Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power

P. Hollý, T. Hubená, M. Čihák, A. Pavlíková, D. Kemlink, O. Ulmanová, J. Rusz, R. Jech, R. Krupička, E. Růžička

. 2024 ; 11 (12) : 1582-1586. [pub] 20240711

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003320

Grantová podpora
580218 Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
MH CZ-DRO-VFN64165 Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
National Institute for Neurological Research, Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5107

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK PubMed Central od 2014 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central od 2014 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET). METHODS: Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore. RESULTS: TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior. CONCLUSIONS: TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003320
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250424095118.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/mdc3.14160 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38989643
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hollý, Petr $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000252428725
245    10
$a Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power / $c P. Hollý, T. Hubená, M. Čihák, A. Pavlíková, D. Kemlink, O. Ulmanová, J. Rusz, R. Jech, R. Krupička, E. Růžička
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET). METHODS: Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore. RESULTS: TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior. CONCLUSIONS: TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a esenciální tremor $x patofyziologie $x diagnóza $7 D020329
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a činnosti denního života $7 D000203
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a akcelerometrie $x metody $7 D061725
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a posuzování pracovní neschopnosti $7 D004185
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Hubená, Tereza $u Department of Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $7 xx0267639
700    1_
$a Čihák, Martin $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pavlíková, Aneta $u Department of Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kemlink, David $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ulmanová, Olga $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rusz, Jan $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Circuit Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000210363054 $7 xx0093732
700    1_
$a Jech, Robert $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000297328947 $7 xx0082225
700    1_
$a Krupička, Radim $u Department of Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Růžička, Evžen $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000248939661 $7 jo20000074065
773    0_
$w MED00197327 $t Movement disorders clinical practice $x 2330-1619 $g Roč. 11, č. 12 (2024), s. 1582-1586
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38989643 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250424095115 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263216 $s 1239327
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 11 $c 12 $d 1582-1586 $e 20240711 $i 2330-1619 $m Movement disorders clinical practice $n Mov Disord Clin Pract $x MED00197327
GRA    __
$a 580218 $p Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
GRA    __
$a MH CZ-DRO-VFN64165 $p Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
GRA    __
$p National Institute for Neurological Research, Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5107
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...