• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Repeat Transurethral Resection (TUR) + Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Versus Upfront Induction BCG After TUR in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Feasibility Phase of a Randomized Controlled Study

F. Soria, M. Rosazza, S. Livoti, D. Dutto, F. Colucci, RJ. Sylvester, SF. Shariat, M. Babjuk, J. Palou, P. Gontero

. 2024 ; 10 (4) : 648-653. [pub] 20231103

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25004160

BACKGROUND: High-level evidence supporting the role of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is lacking. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing whether immediate reTUR has an impact on patient prognosis is essential. However, since such a RCT will require enrollment of a high number of patients, a preliminary feasibility study is appropriate. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of an RCT investigating the impact of immediate reTUR + adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) versus upfront induction BCG after initial TUR in NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either reTUR + adjuvant BCG or upfront induction BCG after TUR. Patients with macroscopically completely resected high-grade T1 NMIBC, with or without concomitant carcinoma in situ, and with detrusor muscle (DM) present in the initial TUR specimen were considered eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological subtypes, hydronephrosis, concomitant upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), or urothelial carcinoma within the prostatic urethra. The aim was to enroll 30 patients in this feasibility study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The patient recruitment rate was the primary outcome. Oncological outcomes (recurrence-free and progression-free survival) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 30 patients (15 per arm) were randomized over a period of 14 mo (August 2020-October 2021). Two eligible patients refused the randomization, resulting in a patient compliance rate of 93.3% for the study protocol. We excluded 49 ineligible patients before randomization because of histological subtypes (n = 16, 33%), LVI (n = 9, 18%), DM absence in the TUR specimen (n = 12, 24%), metastatic disease (n = 5, 10%), concomitant UTUC (n = 3, 6%), or hydronephrosis (n = 4, 8%). At reTUR, persistent disease was found in four patients (29%) and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease in one (7%). Over median follow-up of 17 mo, disease recurrence was detected in three patients (23%) in the reTUR arm and six patients (40%) in the upfront BCG arm. Progression to muscle-invasive disease was observed in one patient treated with upfront BCG. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing upfront BCG versus reTUR + BCG in high-grade T1 NMIBC has been demonstrated. Our results underline the need to screen a large number of patients owing to characteristics meeting the exclusion criteria in a high percentage of cases. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that a clinical trial of the role of a repeat surgical procedure to remove bladder tumors through the urethra would be feasible among patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These preliminary results may help in refining the role of this repeat procedure for patients in this category.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25004160
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206105957.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.019 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37923633
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Soria, Francesco $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy. Electronic address: francesco.soria@unito.it
245    10
$a Repeat Transurethral Resection (TUR) + Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Versus Upfront Induction BCG After TUR in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Feasibility Phase of a Randomized Controlled Study / $c F. Soria, M. Rosazza, S. Livoti, D. Dutto, F. Colucci, RJ. Sylvester, SF. Shariat, M. Babjuk, J. Palou, P. Gontero
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: High-level evidence supporting the role of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is lacking. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing whether immediate reTUR has an impact on patient prognosis is essential. However, since such a RCT will require enrollment of a high number of patients, a preliminary feasibility study is appropriate. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of an RCT investigating the impact of immediate reTUR + adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) versus upfront induction BCG after initial TUR in NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either reTUR + adjuvant BCG or upfront induction BCG after TUR. Patients with macroscopically completely resected high-grade T1 NMIBC, with or without concomitant carcinoma in situ, and with detrusor muscle (DM) present in the initial TUR specimen were considered eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological subtypes, hydronephrosis, concomitant upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), or urothelial carcinoma within the prostatic urethra. The aim was to enroll 30 patients in this feasibility study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The patient recruitment rate was the primary outcome. Oncological outcomes (recurrence-free and progression-free survival) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 30 patients (15 per arm) were randomized over a period of 14 mo (August 2020-October 2021). Two eligible patients refused the randomization, resulting in a patient compliance rate of 93.3% for the study protocol. We excluded 49 ineligible patients before randomization because of histological subtypes (n = 16, 33%), LVI (n = 9, 18%), DM absence in the TUR specimen (n = 12, 24%), metastatic disease (n = 5, 10%), concomitant UTUC (n = 3, 6%), or hydronephrosis (n = 4, 8%). At reTUR, persistent disease was found in four patients (29%) and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease in one (7%). Over median follow-up of 17 mo, disease recurrence was detected in three patients (23%) in the reTUR arm and six patients (40%) in the upfront BCG arm. Progression to muscle-invasive disease was observed in one patient treated with upfront BCG. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing upfront BCG versus reTUR + BCG in high-grade T1 NMIBC has been demonstrated. Our results underline the need to screen a large number of patients owing to characteristics meeting the exclusion criteria in a high percentage of cases. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that a clinical trial of the role of a repeat surgical procedure to remove bladder tumors through the urethra would be feasible among patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These preliminary results may help in refining the role of this repeat procedure for patients in this category.
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x chirurgie $x patologie $x farmakoterapie $7 D001749
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
650    12
$a BCG vakcína $x terapeutické užití $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D001500
650    12
$a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
650    12
$a adjuvancia imunologická $x terapeutické užití $7 D000276
650    _2
$a cystektomie $x metody $7 D015653
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a reoperace $7 D012086
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a uretra $7 D014521
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a kombinovaná terapie $7 D003131
650    _2
$a nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu $7 D000093284
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Rosazza, Matteo $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
700    1_
$a Livoti, Simone $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
700    1_
$a Dutto, Daniele $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
700    1_
$a Colucci, Fulvia $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
700    1_
$a Sylvester, Richard J $u European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
700    1_
$a Babjuk, Marek $u Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Palou, Joan $u Department of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Gontero, Paolo $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
773    0_
$w MED00193513 $t European urology focus $x 2405-4569 $g Roč. 10, č. 4 (2024), s. 648-653
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37923633 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206105953 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263731 $s 1240167
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 10 $c 4 $d 648-653 $e 20231103 $i 2405-4569 $m European urology focus $n Eur Urol Focus $x MED00193513
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...