-operatively; p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses highlighted higher QoL and satisfaction following breast augmentation for purely esthetic purposes and alloplastic mammaplasty. Although patient-reported physical and sexual well-being increased in the long term, psychosocial well-being was the highest in the short term. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with breast, psychosocial, and sexual well-being increased significantly after breast augmentation. In contrast, patient-reported physical well-being yielded ambivalent results, varying by mammaplasty technique and post-operative follow-up time. Plastic surgeons should be sensitized about our findings to refine eligibility criteria and gain a deeper understanding of the patients' perceived surgical experience. PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: CRD42023409605.
BACKGROUND: The increasing demand for gender-affirming surgery (GAS) in transgender and gender-diverse healthcare highlights the importance of breast augmentation surgery (BAS) for transfeminine patients. Despite its significance, there is a lack of research on postoperative outcomes of BAS. METHODS: We analyzed the multi-institutional American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) (2008-2021) database to identify female transgender individuals (TGIs) who underwent BAS surgery, both isolated and combined with concurrent GAS procedures. We evaluated 30-day outcomes, including the incidence of mortality, reoperation, readmission as well as surgical and medical complication occurrence. RESULTS: Of 1699 female TGIs, 92% underwent isolated BAS and 7.7% underwent combined BAS. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 36 ± 12 years and 27 ± 6.6 kg/m2, respectively. Isolated BAS showed a 2.8% complication rate, while combined BAS had a higher rate with 9.1%. Specifically, all complications occurred in patients undergoing BAS with concurrent genitourinary surgery (n = 85; 14%), whereas no adverse events were recorded after combined BAS and facial feminization (n = 19) or chondrolaryngoplasty (n = 19). In patients seeking combined BAS, advanced age (p = 0.05) and nicotine abuse (p = 0.004) were identified as risk factors predisposing to adverse events, whereas American Society of Anesthesiology class 1 was found to be protective (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated BAS in TGIs demonstrates a positive safety profile. Combined surgeries, particularly with genitourinary procedures, pose higher risks. Identifying risk factors such as smoking and advanced age is crucial for patient selection and surgical planning. These findings can aid in refining patient eligibility and inform surgical decision-making for BAS.
- MeSH
- kouření škodlivé účinky epidemiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mamoplastika * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- pooperační komplikace chirurgie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- transgender osoby * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer mortality and treatment differ across racial groups. It remains unclear whether such disparities are also reflected in perioperative outcomes of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. STUDY DESIGN: The authors reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2008-2021) to identify female patients who underwent mastectomy for oncological purposes. The outcomes were stratified by five racial groups (white, Black/African American, Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) and included 30-day mortality, reoperation, readmission, surgical and medical complications, and non-home discharge. RESULTS: The study population included 222 947 patients, 68% ( n =151 522) of whom were white, 11% ( n =23 987) Black/African American, 5% ( n =11 217) Asian, 0.5% ( n =1198) American Indian/Alaska Native, and 0.5% ( n =1018) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. While 136 690 (61%) patients underwent partial mastectomy, 54 490 (24%) and 31 767 (14%) women received simple and radical mastectomy, respectively. Overall, adverse events occurred in 17 222 (7.7%) patients, the largest portion of which were surgical complications ( n =7246; 3.3%). Multivariable analysis revealed that being of Asian race was protective against perioperative complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.71; P <0.001], whereas American Indian/Alaska Native women were most vulnerable to the complication occurrence (OR=1.41; P <0.001). Black/African American patients had a significantly lower risk of medical (OR=0.59; P <0.001) and surgical complications (OR=0.60; P <0.001) after partial and radical mastectomy, respectively, their likelihood of readmission (OR=1.14; P =0.045) following partial mastectomy was significantly increased. CONCLUSION: The authors identified American Indian/Alaska Native women as particularly vulnerable to complications following mastectomy. Asian patients experienced the lowest rate of complications in the perioperative period. The authors' analyses revealed comparable confounder-adjusted outcomes following partial and complete mastectomy between Black and white races. Their findings call for care equalization in the field of breast cancer surgery.
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mastektomie * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- nádory prsu * chirurgie MeSH
- rasové skupiny MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
