-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy in Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors [Hodnocení diagnostické přesnosti perkutánní jádrové jehlové biopsie u nádorů kostí a měkkých tkání]
T. Cengiz, A. Yurtbay, O. Muslu, Ş. Aydin Şimşek, AB. Özbalci, HS. Coşkun, YS. Bariş, N. Dabak
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39781639
DOI
10.55095/achot2024/042
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biopsie dutou jehlou metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fluoroskopie metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- nádory kostí * patologie diagnóza chirurgie MeSH
- nádory měkkých tkání * patologie diagnóza MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie metody MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita * MeSH
- ultrazvukem navigovaná biopsie metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Open (incisional) biopsies have long been accepted as the gold standard in diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors. However, the main disadvantage of this method is that it can lead to increased contamination, hematoma, infection, and pathological fracture. Compared to open biopsies, percutaneous core needle biopsies are less invasive, do not require hospitalization, have low costs and low complication rates, and there is no need for wound healing in cases that require radiotherapy. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of percutaneous core needle biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included the results of 250 percutaneous core needle biopsies of 244 patients who presented at the tertiary university hospital between September 2012 - September 2022 and were diagnosed with a bone or soft tissue tumor using the percutaneous core needle biopsy method and then underwent surgical excision in the Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy rates were calculated for the percutaneous core needle biopsy method according to the compatibility of the results. RESULTS: A fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous Jamshidi needle biopsy performed by an orthopedist for lesions originating from the bone has a diagnostic accuracy of 96%. CT-guided percutaneous Jamshidi needle biopsy performed by a radiologist for lesions originating from the bone has a diagnostic accuracy of 88.9%. Percutaneous Tru-cut needle biopsy performed by an orthopedist without imaging guidance for lesions originating from soft tissue has a diagnostic accuracy of 92%. USGguided percutaneous Tru-cut needle biopsy performed by a radiologist for lesions originating from soft tissue has a diagnostic accuracy of 96,7% (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: The diagnostic accuracy of open biopsies ranges from 91% to 99% in the literature. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies in recent studies ranges from 76% to 99%. Compared to the literature, our study has shown that biopsies performed by orthopedic specialists have a high diagnostic power (96% for bone-derived lesions; 92% for soft tissue-derived lesions). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous core needle biopsy is highly effective and reliable in diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors. Managing patients by a team using a multidisciplinary approach will increase diagnostic success. KEY WORDS: core needle biopsy, percutaneous, diagnostic accuracy, radiology guided biopsy, bone and soft tissue tumors.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Ondokuz Mayıs University Samsun Turkey
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Samsun University Samsun Turkey
Department of Pathology Ondokuz Mayıs University Samsun Turkey
Department of Radiology Ondokuz Mayıs University Samsun Turkey
Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic Hatay Training and Research Hospital Hatay Turkey
Hodnocení diagnostické přesnosti perkutánní jádrové jehlové biopsie u nádorů kostí a měkkých tkání
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25005465
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250227142523.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250213s2024 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.55095/ACHOT2024/042 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39781639
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Cengiz, T. $u Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy in Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors / $c T. Cengiz, A. Yurtbay, O. Muslu, Ş. Aydin Şimşek, AB. Özbalci, HS. Coşkun, YS. Bariş, N. Dabak
- 246 31
- $a Hodnocení diagnostické přesnosti perkutánní jádrové jehlové biopsie u nádorů kostí a měkkých tkání
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Open (incisional) biopsies have long been accepted as the gold standard in diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors. However, the main disadvantage of this method is that it can lead to increased contamination, hematoma, infection, and pathological fracture. Compared to open biopsies, percutaneous core needle biopsies are less invasive, do not require hospitalization, have low costs and low complication rates, and there is no need for wound healing in cases that require radiotherapy. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of percutaneous core needle biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included the results of 250 percutaneous core needle biopsies of 244 patients who presented at the tertiary university hospital between September 2012 - September 2022 and were diagnosed with a bone or soft tissue tumor using the percutaneous core needle biopsy method and then underwent surgical excision in the Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy rates were calculated for the percutaneous core needle biopsy method according to the compatibility of the results. RESULTS: A fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous Jamshidi needle biopsy performed by an orthopedist for lesions originating from the bone has a diagnostic accuracy of 96%. CT-guided percutaneous Jamshidi needle biopsy performed by a radiologist for lesions originating from the bone has a diagnostic accuracy of 88.9%. Percutaneous Tru-cut needle biopsy performed by an orthopedist without imaging guidance for lesions originating from soft tissue has a diagnostic accuracy of 92%. USGguided percutaneous Tru-cut needle biopsy performed by a radiologist for lesions originating from soft tissue has a diagnostic accuracy of 96,7% (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: The diagnostic accuracy of open biopsies ranges from 91% to 99% in the literature. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies in recent studies ranges from 76% to 99%. Compared to the literature, our study has shown that biopsies performed by orthopedic specialists have a high diagnostic power (96% for bone-derived lesions; 92% for soft tissue-derived lesions). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous core needle biopsy is highly effective and reliable in diagnosing bone and soft tissue tumors. Managing patients by a team using a multidisciplinary approach will increase diagnostic success. KEY WORDS: core needle biopsy, percutaneous, diagnostic accuracy, radiology guided biopsy, bone and soft tissue tumors.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a nádory měkkých tkání $x patologie $x diagnóza $7 D012983
- 650 12
- $a nádory kostí $x patologie $x diagnóza $x chirurgie $7 D001859
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie dutou jehlou $x metody $7 D062005
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a ultrazvukem navigovaná biopsie $x metody $7 D061705
- 650 _2
- $a fluoroskopie $x metody $7 D005471
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Yurtbay, A. $u Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Samsun University, Samsun, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Muslu, O. $u Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic, Hatay Training and Research Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Aydin Şimşek, Ş. $u Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Özbalci, A. B. $u Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Coşkun, H. S. $u Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Bariş, Y S $u Department of Pathology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Dabak, N $u Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 91, č. 6 (2024), s. 376-384
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39781639 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250213 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250227142517 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2275707 $s 1242485
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 91 $c 6 $d 376-384 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $n Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20250213