• Something wrong with this record ?

Volumes and velocities: Meta-analysis of PC-MRI studies in normal pressure hydrocephalus

H. Whitley, P. Skalický, A. Zazay, A. Bubeníková, O. Bradáč

. 2024 ; 166 (1) : 463. [pub] 20241119

Language English Country Austria

Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Review

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago

UNLABELLED: PURPOSE : Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) represents an opportunity to non-invasively investigate cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) flow in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Studies in recent years have explored the diagnostic and prognostic value of PC-MRI derived parameters. This review aims to identify all PC-MRI studies of iNPH published since 2010, synthesise a review based on collated results, and analyse specific flow parameters identified in the selected studies. METHODS: Our protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO [CRD42020180826]. We systematically searched four databases: Pubmed, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane library to identify all eligible studies. Quality assessment was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [19]. Systematic review was conducted according to Prisma guidelines. A random-effects model was used to perform meta-analysis on the available flow parameters. RESULTS: Eighteen records were identified for inclusion. Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis, representing 107 iNPH patients and 82 controls. CSF flow parameters available for analysis were stroke volume and peak velocity. Both were significantly higher than controls (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0045 respectively) according to our random-effects analysis, consistent with a model of hyper-dynamic CSF in iNPH. Our systematic review revealed average stroke volumes in iNPH ranging from 43uL to over 200uL. Peak velocity values ranged from 5.9 cm/s to 12.8 cm/s. CONCLUSION: Significant increases in stroke volume and peak velocity values in iNPH patients suggest a place for PC-MRI as supplementary evidence in the diagnostic work-up of iNPH. Although shunting reduces aqueductal stroke volume and peak velocity, the ability of pre-shunt values to reliably predict treatment response remains complicated. We suggest that it may be more appropriate to consider a range of values that reflect varying probabilities of shunt success. We recommend that future studies should prioritise standardising PC-MRI protocols, and before then PC-MRI findings should be considered supportive rather than determinative.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003433
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104337.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 au f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00701-024-06333-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39560792
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a au
100    1_
$a Whitley, Helen $u Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare, London, UK. Helen.whitley@gmail.com $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Nové Město, Czech Republic. Helen.whitley@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/000000022798296X
245    10
$a Volumes and velocities: Meta-analysis of PC-MRI studies in normal pressure hydrocephalus / $c H. Whitley, P. Skalický, A. Zazay, A. Bubeníková, O. Bradáč
520    9_
$a UNLABELLED: PURPOSE : Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) represents an opportunity to non-invasively investigate cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) flow in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Studies in recent years have explored the diagnostic and prognostic value of PC-MRI derived parameters. This review aims to identify all PC-MRI studies of iNPH published since 2010, synthesise a review based on collated results, and analyse specific flow parameters identified in the selected studies. METHODS: Our protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO [CRD42020180826]. We systematically searched four databases: Pubmed, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane library to identify all eligible studies. Quality assessment was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [19]. Systematic review was conducted according to Prisma guidelines. A random-effects model was used to perform meta-analysis on the available flow parameters. RESULTS: Eighteen records were identified for inclusion. Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis, representing 107 iNPH patients and 82 controls. CSF flow parameters available for analysis were stroke volume and peak velocity. Both were significantly higher than controls (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0045 respectively) according to our random-effects analysis, consistent with a model of hyper-dynamic CSF in iNPH. Our systematic review revealed average stroke volumes in iNPH ranging from 43uL to over 200uL. Peak velocity values ranged from 5.9 cm/s to 12.8 cm/s. CONCLUSION: Significant increases in stroke volume and peak velocity values in iNPH patients suggest a place for PC-MRI as supplementary evidence in the diagnostic work-up of iNPH. Although shunting reduces aqueductal stroke volume and peak velocity, the ability of pre-shunt values to reliably predict treatment response remains complicated. We suggest that it may be more appropriate to consider a range of values that reflect varying probabilities of shunt success. We recommend that future studies should prioritise standardising PC-MRI protocols, and before then PC-MRI findings should be considered supportive rather than determinative.
650    12
$a normotenzní hydrocefalus $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D006850
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Skalický, Petr $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277647254 $7 xx0255110
700    1_
$a Zazay, Awista $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Nové Město, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bubeníková, Adéla $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000245329219
700    1_
$a Bradáč, Ondrej $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000343645522 $7 xx0121581
773    0_
$w MED00009022 $t Acta neurochirurgica $x 0942-0940 $g Roč. 166, č. 1 (2024), s. 463
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39560792 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104332 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263297 $s 1239440
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 166 $c 1 $d 463 $e 20241119 $i 0942-0940 $m Acta neurochirurgica $n Acta Neurochir (Wien) $x MED00009022
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...