• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Perioperative patient safety recommendations: systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

I. Martinez-Nicolas, D. Arnal-Velasco, E. Romero-García, N. Fabregas, Y. Sanduende Otero, I. Leon, AA. Bartakke, J. Silva-Garcia, A. Rodriguez, C. Valli, S. Zamarian, A. Zaludek, J. Meneses-Echavez, AF. Loaiza-Betancur, P. Sousa, C. Orrego, V....

. 2024 ; 8 (6) : . [pub] 20241029

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003771

Grantová podpora
European Union as part of 'SAFEty in surgical care through Standardization and harmonization of perioperative care in Europe'
101057825 European Union Horizon Europe Framework Programme

BACKGROUND: Surgical-related incidents are a common cause of in-hospital adverse events. Surgical patient safety would benefit from evidence-based practices, but a comprehensive collection of patient safety recommendations is still lacking. This study aimed to compile and assess the perioperative patient safety recommendations for adults. METHOD: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines was conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Virtual Health Library Regional Portal, and Trip Database from 2012 to 2022. Eligibility criteria followed a PICAR strategy for patient safety recommendations in the perioperative care continuum. Guidelines were appraised for quality, particularly focusing on the 'rigour of development' domain of the AGREE-II tool for those containing strong recommendations. Descriptive analyses were conducted, emphasizing guideline quality, recommendation strength, and the supporting level of evidence. RESULTS: From the 267 guidelines, 4666 perioperative patient safety recommendations were extracted, of which 44.9% (2095) were strongly recommended. Of these, 322 had the highest level of evidence, but only 18 guidelines met high standards in the AGREE-II 'rigour of development' domain. A subset of 78 recommendations ranked the highest in the strength of recommendation, level of evidence, and rigour of development of their guidelines. A gap was found within pre-admission and post-discharge care recommendations. DISCUSSION: This review highlights the noteworthy variability in the methodological quality of the guidelines, and a discordance between strength of recommendation and evidence level of the available perioperative patient safety recommendations. These findings provide valuable information for advising policy decisions and promoting best practices to enhance global surgical safety. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022347449).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003771
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104704.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae143 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39661325
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Martinez-Nicolas, Ismael $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000202543741
245    10
$a Perioperative patient safety recommendations: systematic review of clinical practice guidelines / $c I. Martinez-Nicolas, D. Arnal-Velasco, E. Romero-García, N. Fabregas, Y. Sanduende Otero, I. Leon, AA. Bartakke, J. Silva-Garcia, A. Rodriguez, C. Valli, S. Zamarian, A. Zaludek, J. Meneses-Echavez, AF. Loaiza-Betancur, P. Sousa, C. Orrego, V. Soria-Aledo, SAFEST Consortium
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Surgical-related incidents are a common cause of in-hospital adverse events. Surgical patient safety would benefit from evidence-based practices, but a comprehensive collection of patient safety recommendations is still lacking. This study aimed to compile and assess the perioperative patient safety recommendations for adults. METHOD: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines was conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Virtual Health Library Regional Portal, and Trip Database from 2012 to 2022. Eligibility criteria followed a PICAR strategy for patient safety recommendations in the perioperative care continuum. Guidelines were appraised for quality, particularly focusing on the 'rigour of development' domain of the AGREE-II tool for those containing strong recommendations. Descriptive analyses were conducted, emphasizing guideline quality, recommendation strength, and the supporting level of evidence. RESULTS: From the 267 guidelines, 4666 perioperative patient safety recommendations were extracted, of which 44.9% (2095) were strongly recommended. Of these, 322 had the highest level of evidence, but only 18 guidelines met high standards in the AGREE-II 'rigour of development' domain. A subset of 78 recommendations ranked the highest in the strength of recommendation, level of evidence, and rigour of development of their guidelines. A gap was found within pre-admission and post-discharge care recommendations. DISCUSSION: This review highlights the noteworthy variability in the methodological quality of the guidelines, and a discordance between strength of recommendation and evidence level of the available perioperative patient safety recommendations. These findings provide valuable information for advising policy decisions and promoting best practices to enhance global surgical safety. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022347449).
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a bezpečnost pacientů $x normy $7 D061214
650    12
$a perioperační péče $x normy $x metody $7 D019990
650    12
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Arnal-Velasco, Daniel $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $u Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcon, Alcorcon, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000280164472
700    1_
$a Romero-García, Eva $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $u Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Hospital Univesitari Policlinic La Fe, Valencia, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000242490728
700    1_
$a Fabregas, Neus $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $u Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000345690677
700    1_
$a Sanduende Otero, Yolanda $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $u Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Hospital Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000225175988
700    1_
$a Leon, Irene $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $u Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000321728933
700    1_
$a Bartakke, Ashish A $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $u Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Hospital Valle de Los Pedroches, Pozoblanco, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000199282666
700    1_
$a Silva-Garcia, Javier $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $u Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000167264527
700    1_
$a Rodriguez, Anna $u Avedis Donabedian Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain $u Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/000000034441147X
700    1_
$a Valli, Claudia $u Avedis Donabedian Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain $u Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000243933690
700    1_
$a Zamarian, Sandro $u Spojená Akreditační Komise, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zaludek, Adam $u Spojená Akreditační Komise, Prague, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000299993975
700    1_
$a Meneses-Echavez, Jose $u Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway $1 https://orcid.org/0000000343126909
700    1_
$a Loaiza-Betancur, Andrés F $u Instituto Universitario de Educación Física, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000182588175
700    1_
$a Sousa, Paulo $u NOVA National School of Public Health, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal $1 https://orcid.org/0000000195026075
700    1_
$a Orrego, Carola $u Avedis Donabedian Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain $u Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain $u Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000229786268
700    1_
$a Soria-Aledo, Victor $u Spanish Anaesthesia and Reanimation Incident Reporting System (SENSAR), Alcorcon, Spain $u Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000301594034
710    2_
$a SAFEST Consortium
773    0_
$w MED00207802 $t BJS open $x 2474-9842 $g Roč. 8, č. 6 (2024)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39661325 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104659 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263508 $s 1239778
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 8 $c 6 $e 20241029 $i 2474-9842 $m BJS open $n BJS Open $x MED00207802
GRA    __
$p European Union as part of 'SAFEty in surgical care through Standardization and harmonization of perioperative care in Europe'
GRA    __
$a 101057825 $p European Union Horizon Europe Framework Programme
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace