-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Repeat Transurethral Resection (TUR) + Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Versus Upfront Induction BCG After TUR in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Feasibility Phase of a Randomized Controlled Study
F. Soria, M. Rosazza, S. Livoti, D. Dutto, F. Colucci, RJ. Sylvester, SF. Shariat, M. Babjuk, J. Palou, P. Gontero
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, srovnávací studie
- MeSH
- adjuvancia imunologická * terapeutické užití MeSH
- BCG vakcína * terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- cystektomie metody MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru * MeSH
- kombinovaná terapie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * chirurgie patologie farmakoterapie MeSH
- reoperace MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- studie proveditelnosti * MeSH
- uretra MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: High-level evidence supporting the role of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is lacking. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing whether immediate reTUR has an impact on patient prognosis is essential. However, since such a RCT will require enrollment of a high number of patients, a preliminary feasibility study is appropriate. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of an RCT investigating the impact of immediate reTUR + adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) versus upfront induction BCG after initial TUR in NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either reTUR + adjuvant BCG or upfront induction BCG after TUR. Patients with macroscopically completely resected high-grade T1 NMIBC, with or without concomitant carcinoma in situ, and with detrusor muscle (DM) present in the initial TUR specimen were considered eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological subtypes, hydronephrosis, concomitant upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), or urothelial carcinoma within the prostatic urethra. The aim was to enroll 30 patients in this feasibility study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The patient recruitment rate was the primary outcome. Oncological outcomes (recurrence-free and progression-free survival) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 30 patients (15 per arm) were randomized over a period of 14 mo (August 2020-October 2021). Two eligible patients refused the randomization, resulting in a patient compliance rate of 93.3% for the study protocol. We excluded 49 ineligible patients before randomization because of histological subtypes (n = 16, 33%), LVI (n = 9, 18%), DM absence in the TUR specimen (n = 12, 24%), metastatic disease (n = 5, 10%), concomitant UTUC (n = 3, 6%), or hydronephrosis (n = 4, 8%). At reTUR, persistent disease was found in four patients (29%) and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease in one (7%). Over median follow-up of 17 mo, disease recurrence was detected in three patients (23%) in the reTUR arm and six patients (40%) in the upfront BCG arm. Progression to muscle-invasive disease was observed in one patient treated with upfront BCG. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing upfront BCG versus reTUR + BCG in high-grade T1 NMIBC has been demonstrated. Our results underline the need to screen a large number of patients owing to characteristics meeting the exclusion criteria in a high percentage of cases. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that a clinical trial of the role of a repeat surgical procedure to remove bladder tumors through the urethra would be feasible among patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These preliminary results may help in refining the role of this repeat procedure for patients in this category.
Department of Urology Fundaciò Puigvert Barcelona Spain
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY USA
Division of Urology Department of Surgical Sciences Torino School of Medicine Torino Italy
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25004160
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250206105957.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250121s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.019 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37923633
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Soria, Francesco $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy. Electronic address: francesco.soria@unito.it
- 245 10
- $a Repeat Transurethral Resection (TUR) + Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Versus Upfront Induction BCG After TUR in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Feasibility Phase of a Randomized Controlled Study / $c F. Soria, M. Rosazza, S. Livoti, D. Dutto, F. Colucci, RJ. Sylvester, SF. Shariat, M. Babjuk, J. Palou, P. Gontero
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: High-level evidence supporting the role of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is lacking. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing whether immediate reTUR has an impact on patient prognosis is essential. However, since such a RCT will require enrollment of a high number of patients, a preliminary feasibility study is appropriate. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of an RCT investigating the impact of immediate reTUR + adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) versus upfront induction BCG after initial TUR in NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either reTUR + adjuvant BCG or upfront induction BCG after TUR. Patients with macroscopically completely resected high-grade T1 NMIBC, with or without concomitant carcinoma in situ, and with detrusor muscle (DM) present in the initial TUR specimen were considered eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological subtypes, hydronephrosis, concomitant upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), or urothelial carcinoma within the prostatic urethra. The aim was to enroll 30 patients in this feasibility study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The patient recruitment rate was the primary outcome. Oncological outcomes (recurrence-free and progression-free survival) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 30 patients (15 per arm) were randomized over a period of 14 mo (August 2020-October 2021). Two eligible patients refused the randomization, resulting in a patient compliance rate of 93.3% for the study protocol. We excluded 49 ineligible patients before randomization because of histological subtypes (n = 16, 33%), LVI (n = 9, 18%), DM absence in the TUR specimen (n = 12, 24%), metastatic disease (n = 5, 10%), concomitant UTUC (n = 3, 6%), or hydronephrosis (n = 4, 8%). At reTUR, persistent disease was found in four patients (29%) and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease in one (7%). Over median follow-up of 17 mo, disease recurrence was detected in three patients (23%) in the reTUR arm and six patients (40%) in the upfront BCG arm. Progression to muscle-invasive disease was observed in one patient treated with upfront BCG. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing upfront BCG versus reTUR + BCG in high-grade T1 NMIBC has been demonstrated. Our results underline the need to screen a large number of patients owing to characteristics meeting the exclusion criteria in a high percentage of cases. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that a clinical trial of the role of a repeat surgical procedure to remove bladder tumors through the urethra would be feasible among patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These preliminary results may help in refining the role of this repeat procedure for patients in this category.
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x chirurgie $x patologie $x farmakoterapie $7 D001749
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
- 650 12
- $a BCG vakcína $x terapeutické užití $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D001500
- 650 12
- $a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
- 650 12
- $a adjuvancia imunologická $x terapeutické užití $7 D000276
- 650 _2
- $a cystektomie $x metody $7 D015653
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a reoperace $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a uretra $7 D014521
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a kombinovaná terapie $7 D003131
- 650 _2
- $a nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu $7 D000093284
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Rosazza, Matteo $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Livoti, Simone $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Dutto, Daniele $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Colucci, Fulvia $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Sylvester, Richard J $u European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- 700 1_
- $a Babjuk, Marek $u Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Palou, Joan $u Department of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Gontero, Paolo $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
- 773 0_
- $w MED00193513 $t European urology focus $x 2405-4569 $g Roč. 10, č. 4 (2024), s. 648-653
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37923633 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250121 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250206105953 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2263731 $s 1240167
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 10 $c 4 $d 648-653 $e 20231103 $i 2405-4569 $m European urology focus $n Eur Urol Focus $x MED00193513
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250121