-
Something wrong with this record ?
Volumes and velocities: Meta-analysis of PC-MRI studies in normal pressure hydrocephalus
H. Whitley, P. Skalický, A. Zazay, A. Bubeníková, O. Bradáč
Language English Country Austria
Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Review
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging * methods MeSH
- Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure * diagnostic imaging physiopathology surgery MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
UNLABELLED: PURPOSE : Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) represents an opportunity to non-invasively investigate cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) flow in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Studies in recent years have explored the diagnostic and prognostic value of PC-MRI derived parameters. This review aims to identify all PC-MRI studies of iNPH published since 2010, synthesise a review based on collated results, and analyse specific flow parameters identified in the selected studies. METHODS: Our protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO [CRD42020180826]. We systematically searched four databases: Pubmed, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane library to identify all eligible studies. Quality assessment was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [19]. Systematic review was conducted according to Prisma guidelines. A random-effects model was used to perform meta-analysis on the available flow parameters. RESULTS: Eighteen records were identified for inclusion. Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis, representing 107 iNPH patients and 82 controls. CSF flow parameters available for analysis were stroke volume and peak velocity. Both were significantly higher than controls (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0045 respectively) according to our random-effects analysis, consistent with a model of hyper-dynamic CSF in iNPH. Our systematic review revealed average stroke volumes in iNPH ranging from 43uL to over 200uL. Peak velocity values ranged from 5.9 cm/s to 12.8 cm/s. CONCLUSION: Significant increases in stroke volume and peak velocity values in iNPH patients suggest a place for PC-MRI as supplementary evidence in the diagnostic work-up of iNPH. Although shunting reduces aqueductal stroke volume and peak velocity, the ability of pre-shunt values to reliably predict treatment response remains complicated. We suggest that it may be more appropriate to consider a range of values that reflect varying probabilities of shunt success. We recommend that future studies should prioritise standardising PC-MRI protocols, and before then PC-MRI findings should be considered supportive rather than determinative.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Nové Město Czech Republic
Charing Cross Hospital Imperial College Healthcare London UK
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25003433
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250206104337.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250121s2024 au f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00701-024-06333-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39560792
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a au
- 100 1_
- $a Whitley, Helen $u Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare, London, UK. Helen.whitley@gmail.com $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Nové Město, Czech Republic. Helen.whitley@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/000000022798296X
- 245 10
- $a Volumes and velocities: Meta-analysis of PC-MRI studies in normal pressure hydrocephalus / $c H. Whitley, P. Skalický, A. Zazay, A. Bubeníková, O. Bradáč
- 520 9_
- $a UNLABELLED: PURPOSE : Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) represents an opportunity to non-invasively investigate cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) flow in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Studies in recent years have explored the diagnostic and prognostic value of PC-MRI derived parameters. This review aims to identify all PC-MRI studies of iNPH published since 2010, synthesise a review based on collated results, and analyse specific flow parameters identified in the selected studies. METHODS: Our protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO [CRD42020180826]. We systematically searched four databases: Pubmed, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane library to identify all eligible studies. Quality assessment was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [19]. Systematic review was conducted according to Prisma guidelines. A random-effects model was used to perform meta-analysis on the available flow parameters. RESULTS: Eighteen records were identified for inclusion. Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis, representing 107 iNPH patients and 82 controls. CSF flow parameters available for analysis were stroke volume and peak velocity. Both were significantly higher than controls (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0045 respectively) according to our random-effects analysis, consistent with a model of hyper-dynamic CSF in iNPH. Our systematic review revealed average stroke volumes in iNPH ranging from 43uL to over 200uL. Peak velocity values ranged from 5.9 cm/s to 12.8 cm/s. CONCLUSION: Significant increases in stroke volume and peak velocity values in iNPH patients suggest a place for PC-MRI as supplementary evidence in the diagnostic work-up of iNPH. Although shunting reduces aqueductal stroke volume and peak velocity, the ability of pre-shunt values to reliably predict treatment response remains complicated. We suggest that it may be more appropriate to consider a range of values that reflect varying probabilities of shunt success. We recommend that future studies should prioritise standardising PC-MRI protocols, and before then PC-MRI findings should be considered supportive rather than determinative.
- 650 12
- $a normotenzní hydrocefalus $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D006850
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Skalický, Petr $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277647254 $7 xx0255110
- 700 1_
- $a Zazay, Awista $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Nové Město, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bubeníková, Adéla $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000245329219
- 700 1_
- $a Bradáč, Ondrej $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and Charles University, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200/1, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000343645522 $7 xx0121581
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009022 $t Acta neurochirurgica $x 0942-0940 $g Roč. 166, č. 1 (2024), s. 463
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39560792 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250121 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250206104332 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2263297 $s 1239440
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 166 $c 1 $d 463 $e 20241119 $i 0942-0940 $m Acta neurochirurgica $n Acta Neurochir (Wien) $x MED00009022
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250121