-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis with an inflammatory pancreatic head mass: a retrospective study
M. Rousek, P. Záruba, J. Pudil, E. Kšírová, R. Pohnán
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
MO 1012
Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
MO 1012
Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
MO 1012
Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- chronická pankreatitida * chirurgie MeSH
- délka operace * MeSH
- délka pobytu statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- duodenum chirurgie patologie MeSH
- léčba šetřící orgány metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mortalita v nemocnicích MeSH
- pankreas * chirurgie patologie MeSH
- pankreatektomie metody škodlivé účinky MeSH
- pankreatoduodenektomie * metody škodlivé účinky MeSH
- pooperační komplikace etiologie epidemiologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Conservative treatment of chronic pancreatitis has only a limited effect in most patients. Surgery offers very good long-term results, even in the early stages of the disease. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients undergo surgical treatment. The aim of this work was to summarise the current treatment options for patients with an inflammatory mass of the pancreatic head. Data from patients in our study demonstrates that the surgery is a safe method, and here we compare the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: All patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy or a duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in our department between 2014 and 2022 were included in this study. Perioperative and early postoperative results were statistically analysed and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-eight pancreaticoduodenectomies and 23 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections were performed. The overall mortality was 3%, whereas the in-hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy was 5%. The mortality after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection was 0%. No statistically significant differences in the hospital stay, blood loss, and serious morbidity were found in either surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter in the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection group. CONCLUSIONS: Both pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection are safe treatment options. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection showed a statistically significant superiority in the operative time compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although other monitored parameters did not show a statistically significant difference, the high risk of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy with a mortality of 5%; maintenance of the duodenum and upper loop of jejunum, and lower risk of metabolic dysfunctions after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection may favour duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in recommended diagnoses. Attending physicians should be more encouraged to use a multidisciplinary approach to assess the suitability of surgical treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25003956
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250206104822.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12876-024-03338-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39358718
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Rousek, Michael $u Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. michael.rousek@uvn.cz
- 245 10
- $a Surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis with an inflammatory pancreatic head mass: a retrospective study / $c M. Rousek, P. Záruba, J. Pudil, E. Kšírová, R. Pohnán
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Conservative treatment of chronic pancreatitis has only a limited effect in most patients. Surgery offers very good long-term results, even in the early stages of the disease. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients undergo surgical treatment. The aim of this work was to summarise the current treatment options for patients with an inflammatory mass of the pancreatic head. Data from patients in our study demonstrates that the surgery is a safe method, and here we compare the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: All patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy or a duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in our department between 2014 and 2022 were included in this study. Perioperative and early postoperative results were statistically analysed and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-eight pancreaticoduodenectomies and 23 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections were performed. The overall mortality was 3%, whereas the in-hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy was 5%. The mortality after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection was 0%. No statistically significant differences in the hospital stay, blood loss, and serious morbidity were found in either surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter in the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection group. CONCLUSIONS: Both pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection are safe treatment options. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection showed a statistically significant superiority in the operative time compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although other monitored parameters did not show a statistically significant difference, the high risk of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy with a mortality of 5%; maintenance of the duodenum and upper loop of jejunum, and lower risk of metabolic dysfunctions after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection may favour duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in recommended diagnoses. Attending physicians should be more encouraged to use a multidisciplinary approach to assess the suitability of surgical treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a chronická pankreatitida $x chirurgie $7 D050500
- 650 12
- $a pankreatoduodenektomie $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016577
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a pankreas $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D010179
- 650 12
- $a délka operace $7 D061646
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a délka pobytu $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D007902
- 650 _2
- $a pankreatektomie $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D010180
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a duodenum $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D004386
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mortalita v nemocnicích $7 D017052
- 650 _2
- $a léčba šetřící orgány $x metody $7 D059351
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Záruba, Pavel $u Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pudil, Jiří $u Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kšírová, Eliška $u Department of Bioinformatics, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pohnán, Radek $u Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006914 $t BMC gastroenterology $x 1471-230X $g Roč. 24, č. 1 (2024), s. 345
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39358718 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250121 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250206104818 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2263602 $s 1239963
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 24 $c 1 $d 345 $e 20241002 $i 1471-230X $m BMC gastroenterology $n BMC Gastroenterol $x MED00006914
- GRA __
- $a MO 1012 $p Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
- GRA __
- $a MO 1012 $p Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
- GRA __
- $a MO 1012 $p Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250121